CCK vs SLGN

For growth investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus Crown Holdings, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -6. 9% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 0% versus SLGN's +80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crown Holdings, Inc.

(CCK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Silgan Holdings Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning SLGN is approximately 38% more volatile than CCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 177% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLGN leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Crown Holdings, Inc.

(CCK) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCK leads at 13. 2% versus 10. 2% for SLGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCK leads at 18. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Crown Holdings, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Crown Holdings, Inc.

(CCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCK: +98. 0%, SLGN: +80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.