Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CCCC vs VRTX vs CRL vs MEDP vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
CCCC vs VRTX vs CRL vs MEDP vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $247M | $108.10B | $8.98B | $12.24B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $12.26B | $4.03B | $2.68B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-105M | $4.34B | $-185M | $460M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 95.0% | 86.3% | 24.9% | 29.1% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -320.5% | 39.0% | 11.8% | 21.0% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | 16.4x | 25.2x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $3.88B | $3.07B | $250M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $5.09B | $214M | $497M | $1.98B |
CCCC vs VRTX vs CRL vs MEDP vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| C4 Therapeutics, In… (CCCC) | 100 | 12.0 | -88.0% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 386.4 | +286.4% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCCC vs VRTX vs CRL vs MEDP vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCCC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +98.7% vs VRTX's -2.3%
VRTX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 20.8%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.90x
- 35.4% margin vs CCCC's -292.1%
- Beta 0.82 vs CCCC's 2.35, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MEDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs VRTX's 382.6%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- 24.8% ROA vs CCCC's -33.9%, ROIC 154.9% vs -33.5%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- PEG 0.35 vs VRTX's 2.68
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 25.2x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.79
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 25.2x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs CCCC's -292.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs CCCC's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.7% vs VRTX's -2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs CCCC's -33.9%, ROIC 154.9% vs -33.5% |
CCCC vs VRTX vs CRL vs MEDP vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCCC vs VRTX vs CRL vs MEDP vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories
MEDP leads 2 • VRTX leads 1 • CCCC leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CCCC and VRTX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 462.7x CCCC's $36M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCCC's -2.9%. On growth, CCCC holds the edge at +112.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $12.3B | $4.0B | $2.7B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$113M | $4.9B | $757M | $577M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$105M | $4.3B | -$185M | $460M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | $3.7B | $391M | $745M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.0% | +86.3% | +24.9% | +29.1% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +39.0% | +11.8% | +21.0% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +35.4% | -4.6% | +17.2% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +30.3% | +9.7% | +27.8% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +112.8% | +7.8% | +1.2% | +26.5% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.3% | +61.4% | -160.0% | +16.6% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 19% valuation discount to MEDP's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs VRTX's 3.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $108.1B | $9.0B | $12.2B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $232M | $106.9B | $11.8B | $12.0B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.35x | 27.74x | -62.52x | 28.06x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.18x | 16.42x | 25.24x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.35x | — | 0.88x | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.52x | 12.98x | 21.31x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.87x | 8.95x | 2.24x | 4.84x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 5.87x | 2.81x | 27.57x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.85x | 17.31x | 17.96x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-54 for CCCC. VRTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs CCCC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.8% | +23.9% | -5.7% | +120.9% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.9% | +17.1% | -2.5% | +24.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.5% | +23.0% | +6.3% | +154.9% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.1% | +23.1% | +8.1% | +65.7% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.21x | 0.95x | 0.55x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$1.2B | $2.9B | -$247M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $5.1B | $214M | $497M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $3.9B | $3.1B | $250M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 488.09x | 6.38x | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $869 for CCCC. Over the past 12 months, CCCC leads with a +98.7% total return vs VRTX's -2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 27.0% vs CCCC's -2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.4% | -6.0% | -10.1% | -24.9% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +98.7% | -2.3% | +32.8% | +42.9% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.7% | +23.5% | -4.2% | +104.6% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +97.7% | -46.9% | +159.4% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.3% | +382.6% | +119.2% | +1442.7% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.6% | +7.3% | -1.4% | +27.0% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
VRTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCCC's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRTX currently trades 83.7% from its 52-week high vs MEDP's 68.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.35x | 0.82x | 1.52x | 1.26x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.82 | $507.92 | $228.88 | $628.92 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $362.50 | $131.30 | $284.48 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +83.7% | +79.5% | +68.2% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 43.2 | 57.2 | 40.6 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 1.2M | 806K | 371K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCCC as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.9% upside for CCCC (target: $7) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $552.27 | $205.43 | $498.86 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 56 | 36 | 19 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.9% | +4.0% | +7.5% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MEDP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CCCC vs VRTX vs CRL vs MEDP vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -91. 3% for C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus CCCC's -88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
82β versus C4 Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 35β — meaning CCCC is approximately 188% more volatile than VRTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -292. 1% for C4 Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -290. 7% for CCCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRTX leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCCC: 134. 9% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CCCC or VRTX or CRL or MEDP or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1443% 10Y return). C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1443%, CCCC: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCCC and VRTX and CRL and MEDP and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.