Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $11.35B | $6.21B | $4.25B | $5.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.37B | $5.36B | $6.58B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $737M | $506M | $283M | $1.04B |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 29.8% | 17.4% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 13.5% | 9.8% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 12.4x | 10.6x | 8.8x |
| Total Debt | $6.17B | $4.10B | $4.62B | $4.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $879M | $344M | $1.08B | $378M |
CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) | 100 | 154.5 | +54.5% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.8 | -0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 1.03x
SEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.32 vs SLGN's 0.66
- +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7%
SLGN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- PEG 0.62 vs SEE's 9.73
- Beta 0.53, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.62 vs 9.73 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs SLGN's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs SLGN's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 30-year raise streak, vs SLGN's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 6.2% vs 8.7% |
CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SON leads in 3 of 6 categories
SEE leads 2 • CCK leads 1 • SLGN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 2.3x SEE's $5.4B. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, CCK holds the edge at +7.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $5.4B | $6.6B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $965M | $966M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $737M | $506M | $283M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $459M | $307M | $266M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +29.8% | +17.4% | +20.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +13.5% | +9.8% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +9.4% | +4.3% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +8.6% | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +2.1% | +6.5% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.6% | +16.4% | -6.3% | +23.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 22% valuation discount to CCK's 15.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SON offers better value at 0.92x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.3B | $6.2B | $4.3B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.6B | $10.0B | $7.8B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.85x | 12.29x | 14.91x | 12.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.46x | 12.38x | 10.60x | 8.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.05x | 9.66x | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.96x | 14.33x | 7.97x | 7.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 1.16x | 0.66x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.36x | 5.02x | 1.89x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.34x | 13.54x | 10.07x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SON leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. SON carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.8% | +48.4% | +12.5% | +30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +7.1% | +3.0% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.1% | +11.2% | +8.7% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +14.1% | +9.9% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.77x | 3.31x | 2.03x | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.3B | $3.8B | $3.5B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $879M | $344M | $1.1B | $378M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.2B | $4.1B | $4.6B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.00x | 1.95x | 3.36x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,088 for SEE. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCK at 7.3% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | +2.0% | -1.9% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | +44.2% | -23.7% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.5% | +2.4% | -11.1% | -3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.9% | -19.1% | +1.4% | -9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +4.4% | +80.8% | +48.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | +0.8% | -3.8% | -1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLGN's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.32x | 0.66x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.62 | $44.27 | $57.04 | $58.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $89.21 | $28.15 | $36.15 | $38.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +95.2% | +70.6% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 64.0 | 51.1 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 984K | 3.0M | 769K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCK as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", SLGN as "Buy", SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, SON offers the higher dividend yield at 4.04% vs CCK's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.50 | $43.50 | $50.50 | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 27 | 21 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.9% | +2.0% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 | 21 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.04 | $0.81 | $0.80 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.2% |
SON leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SEE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility).
CCK vs SEE vs SLGN vs SON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Crown Holdings, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sonoco Products Company wins at 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON?
Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -19. 1% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 0% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Silgan Holdings Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning SLGN is approximately 104% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sonoco Products Company (SON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.
7% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 9. 5% for SON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Crown Holdings, Inc. — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).
09Is CCK or SEE or SLGN or SON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, SLGN: +80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCK and SEE and SLGN and SON?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.