Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CAT vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs PCAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
CAT vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs PCAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $420.89B | $156.08B | $12.80B | $8.29B | $59.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70.75B | $45.88B | $18.09B | $10.37B | $27.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9.42B | $4.08B | $386M | $771M | $2.48B |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 34.7% | 31.4% | 24.9% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 17.0% | 14.6% | 6.9% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | 39.2x | 32.3x | 24.9x | 19.8x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $43.33B | $63.94B | $27.03B | $2.69B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.98B | $8.28B | $3.23B | $862M | $9.25B |
CAT vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs PCAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 753.0 | +653.0% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 378.5 | +278.5% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 167.8 | +67.8% |
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 207.4 | +107.4% |
| PACCAR Inc (PCAR) | 100 | 230.3 | +130.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAT vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs PCAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 12.0% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.6%
- PEG 1.39 vs DE's 1.98
- 4.3% revenue growth vs PCAR's -15.5%
DE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54
CNH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AGCO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PCAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.8% yield, vs DE's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs PCAR's -15.5% | |
| Value | PEG 1.39 vs 1.72 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs CNH's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs DE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.8% vs CNH's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 15.9% vs 6.6% |
CAT vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs PCAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAT vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs PCAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
DE leads 0 • CNH leads 0 • AGCO leads 0 • PCAR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 6.8x AGCO's $10.4B. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNH's 2.1%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70.8B | $45.9B | $18.1B | $10.4B | $27.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.0B | $9.5B | $3.3B | $963M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.4B | $4.1B | $386M | $771M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11.4B | $5.5B | $1.8B | $546M | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +34.7% | +31.4% | +24.9% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +17.0% | +14.6% | +6.9% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +8.9% | +2.1% | +7.4% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +12.0% | +10.2% | +5.3% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.2% | +16.3% | -0.1% | +14.3% | -16.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | -24.1% | -94.4% | +4.4% | +19.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNH and AGCO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, AGCO trades at a 76% valuation discount to CAT's 48.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AGCO offers better value at 1.02x vs PCAR's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $420.9B | $156.1B | $12.8B | $8.3B | $59.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $454.2B | $211.7B | $36.6B | $10.1B | $50.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.04x | 31.12x | 25.17x | 11.75x | 25.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.18x | 32.27x | 24.87x | 19.82x | 19.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.71x | 1.91x | — | 1.02x | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.72x | 19.89x | 10.71x | 9.86x | 13.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.23x | 3.49x | 0.71x | 0.82x | 2.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.90x | 6.02x | 1.65x | 1.87x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.97x | 48.31x | 6.42x | 11.20x | 19.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNH. AGCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGCO scores 8/9 vs PCAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.5% | +15.5% | +4.9% | +16.7% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | +3.9% | +0.9% | +6.3% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.9% | +7.7% | +6.6% | +8.3% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +11.4% | +8.3% | +9.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.03x | 2.46x | 3.45x | 0.59x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.4B | $55.7B | $23.8B | $1.8B | -$9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.0B | $8.3B | $3.2B | $862M | $9.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43.3B | $63.9B | $27.0B | $2.7B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.22x | 2.74x | 1.76x | 10.36x | 129.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $39,125 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,500 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.8% total return vs CNH's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.4% vs CNH's -8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.7% | +23.7% | +10.4% | +8.5% | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +181.8% | +21.0% | -14.9% | +20.7% | +29.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +328.4% | +55.9% | -22.3% | -1.2% | +70.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.3% | +59.1% | -25.0% | -10.7% | +111.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1203.2% | +659.4% | +72.4% | +173.0% | +269.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.4% | +15.9% | -8.0% | -0.4% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CNH's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.56x | 1.15x | 1.10x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $908.90 | $674.19 | $14.27 | $143.78 | $131.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $318.11 | $433.00 | $9.00 | $93.30 | $88.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +85.4% | +72.3% | +79.7% | +86.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.7 | 49.1 | 42.6 | 54.6 | 35.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 1.2M | 15.2M | 689K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAT and DE and PCAR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", CNH as "Buy", AGCO as "Buy", PCAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for CNH (target: $13) vs -8.8% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, PCAR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $824.80 | $680.54 | $13.25 | $127.29 | $124.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 53 | 46 | 14 | 29 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.1% | +2.6% | +1.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.86 | $6.33 | $0.27 | $1.16 | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.1% |
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
CAT vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs PCAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for PACCAR Inc (PCAR). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR?
On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 48. 0x. On forward P/E, PACCAR Inc is actually cheaper at 19. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 39x versus Deere & Company's 1. 98x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +291. 3%, compared to -25. 0% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1203% versus CNH's +72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 173% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -15. 5% for PACCAR Inc (PCAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 2. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 6. 9% for AGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 39x versus Deere & Company's 1. 98x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, PACCAR Inc (PCAR) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 39. 2x for Caterpillar Inc. — 19. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNH: 28. 4% to $13. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PACCAR Inc (PCAR) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 6% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is CAT or DE or CNH or AGCO or PCAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +659. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +659. 4%, CNH: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAT and DE and CNH and AGCO and PCAR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCAR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.