REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCI vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
CCI vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $39.74B | $817M | $8.71B | $198.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.21B | $949M | $12.12B | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.06B | $-170M | $-1.74B | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 32.4% | 35.2% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | -7.9% | -2.6% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 43.9x | — | — | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $29.57B | $2.93B | $17.71B | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $269M | $205M | $1.00B | $19.05B |
CCI vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCI vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- 25.1% margin vs CCOI's -17.9%
- Beta 0.26 vs LUMN's 2.74
CCOI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.67, yield 19.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.67, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 1.67, yield 19.2%, current ratio 2.04x
- 19.2% yield, vs VZ's 5.8%
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.0% vs CCOI's -65.4%
VZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.3%
- 41.6% 10Y total return vs CCI's 57.9%
- 2.5% revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.1% margin vs CCOI's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 19.2% yield, vs VZ's 5.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs CCOI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs CCOI's -5.4%, ROIC 8.0% vs -3.1% |
CCI vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCI vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VZ leads in 3 of 6 categories
CCI leads 1 • LUMN leads 1 • CCOI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 145.7x CCOI's $949M. CCI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCOI's -17.9%. On growth, VZ holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $949M | $12.1B | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $174M | $2.4B | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | -$170M | -$1.7B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.7B | -$208M | $5.4B | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.7% | +32.4% | +35.2% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | -7.9% | -2.6% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | -17.9% | -14.3% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +64.7% | -21.9% | +44.9% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | -3.2% | -8.9% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.1% | +23.9% | 0.0% | -53.4% |
Valuation Metrics
VZ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, VZ trades at a 87% valuation discount to CCI's 89.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VZ's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCI's 24.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39.7B | $817M | $8.7B | $198.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69.0B | $3.5B | $25.4B | $380.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.28x | -4.29x | -4.83x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 43.94x | — | — | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.94x | 21.30x | 9.91x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.32x | 0.84x | 0.70x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.82x | — | 23.49x | 9.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VZ leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VZ delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCI scores 4/9 vs CCOI's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -2.3% | -79.4% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | -5.4% | -5.3% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | -3.1% | -0.8% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | -3.6% | -0.6% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.3B | $2.7B | $16.7B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $269M | $205M | $1.0B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.6B | $2.9B | $17.7B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.17x | -0.52x | -1.12x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth $10,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,236 for CCOI. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs CCOI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs CCOI's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -20.8% | +10.0% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.0% | -65.4% | +100.0% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -60.0% | +267.8% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.8% | -57.6% | -28.8% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.9% | +13.1% | -35.7% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.5% | -26.3% | +54.4% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs CCOI's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | 1.67x | 2.74x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $115.76 | $55.24 | $11.95 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.96 | $14.82 | $3.37 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.7% | +29.5% | +70.8% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 34.3 | 73.4 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 1.2M | 12.5M | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCOI and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCI as "Buy", CCOI as "Hold", LUMN as "Hold", VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.5% upside for CCOI (target: $28) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, CCOI offers the higher dividend yield at 19.18% vs CCI's 5.23%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $105.40 | $27.50 | $7.08 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 32 | 28 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.2% | +19.2% | +0.0% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.76 | $3.13 | $0.00 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CCI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CCI vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
On trailing P/E, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Crown Castle Inc. at 89. 3x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) delivered a total return of +2. 8%, compared to -57. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCI returned +57. 9% versus LUMN's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately -2681% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Castle Inc. grew EPS 111. 4% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCOI leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -18. 7% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCI leads at 48. 7% versus -10. 6% for CCOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCI leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for Crown Castle Inc. — 34. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 68. 5% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
In this comparison, CCOI (19.
2% yield), VZ (5. 8% yield), CCI (5. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LUMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCI or CCOI or LUMN or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), 5. 8% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +41. 6%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCI and CCOI and LUMN and VZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCI (Real Estate) and CCOI (Communication Services) and LUMN (Communication Services) and VZ (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CCI, CCOI, VZ pay a dividend while LUMN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.6%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.