Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CARG vs KMX vs AN vs PAG vs LAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
CARG vs KMX vs AN vs PAG vs LAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $3.77B | $5.71B | $7.05B | $11.29B | $6.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $957M | $27.38B | $27.49B | $32.07B | $37.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $149M | $458M | $679M | $926M | $711M |
| Gross Margin | 89.9% | 11.0% | 17.7% | 16.4% | 15.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 1.7% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 14.8x | 9.7x | 13.0x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $191M | $19.43B | $10.18B | $8.82B | $14.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $191M | $247M | $59M | $65M | $342M |
CARG vs KMX vs AN vs PAG vs LAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
| CarMax, Inc. (KMX) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
| AutoNation, Inc. (AN) | 100 | 520.0 | +420.0% |
| Penske Automotive G… (PAG) | 100 | 480.1 | +380.1% |
| Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) | 100 | 241.5 | +141.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CARG vs KMX vs AN vs PAG vs LAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CARG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 6.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 51.0%, current ratio 2.81x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs PAG's -0.2%
- 15.6% margin vs KMX's 1.7%
KMX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs CARG's 0.85
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 13.0x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.81
PAG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 3.0%
- 427.6% 10Y total return vs AN's 324.6%
- Beta 0.66, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.99x
- Beta 0.66 vs KMX's 1.32, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, LAD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs PAG's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 13.0x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs KMX's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs KMX's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LAD's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.6% vs KMX's -39.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.2% ROA vs KMX's 1.8%, ROIC 36.2% vs 2.4% |
CARG vs KMX vs AN vs PAG vs LAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CARG vs KMX vs AN vs PAG vs LAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories
LAD leads 1 • KMX leads 0 • AN leads 0 • PAG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 39.4x CARG's $957M. CARG is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMX's 1.7%. On growth, CARG holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $957M | $27.4B | $27.5B | $32.1B | $37.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $791M | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $149M | $458M | $679M | $926M | $711M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $281M | $1.9B | -$104M | $465M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.9% | +11.0% | +17.7% | +16.4% | +15.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +1.7% | +4.4% | +3.9% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +1.7% | +2.5% | +2.9% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +7.1% | -0.4% | +1.4% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | -13.4% | -2.1% | +3.4% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | -46.9% | +33.0% | -2.7% | -46.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LAD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, LAD trades at a 63% valuation discount to CARG's 24.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AN offers better value at 0.38x vs CARG's 1.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $5.7B | $7.0B | $11.3B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $24.9B | $17.2B | $20.0B | $21.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.62x | 12.43x | 12.05x | 12.15x | 9.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.14x | 14.81x | 9.70x | 12.97x | 8.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.37x | — | 0.38x | 0.76x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.64x | 22.61x | 10.83x | 13.80x | 11.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.02x | 0.20x | 0.26x | 0.35x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.87x | 1.00x | 3.34x | 2.04x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.06x | 36.48x | — | 15.25x | 34.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $8 for KMX. CARG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AN's 4.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMX scores 8/9 vs LAD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.9% | +7.5% | +28.4% | +16.4% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.2% | +1.8% | +4.8% | +5.2% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +36.2% | +2.4% | +8.5% | +6.9% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.1% | +3.1% | +17.2% | +11.5% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 3.11x | 4.35x | 1.58x | 2.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $315,000 | $19.2B | $10.1B | $8.8B | $14.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $191M | $247M | $59M | $65M | $342M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $19.4B | $10.2B | $8.8B | $14.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.08x | 4.53x | 6.37x | 2.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CARG and PAG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAG five years ago would be worth $20,467 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,070 for KMX. Over the past 12 months, CARG leads with a +34.6% total return vs KMX's -39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARG at 32.9% vs KMX's -18.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +1.6% | -0.6% | +9.4% | -12.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.6% | -39.4% | +16.9% | +14.2% | -0.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.8% | -45.1% | +52.4% | +32.1% | +35.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | -69.3% | +94.1% | +104.7% | -21.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.4% | -22.1% | +324.6% | +427.6% | +264.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.9% | -18.1% | +15.1% | +9.7% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CARG and PAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAG is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMX's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs KMX's 55.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 1.32x | 0.85x | 0.66x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.42 | $71.99 | $228.92 | $189.51 | $360.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.39 | $30.26 | $174.34 | $140.12 | $239.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +55.4% | +89.7% | +90.6% | +80.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 47.5 | 53.7 | 65.5 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 3.2M | 412K | 275K | 313K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PAG and LAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CARG as "Buy", KMX as "Hold", AN as "Buy", PAG as "Buy", LAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.4% upside for LAD (target: $412) vs -5.3% for KMX (target: $38). For income investors, PAG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.02% vs LAD's 0.75%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.42 | $37.78 | $248.00 | $190.00 | $411.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 35 | 34 | 26 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $5.19 | $2.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.3% | +7.5% | +11.2% | +1.4% | +14.5% |
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LAD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CARG vs KMX vs AN vs PAG vs LAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the stronger pick with 5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG). Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD?
On trailing P/E, Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus CarGurus, Inc. at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Lithia Motors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AutoNation, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus CarGurus, Inc. 's 0. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD?
Over the past 5 years, Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) delivered a total return of +104. 7%, compared to -69. 3% for CarMax, Inc. (KMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAG returned +427. 6% versus KMX's -22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus CarMax, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning KMX is approximately 99% more volatile than PAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 4% for AutoNation, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is pulling ahead at 5. 0% versus -0. 2% for Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarGurus, Inc. grew EPS 675. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 5% for Penske Automotive Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAD leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD?
CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus 1. 8% for CarMax, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARG leads at 20. 7% versus 2. 8% for KMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CARG leads at 89. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AutoNation, Inc. (AN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus CarGurus, Inc. 's 0. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for CarGurus, Inc. — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAD: 41. 4% to $411. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD?
In this comparison, PAG (3.
0% yield), LAD (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CARG, KMX, AN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CARG or KMX or AN or PAG or LAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 3. 0% yield, +427. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAG: +427. 6%, KMX: -22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CARG and KMX and AN and PAG and LAD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CARG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KMX is a small-cap deep-value stock; AN is a small-cap deep-value stock; PAG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. PAG, LAD pay a dividend while CARG, KMX, AN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.