BZAIW
Blaize Holdings, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-14.5%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BZAIW vs SIFY vs AIOT vs HCTI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SIFY
Sify Technologies Limited
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$1.15B
5Y Perf.+390.1%
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$463M
5Y Perf.-42.5%
HCTI
Healthcare Triangle, Inc.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$49K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
BZAIW vs SIFY vs AIOT vs HCTI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BZAIW | SIFY | AIOT | HCTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $1.15B | $463M | $49K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $41.45B | $436M | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-153M | $-1.50B | $-32M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 12.9% | 34.2% | 55.2% | 13.1% |
| Operating Margin | -427.2% | 5.2% | 1.7% | -45.2% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $39.51B | $287M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $5.00B | $49M | $20K |
BZAIW vs SIFY vs AIOT vs HCTI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BZAIW
SIFY
AIOT
HCTI
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blaize Holdings, In… (BZAIW) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 490.1 | +390.1% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| Healthcare Triangle… (HCTI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZAIW vs SIFY vs AIOT vs HCTI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SIFY leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. PowerFleet, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BZAIW
Blaize Holdings, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
BZAIW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
SIFY
Sify Technologies Limited
The Long-Run Compounder
SIFY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 141.0% 10Y total return vs BZAIW's 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 0.96x
- -3.6% margin vs BZAIW's -11.5%
- Beta 1.33 vs HCTI's 3.07
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.
The Income Pick
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.70, yield 22.2%
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- Beta 2.70, yield 22.2%, current ratio 1.12x
- 66.3% revenue growth vs HCTI's -64.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HCTI
Healthcare Triangle, Inc.
The Secondary Option
HCTI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AIOT | 66.3% revenue growth vs HCTI's -64.8% |
| Quality / Margins | SIFY | -3.6% margin vs BZAIW's -11.5% |
| Stability / Safety | SIFY | Beta 1.33 vs HCTI's 3.07 |
| Dividends | AIOT | 22.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | SIFY | +264.2% vs HCTI's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SIFY | -1.8% ROA vs BZAIW's -232.8%, ROIC 3.3% vs -91.5% |
BZAIW vs SIFY vs AIOT vs HCTI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2022
BZAIW vs SIFY vs AIOT vs HCTI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSIFYLAGGINGHCTI
Who Leads Where
SIFY leads in 3 of 6 categories
AIOT leads 1 • BZAIW leads 0 • HCTI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓HCTIHealthcare Triangle, …
0leads
BZAIWBlaize Holdings, Inc.
0leads
AIOTPowerFleet, Inc.
1leads
SIFYSify Technologies Lim…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AIOTvs BZAIWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SIFY2/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SIFY5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SIFY2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AIOT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BZAIW and SIFY and AIOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.4B annually — 3202.7x HCTI's $13M. SIFY is the more profitable business, keeping -3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BZAIW's -11.5%. On growth, BZAIW holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BZAIWBlaize Holdings, … | SIFYSify Technologies… | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. | HCTIHealthcare Triang… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $41.4B | $436M | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $8.1B | $69M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$153M | -$1.5B | -$32M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$58M | $0 | $3M | -$12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +34.2% | +55.2% | +13.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +5.2% | +1.7% | -45.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -3.6% | -7.4% | -48.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -9.2% | +0.6% | -94.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +2.5% | +47.4% | +44.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -3.7% | -25.5% | -63.8% |
Evenly matched — BZAIW and SIFY and AIOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SIFY leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SIFY's 18.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIOT's 44.2x.
| Metric | BZAIWBlaize Holdings, … | SIFYSify Technologies… | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. | HCTIHealthcare Triang… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1.1B | $463M | $49,177 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $1.5B | $701M | $3M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.77x | -119.57x | -7.91x | -0.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.19x | 44.16x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.26x | 2.73x | 1.28x | 0.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 4.65x | 0.91x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
SIFY leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BZAIW and SIFY each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIOT delivers a -6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BZAIW. BZAIW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BZAIW scores 4/9 vs HCTI's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | BZAIWBlaize Holdings, … | SIFYSify Technologies… | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. | HCTIHealthcare Triang… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | -7.7% | -6.6% | -112.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -1.8% | -3.4% | -60.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -91.5% | +3.3% | -4.3% | -6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -126.2% | +4.4% | -5.1% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.96x | 0.64x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $34.5B | $238M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,506 | $5.0B | $49M | $20,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $39.5B | $287M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.82x | 0.47x | -3.79x |
Evenly matched — BZAIW and SIFY each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIFY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BZAIW five years ago would be worth $10,508 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for HCTI. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +264.2% total return vs HCTI's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIFY at 28.8% vs HCTI's -96.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BZAIWBlaize Holdings, … | SIFYSify Technologies… | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. | HCTIHealthcare Triang… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.1% | +29.2% | -35.2% | -93.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.4% | +264.2% | -32.7% | -99.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | +113.4% | -28.7% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | -12.1% | -28.7% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | +141.0% | -28.7% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | +28.8% | -10.7% | -96.0% |
SIFY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIFY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIFY is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCTI's 3.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIFY currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs HCTI's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BZAIWBlaize Holdings, … | SIFYSify Technologies… | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. | HCTIHealthcare Triang… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.38x | 1.33x | 2.70x | 3.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.57 | $17.85 | $6.07 | $7410.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.18 | $4.15 | $2.77 | $0.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +89.0% | +56.0% | +0.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 56.7 | 52.2 | 36.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45K | 56K | 1.6M | 572K |
SIFY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AIOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIFY as "Buy", AIOT as "Buy". AIOT is the only dividend payer here at 22.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BZAIWBlaize Holdings, … | SIFYSify Technologies… | AIOTPowerFleet, Inc. | HCTIHealthcare Triang… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $8.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 5 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +22.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.36 | $0.75 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
AIOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SIFY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). AIOT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallSify Technologies Limited (SIFY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BZAIW vs SIFY vs AIOT vs HCTI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZAIW or SIFY or AIOT or HCTI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the stronger pick with 11.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -64. 8% for Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI). Analysts rate Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BZAIW or SIFY or AIOT or HCTI?
Over the past 5 years, Blaize Holdings, Inc.
(BZAIW) delivered a total return of +5. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIFY returned +141. 0% versus HCTI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BZAIW or SIFY or AIOT or HCTI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Healthcare Triangle, Inc. 's 3. 07β — meaning HCTI is approximately 132% more volatile than SIFY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BZAIW or SIFY or AIOT or HCTI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is pulling ahead at 11.
9% versus -64. 8% for Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PowerFleet, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -877. 8% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BZAIW or SIFY or AIOT or HCTI?
Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the more profitable company, earning -2.
0% net margin versus -39. 4% for Blaize Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIFY leads at 5. 7% versus -30. 7% for BZAIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BZAIW leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BZAIW or SIFY or AIOT or HCTI?
In this comparison, AIOT (22.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BZAIW, SIFY, HCTI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BZAIW or SIFY or AIOT or HCTI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+141.
0% 10Y return). Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI) carries a higher beta of 3. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIFY: +141. 0%, HCTI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BZAIW and SIFY and AIOT and HCTI?
These companies operate in different sectors (BZAIW (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services) and AIOT (Technology) and HCTI (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BZAIW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HCTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT pays a dividend while BZAIW, SIFY, HCTI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BZAIW: 1419.5% · SIFY: 2.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.