Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CAMP vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CAMP vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $209M | $6.11B | $2.57B | $4.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $827M | $669M | $634M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $-187M | $-609M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 49.7% | 83.6% | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | -14.2% | -8.3% | -83.9% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.5x | — | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $492M | $1.28B | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $985M | $434M | $214M |
CAMP vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAMP4 Therapeutics … (CAMP) | 100 | 42.0 | -58.0% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 184.6 | +84.6% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 51.2 | -48.8% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 126.6 | +26.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAMP vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAMP plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs FOLD's 20.0%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 40.6x)
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.61
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 2.84x
- -4.3% margin vs CAMP's -14.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs FOLD's 20.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 40.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.3% margin vs CAMP's -14.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs CAMP's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.3% vs RARE's -27.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.2% ROA vs CAMP's -104.1% |
CAMP vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CAMP vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FOLD leads in 3 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 2 • CAMP leads 0 • RARE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTCT is the larger business by revenue, generating $827M annually — 217.5x CAMP's $4M. FOLD is the more profitable business, keeping -4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAMP's -14.0%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $827M | $669M | $634M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$52M | -$37M | -$536M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | -$187M | -$609M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$169M | -$487M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +49.7% | +83.6% | +87.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.2% | -8.3% | -83.9% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | -22.6% | -91.0% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.5% | -20.4% | -72.8% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -76.8% | -2.4% | +23.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | -100.3% | -17.2% | -89.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $209M | $6.1B | $2.6B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $154M | $5.6B | $3.4B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.68x | 9.47x | -4.48x | -164.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.27x | — | 114.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 320.68x | 3.53x | 3.82x | 7.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | — | — | 16.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.70x | — | 152.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD delivers a -12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. CAMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs FOLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -133.5% | — | -6.1% | -12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -104.1% | -6.8% | -45.8% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -89.4% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -91.7% | +55.9% | -46.4% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | — | — | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$55M | -$492M | $842M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $985M | $434M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $492M | $1.3B | $483M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.67x | -14.49x | 1.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $18,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,391 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +138.3% total return vs RARE's -27.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTCT at 9.9% vs CAMP's -25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.7% | -4.0% | +10.7% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.4% | +73.3% | -27.4% | +138.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.4% | +32.7% | -44.5% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.4% | +89.4% | -76.1% | +54.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.4% | +852.1% | -59.4% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.3% | +9.9% | -17.8% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAMP's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs CAMP's 57.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.03x | 1.36x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.70 | $87.50 | $42.37 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $39.53 | $18.29 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.9% | +84.2% | +61.6% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 40.0 | 67.7 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 211K | 1.1M | 1.8M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAMP as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 155.6% upside for CAMP (target: $11) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.40 | $98.00 | $48.36 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 26 | 33 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FOLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTCT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
CAMP vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CAMP4 Therapeutics Corporation (CAMP) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -76. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus CAMP4 Therapeutics Corporation's 1. 78β — meaning CAMP is approximately 190% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CAMP4 Therapeutics Corporation (CAMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -79. 4% for CAMP4 Therapeutics Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -81. 4% for CAMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAMP leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAMP: 155.
6% to $11. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CAMP or PTCT or RARE or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). CAMP4 Therapeutics Corporation (CAMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, CAMP: -58. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CAMP and PTCT and RARE and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.