Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CCB vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs NWBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CCB vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs NWBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $936M | $7.15B | $2.72B | $2.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $661M | $336M | $3.21B | $1.41B | $877M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $68M | $550M | $243M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 72.4% | 67.7% | 50.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 23.2% | 23.4% | 20.5% | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 13.4x | 9.8x | 10.9x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $42M | $4.01B | $1.82B | $446M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $53M | $511M | $657M | $234M |
CCB vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs NWBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal Financial C… (CCB) | 100 | 573.7 | +473.7% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.8 | +44.8% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 123.3 | +23.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.5 | +37.5% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 139.5 | +39.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCB vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs NWBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 344.3% 10Y total return vs HFWA's 110.3%
- PEG 0.83 vs WAFD's 3.54
- NIM 6.5% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- PEG 0.83 vs 1.24
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 1.18x
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +31.0% vs CCB's -13.2%
WAFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5%
NWBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 5.4%
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- Beta 0.73, yield 5.4%, current ratio 0.13x
- 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | PEG 0.83 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs CCB's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, vs WAFD's 3.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.0% vs CCB's -13.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% |
CCB vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs NWBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCB vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs NWBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HFWA leads in 2 of 6 categories
CCB leads 2 • COLB leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • NWBI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 9.6x HFWA's $336M. HFWA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCB's 7.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $661M | $336M | $3.2B | $1.4B | $877M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $80M | $895M | $277M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $68M | $550M | $243M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $246M | $86M | $724M | $226M | $142M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +72.4% | +67.7% | +50.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +23.2% | +23.4% | +20.5% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +20.1% | +17.1% | +16.0% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +25.5% | +22.0% | +14.8% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | +85.7% | +5.9% | +46.3% | +19.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CCB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, COLB trades at a 46% valuation discount to CCB's 24.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCB offers better value at 1.22x vs WAFD's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $936M | $7.2B | $2.7B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $925M | $10.6B | $3.9B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.97x | 14.04x | 13.06x | 13.52x | 15.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.32x | 13.38x | 9.82x | 10.89x | 10.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.22x | 1.61x | — | 4.39x | 1.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.51x | 11.62x | 11.89x | 12.95x | 13.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 2.78x | 2.22x | 1.93x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.29x | 1.03x | 1.14x | 0.94x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.51x | 10.92x | 10.13x | 13.05x | 14.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HFWA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCB delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for NWBI. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +7.5% | +8.4% | +8.0% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +5.2% | +5.4% | +3.9% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +4.1% | +2.0% | +5.7% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.05x | 0.51x | 0.60x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | -$10M | $3.5B | $1.2B | $213M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $53M | $511M | $657M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $42M | $4.0B | $1.8B | $446M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.87x | 0.82x | 0.48x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCB five years ago would be worth $22,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,419 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +31.0% total return vs CCB's -13.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCB at 28.5% vs WAFD's 14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.7% | +18.1% | +7.9% | +11.5% | +19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.2% | +20.9% | +31.0% | +26.1% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.2% | +93.0% | +77.8% | +51.1% | +56.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.9% | +12.8% | -15.8% | +23.0% | +28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +344.3% | +110.3% | +52.8% | +83.9% | +52.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.5% | +24.5% | +21.1% | +14.8% | +16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCB's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs CCB's 60.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 0.96x | 1.36x | 0.79x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.05 | $28.90 | $32.70 | $36.12 | $14.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.72 | $21.32 | $21.91 | $26.31 | $11.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.7% | +95.2% | +91.9% | +98.4% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.7 | 54.1 | 54.0 | 68.6 | 57.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 152K | 287K | 2.7M | 657K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAFD and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCB as "Buy", HFWA as "Buy", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 81.9% upside for CCB (target: $133) vs -1.5% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.39% vs WAFD's 2.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $132.50 | $31.33 | $32.90 | $35.00 | $14.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 19 | 11 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.4% | +3.8% | +3.0% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.95 | $1.13 | $1.05 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.6% | +1.5% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
HFWA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
CCB vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs NWBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI?
On trailing P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Coastal Financial Corporation at 24. 0x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coastal Financial Corporation wins at 0. 83x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI?
Over the past 5 years, Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) delivered a total return of +127.
9%, compared to -15. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCB returned +344. 3% versus NWBI's +52. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Coastal Financial Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning CCB is approximately 118% more volatile than NWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Financial Corporation grew EPS 58. 1% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI?
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus 7. 1% for Coastal Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLB leads at 23. 4% versus 9. 3% for CCB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Coastal Financial Corporation — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCB: 81. 9% to $132. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI?
In this comparison, NWBI (5.
4% yield), COLB (3. 8% yield), HFWA (3. 4% yield), WAFD (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CCB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCB or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or NWBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 5. 4% yield). Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWBI: +52. 7%, CCB: +344. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCB and HFWA and COLB and WAFD and NWBI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. HFWA, COLB, WAFD, NWBI pay a dividend while CCB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.