Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BZ vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK vs RELY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Internet Content & Information
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
BZ vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK vs RELY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Internet Content & Information | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $12.19B | $1.15B | $412M | $581M | $5.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.01B | $595M | $429M | $1.21B | $1.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.49B | $109M | $29M | $105M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 84.5% | 103.0% | 81.3% | 35.5% | 59.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.9% | 20.7% | 2.9% | 11.6% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | 6.1x | 5.6x | 4.9x | 39.7x |
| Total Debt | $302M | $381M | $5M | $298M | $220M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.55B | $298M | $129M | $212M | $542M |
BZ vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK vs RELY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kanzhun Limited (BZ) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.7% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 65.5 | -34.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZ vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK vs RELY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.21
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 39.7x)
- 31.1% margin vs RELY's 6.1%
- 11.7% ROA vs FVRR's 3.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs -0.2%
UPWK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FVRR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.91 vs TASK's 1.23, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, TASK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RELY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- -50.4% 10Y total return vs BZ's -61.4%
- 29.4% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
- -0.5% vs FVRR's -61.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 39.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.1% margin vs RELY's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs TASK's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.5% vs FVRR's -61.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs FVRR's 3.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs -0.2% |
BZ vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK vs RELY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BZ vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK vs RELY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
TASK leads 1 • RELY leads 1 • UPWK leads 0 • FVRR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.0B annually — 18.7x FVRR's $429M. BZ is the more profitable business, keeping 31.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RELY's 6.1%. On growth, RELY holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.0B | $595M | $429M | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $150M | $26M | $204M | $161M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | $109M | $29M | $105M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.3B | $224M | $103M | $88M | $252M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.5% | +103.0% | +81.3% | +35.5% | +59.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +20.7% | +2.9% | +11.6% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +18.3% | +6.7% | +8.7% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | +37.7% | +24.1% | +7.3% | +14.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | -100.0% | -1.6% | +10.3% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.5% | -11.1% | +9.7% | +13.0% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TASK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 92% valuation discount to RELY's 77.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TASK's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RELY's 44.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.2B | $1.1B | $412M | $581M | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $1.2B | $288M | $667M | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.17x | 10.63x | 20.45x | 5.86x | 77.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.64x | 6.12x | 5.59x | 4.89x | 39.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 43.38x | 8.12x | 21.31x | 3.30x | 44.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.27x | 1.46x | 0.96x | 0.49x | 3.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.88x | 1.95x | 1.03x | 1.00x | 6.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.86x | 4.74x | 3.96x | 7.89x | 17.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FVRR and TASK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $7 for FVRR. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs RELY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | +17.9% | +7.0% | +21.2% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +8.5% | +3.1% | +10.3% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +14.3% | -0.2% | +16.3% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +16.2% | -0.3% | +16.7% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.60x | 0.01x | 0.50x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | $83M | -$124M | $86M | -$322M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $298M | $129M | $212M | $542M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $302M | $381M | $5M | $298M | $220M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 146.13x | — | 7.12x | 13.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RELY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RELY five years ago would be worth $4,962 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $685 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, RELY leads with a -0.5% total return vs FVRR's -61.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RELY at 9.8% vs FVRR's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.0% | -55.5% | -41.8% | -11.6% | +81.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.5% | -46.4% | -61.2% | -29.8% | -0.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.0% | +9.7% | -59.2% | -17.5% | +32.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.4% | -76.9% | -93.2% | -67.5% | -50.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.4% | -58.4% | -71.3% | -67.5% | -50.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.9% | +3.1% | -25.8% | -6.2% | +9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FVRR and RELY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TASK's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RELY currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 33.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.12x | 0.91x | 1.23x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.26 | $22.84 | $34.13 | $18.39 | $24.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.85 | $7.44 | $9.67 | $5.89 | $12.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.5% | +38.6% | +33.5% | +35.0% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 45.1 | 57.7 | 37.6 | 71.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 3.8M | 890K | 700K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BZ as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", FVRR as "Hold", TASK as "Buy", RELY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.7% upside for BZ (target: $28) vs -2.3% for RELY (target: $24).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $16.13 | $16.83 | $10.50 | $23.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 23 | 17 | 11 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +11.8% | +7.9% | +4.8% | +1.0% |
BZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TASK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BZ vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK vs RELY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kanzhun Limited (BZ) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Remitly Global, Inc. at 77. 6x. On forward P/E, Kanzhun Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY?
Over the past 5 years, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) delivered a total return of -50. 4%, compared to -93. 2% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RELY returned -50. 4% versus FVRR's -71. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus TaskUs, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning TASK is approximately 34% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Remitly Global, Inc. grew EPS 263. 2% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY?
Kanzhun Limited (BZ) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
5% net margin versus 4. 2% for Remitly Global, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -0. 3% for FVRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BZ leads at 83. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kanzhun Limited (BZ) trades at 1.
6x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Remitly Global, Inc. — 38. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BZ: 99. 7% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BZ or UPWK or FVRR or TASK or RELY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -71. 3%, TASK: -67. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BZ and UPWK and FVRR and TASK and RELY?
These companies operate in different sectors (BZ (Industrials) and UPWK (Industrials) and FVRR (Communication Services) and TASK (Technology) and RELY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.