Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CDLX vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$43M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$477M
5Y Perf.-92.9%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.-54.4%
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-63.4%

CDLX vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CDLX logoCDLX
APPS logoAPPS
MGNI logoMGNI
PUBM logoPUBM
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - ApplicationAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$43M$477M$2.01B$485M
Revenue (TTM)$206M$532M$723M$282M
Net Income (TTM)$-95M$-42M$159M$-17M
Gross Margin38.9%60.1%63.4%63.2%
Operating Margin-22.8%0.1%14.8%-7.3%
Forward P/E10.1x13.4x
Total Debt$215M$418M$279M$44M
Cash & Equiv.$49M$40M$553M$146M

CDLX vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CDLX
APPS
MGNI
PUBM
StockDec 20May 26Return
Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX)1000.5-99.5%
Digital Turbine, In… (APPS)1007.1-92.9%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)10045.6-54.4%
PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM)10036.6-63.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CDLX vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MGNI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Digital Turbine, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. PUBM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.
The Secondary Option

CDLX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.
The Value Play

APPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Growth Play

MGNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 493.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
  • -4.7% 10Y total return vs APPS's 353.4%
  • 6.9% revenue growth vs CDLX's -16.2%
  • 22.0% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.
The Income Pick

PUBM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.51
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 1.39x
  • Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.39x
  • Beta 1.51 vs CDLX's 3.18
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMGNI logoMGNI6.9% revenue growth vs CDLX's -16.2%
ValueAPPS logoAPPSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsMGNI logoMGNI22.0% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
Stability / SafetyPUBM logoPUBMBeta 1.51 vs CDLX's 3.18
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MGNI logoMGNI+12.6% vs CDLX's -63.8%
Efficiency (ROA)MGNI logoMGNI5.3% ROA vs CDLX's -31.5%, ROIC 9.5% vs -18.3%

CDLX vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CDLXCardlytics, Inc.
FY 2025
Cost per Redemption
50.9%$129M
Cost per Served Sales
31.1%$79M
Bridg Subscription Revenue
8.2%$21M
Bridg Total Revenue
8.2%$21M
Cost Other
1.6%$4M
APPSDigital Turbine, Inc.
FY 2022
On Device Media
100.0%$503M
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PUBMPubMatic, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$283M

CDLX vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMGNILAGGINGAPPS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MGNI is the larger business by revenue, generating $723M annually — 3.5x CDLX's $206M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDLX's -46.0%. On growth, APPS holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$206M$532M$723M$282M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$23M$70M$145M$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$95M-$42M$159M-$17M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6M$19M$44M$43M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.9%+60.1%+63.4%+63.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-22.8%+0.1%+14.8%-7.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-46.0%-7.9%+22.0%-6.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.9%+3.5%+6.1%+15.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.6%+12.4%+5.5%-2.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%+113.6%+142.9%-35.0%
MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CDLX and PUBM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPS's 29.7x.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$43M$477M$2.0B$485M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$210M$855M$1.7B$384M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.40x-4.48x14.74x-33.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.10x13.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.66x11.43x14.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.18x0.97x2.81x1.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.69x2.33x1.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.89x12.11x7.28x
Evenly matched — CDLX and PUBM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MGNI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CDLX. PUBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APPS's 2.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDLX scores 6/9 vs APPS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.7%-21.5%+18.6%-7.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-31.5%-4.9%+5.3%-2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.3%-7.4%+9.5%-6.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.9%-8.9%+7.3%-5.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96465
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.72x0.30x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$167M$378M-$275M-$102M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$49M$40M$553M$146M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$215M$418M$279M$44M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.37x-1.83x4.03x
MGNI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MGNI five years ago would be worth $3,906 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, MGNI leads with a +12.6% total return vs CDLX's -63.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs CDLX's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-30.2%-16.5%-12.8%+19.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-63.8%+10.5%+12.6%+2.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.5%-66.5%+58.7%-18.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%-93.9%-60.9%-77.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.2%+353.4%-4.7%-65.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.8%-30.6%+16.7%-6.6%
MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PUBM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PUBM is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDLX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PUBM currently trades 73.8% from its 52-week high vs CDLX's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.18x1.72x1.63x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.28$8.28$26.65$13.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.66$2.74$10.82$6.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+23.8%+48.2%+52.5%+73.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.662.955.466.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M2.1M2.1M746K
PUBM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: APPS as "Hold", MGNI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 150.6% upside for APPS (target: $10) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$18.00$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts113116
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.3%+9.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MGNI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PUBM leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallMagnite, Inc. (MGNI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CDLX vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM?

On forward P/E, Digital Turbine, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM?

Over the past 5 years, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) delivered a total return of -60. 9%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPS returned +353. 4% versus CDLX's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PubMatic, Inc.

(PUBM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Cardlytics, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning CDLX is approximately 112% more volatile than PUBM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGNI leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM?

Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PUBM leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Digital Turbine, Inc.

(APPS) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Magnite, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APPS: 150. 6% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CDLX or APPS or MGNI or PUBM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Digital Turbine, Inc.

(APPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+353. 4% 10Y return). Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPS: +353. 4%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CDLX and APPS and MGNI and PUBM?

These companies operate in different sectors (CDLX (Communication Services) and APPS (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CDLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CDLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APPS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGNI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUBM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CDLX and APPS and MGNI and PUBM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CDLX: -44.6% · APPS: 12.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.