Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BZFD vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Advertising Agencies
BZFD vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $30M | $3.81B | $11.18B | $2.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $185M | $1.44B | $2.97B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $-23M | $433M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 63.8% | 77.8% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | -25.8% | -0.0% | 20.3% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.7x | 21.2x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $197M | $436M | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $320M | $658M | $553M |
BZFD vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Zeta Global Holding… (ZETA) | 100 | 205.7 | +105.7% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZFD vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BZFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ZETA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth 63.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.2%
- 94.4% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- 29.7% revenue growth vs BZFD's -2.4%
- +30.9% vs TTD's -58.4%
TTD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.06
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 17.6%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.06 vs ZETA's 2.79, lower leverage
MGNI is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 21.2x)
- 22.0% margin vs BZFD's -31.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.7% revenue growth vs BZFD's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs BZFD's -31.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs ZETA's 2.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.9% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs BZFD's -28.4%, ROIC 21.3% vs -27.8% |
BZFD vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BZFD vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories
MGNI leads 1 • ZETA leads 1 • BZFD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 16.0x BZFD's $185M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BZFD's -31.2%. On growth, BZFD holds the edge at +66.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $185M | $1.4B | $3.0B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $77M | $693M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | -$23M | $433M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $200M | $837M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.5% | +63.8% | +77.8% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.8% | -0.0% | +20.3% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.2% | -1.6% | +14.6% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +13.9% | +28.2% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.9% | +49.9% | +11.8% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | +100.0% | -20.0% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MGNI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 43% valuation discount to TTD's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZETA's 47.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $3.8B | $11.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $108M | $3.7B | $11.0B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | -123.43x | 25.81x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.71x | 21.21x | 13.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.96x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.63x | 15.54x | 11.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 2.92x | 3.86x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 4.78x | 4.56x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.58x | 14.05x | 12.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-75 for BZFD. TTD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BZFD's 1.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TTD scores 6/9 vs BZFD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.2% | -3.0% | +16.9% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.4% | -1.8% | +7.3% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.8% | +0.7% | +21.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.0% | +0.5% | +19.2% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.71x | 0.24x | 0.18x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $77M | -$123M | -$222M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $320M | $658M | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $197M | $436M | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.78x | 5.22x | 1591.47x | 4.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZETA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZETA five years ago would be worth $19,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $208 for BZFD. Over the past 12 months, ZETA leads with a +30.9% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZETA at 27.8% vs BZFD's -29.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.4% | -13.2% | -37.7% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.6% | +30.9% | -58.4% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.5% | +108.9% | -63.7% | +58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +94.4% | -64.5% | -60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +94.4% | +680.4% | -4.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.2% | +27.8% | -28.7% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZETA and TTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZETA's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZETA currently trades 69.4% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.48x | 2.79x | 1.06x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.68 | $24.90 | $91.45 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $12.10 | $19.74 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.4% | +69.4% | +25.7% | +52.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.6 | 48.5 | 52.8 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 232K | 7.3M | 20.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZETA as "Buy", TTD as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.0% upside for TTD (target: $37) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.33 | $37.12 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 46 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +12.3% | +2.3% |
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGNI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BZFD vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Magnite, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -97. 9% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus BZFD's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Zeta Global Holdings Corp. 's 2. 79β — meaning ZETA is approximately 163% more volatile than TTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 171% for BuzzFeed, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus -2. 4% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -68. 1% for BuzzFeed, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZETA leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -31. 2% for BuzzFeed, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -25. 8% for BZFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for The Trade Desk, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.
08Which pays a better dividend — BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BZFD or ZETA or TTD or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +680. 4% 10Y return). BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +680. 4%, BZFD: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BZFD and ZETA and TTD and MGNI?
These companies operate in different sectors (BZFD (Communication Services) and ZETA (Technology) and TTD (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BZFD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZETA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 33%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.