Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CALI vs LIQT vs POWI vs CANG vs UXIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Semiconductors
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
CALI vs LIQT vs POWI vs CANG vs UXIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Semiconductors | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $203M | $22M | $4.00B | $250M | $21M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $514M | $17M | $446M | $3.46B | $2.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-9M | $17M | $-178M | $-280M |
| Gross Margin | 0.4% | 4.9% | 53.9% | 13.6% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | -50.0% | 4.6% | 7.3% | -8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 50.9x | — | 55.5x | 5.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $60M | $12M | $0.00 | $170M | $1.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | — | $59M | $1.29B | $25M |
CALI vs LIQT vs POWI vs CANG vs UXIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Auto Logistic… (CALI) | 100 | 50415000.0 | +50414900.0% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 89.0 | -11.0% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| Uxin Limited (UXIN) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CALI vs LIQT vs POWI vs CANG vs UXIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CALI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 49.7% 10Y total return vs POWI's 232.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.01 vs CANG's 2.25
LIQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +64.8% vs CANG's -73.7%
POWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- 3.7% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
- 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 2.1% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 2.4% vs -31.1%
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
UXIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.0%, EPS growth 89.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 45.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.8% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.1% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 2.4% vs -31.1% |
CALI vs LIQT vs POWI vs CANG vs UXIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CALI vs LIQT vs POWI vs CANG vs UXIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CALI leads in 2 of 6 categories
CANG leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • LIQT leads 0 • UXIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — POWI and CANG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 206.1x LIQT's $17M. POWI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $514M | $17M | $446M | $3.5B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$969,068 | -$6M | $41M | $333M | -$178M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$9M | $17M | -$178M | -$280M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $466,701 | -$7M | $85M | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +4.9% | +53.9% | +13.6% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -50.0% | +4.6% | +7.3% | -8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -53.3% | +3.7% | -5.2% | -12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -39.3% | +18.9% | -154.0% | -13.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | +53.6% | +2.6% | +58.3% | +64.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +69.4% | -60.0% | +3.6% | +94.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CANG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 97% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALI's 829.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $203M | $22M | $4.0B | $250M | $21M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $260M | $34M | $3.9B | $85M | $274M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.92x | -2.59x | 184.18x | 5.66x | -0.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 55.51x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 829.19x | — | 79.69x | 3.13x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 1.35x | 9.02x | 2.12x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.63x | 2.14x | 6.01x | 0.42x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 45.93x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — POWI and CANG each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI delivers a 2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CALI's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CALI scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.4% | -70.0% | +2.4% | -4.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -29.5% | +2.1% | -2.3% | -14.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.1% | -31.1% | +2.4% | +4.6% | -11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | — | +2.9% | +4.5% | -19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.55x | 1.17x | — | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $57M | $12M | -$59M | -$1.1B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | — | $59M | $1.3B | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $12M | $0 | $170M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | -13.46x | — | -1.87x | -1.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CALI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CALI five years ago would be worth $5,429,458,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $100 for UXIN. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CALI at 2.8% vs UXIN's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +54.9% | +93.2% | -62.0% | -21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.9% | +64.8% | +44.4% | -73.7% | -36.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.5% | -31.3% | -6.3% | +1.2% | -76.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54294486.5% | -96.1% | -8.3% | -14.2% | -99.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4974.3% | -90.9% | +232.7% | -44.9% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | -11.8% | -2.2% | +0.4% | -38.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CALI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALI is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CALI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 0.52x | 2.08x | 2.25x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.79 | $3.35 | $78.94 | $2.88 | $5.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.04 | $1.30 | $30.86 | $0.33 | $2.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +68.9% | +91.0% | +18.6% | +53.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 57.0 | 76.1 | 58.6 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 50K | 967K | 1.3M | 159K |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", UXIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 10.0% for POWI (target: $79). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $79.00 | $3.00 | $4.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 18 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.84 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | +5.3% | 0.0% |
CALI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). CANG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CALI vs LIQT vs POWI vs CANG vs UXIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uxin Limited (UXIN) is the stronger pick with 45.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN?
Over the past 5 years, China Auto Logistics Inc.
(CALI) delivered a total return of +542945%, compared to -99. 0% for Uxin Limited (UXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALI returned +49. 7% versus UXIN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Auto Logistics Inc.
(CALI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 35081% more volatile than CALI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for China Auto Logistics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uxin Limited (UXIN) is pulling ahead at 45.
0% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UXIN leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.
2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CALI, LIQT, CANG, UXIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CALI or LIQT or POWI or CANG or UXIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Auto Logistics Inc.
(CALI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALI: +49. 7%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CALI and LIQT and POWI and CANG and UXIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CALI (Consumer Cyclical) and LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and UXIN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CALI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; UXIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. POWI pays a dividend while CALI, LIQT, CANG, UXIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.