Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CDRO vs MGM vs DKNG vs WYNN vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
CDRO vs MGM vs DKNG vs WYNN vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $423M | $9.75B | $12.50B | $11.14B | $5.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $201M | $17.72B | $6.05B | $7.29B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $183M | $4M | $425M | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 90.6% | 44.2% | 41.3% | 28.5% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 5.2% | -0.2% | 15.7% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 22.1x | 99.1x | 20.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $56.16B | $1.93B | $12.29B | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $2.06B | $1.60B | $1.46B | $887M |
CDRO vs MGM vs DKNG vs WYNN vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codere Online Luxem… (CDRO) | 100 | 92.0 | -8.0% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 133.4 | +33.4% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 46.6 | -53.4% |
| Wynn Resorts, Limit… (WYNN) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 39.5 | -60.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDRO vs MGM vs DKNG vs WYNN vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 1.37x
- Beta 0.51, current ratio 1.37x
- Beta 0.51 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage
- 5.3% ROA vs CZR's -1.5%
MGM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 81.8% 10Y total return vs CZR's 302.6%
DKNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1%
WYNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 1.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 5.8% margin vs CZR's -4.2%
- 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, CZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs CZR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs CZR's -1.5% |
CDRO vs MGM vs DKNG vs WYNN vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CDRO vs MGM vs DKNG vs WYNN vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDRO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZR leads 1 • WYNN leads 1 • MGM leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CDRO and WYNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 88.3x CDRO's $201M. WYNN is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZR's -4.2%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $201M | $17.7B | $6.1B | $7.3B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $2.0B | $266M | $1.8B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $183M | $4M | $425M | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $1.7B | $612M | $872M | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.6% | +44.2% | +41.3% | +28.5% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +5.2% | -0.2% | +15.7% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +1.0% | +0.1% | +5.8% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +9.8% | +10.1% | +12.0% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +4.2% | +42.8% | +9.2% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -5.9% | +192.9% | +50.7% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.0x trailing earnings, WYNN trades at a 87% valuation discount to CDRO's 263.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $423M | $9.8B | $12.5B | $11.1B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $369M | $63.8B | $12.8B | $22.0B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 263.51x | 50.14x | -3113.58x | 34.03x | -11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.08x | 22.10x | 99.14x | 20.79x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 49.20x | 31.61x | 49.42x | 12.36x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.71x | 0.56x | 2.06x | 1.56x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.64x | 3.08x | 19.81x | — | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.93x | 5.85x | 19.31x | 16.10x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDRO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDRO delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CZR. CDRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs CZR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.1% | +5.3% | +0.5% | — | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +3.3% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.7% | -0.9% | +9.3% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.8% | +2.6% | -0.6% | +9.9% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 17.14x | 3.06x | — | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$46M | $54.1B | $330M | $10.8B | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $2.1B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $56.2B | $1.9B | $12.3B | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.52x | 1.92x | 2.82x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CDRO and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGM five years ago would be worth $9,551 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,627 for CZR. Over the past 12 months, WYNN leads with a +28.2% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDRO at 51.0% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +4.4% | -29.3% | -12.6% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.3% | +20.1% | -27.3% | +28.2% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +244.1% | -12.3% | +4.3% | -2.6% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.0% | -4.5% | -47.9% | -13.0% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.3% | +81.8% | +157.3% | +34.8% | +302.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.0% | -4.3% | +1.4% | -0.9% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CDRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CDRO is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGM's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDRO currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 1.28x | 1.12x | 1.23x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.72 | $40.94 | $48.78 | $134.72 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.18 | $29.19 | $20.46 | $82.20 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +93.1% | +51.7% | +79.3% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 50.0 | 55.1 | 55.4 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 4.4M | 12.9M | 1.6M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
WYNN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CDRO as "Hold", MGM as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", WYNN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.2% upside for DKNG (target: $37) vs -8.5% for CDRO (target: $9). WYNN is the only dividend payer here at 1.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | $39.71 | $36.88 | $143.00 | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 36 | 48 | 45 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +12.6% | +6.6% | +3.4% | +4.0% |
CDRO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). CZR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CDRO vs MGM vs DKNG vs WYNN vs CZR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MGM Resorts International (MGM) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR?
On trailing P/E, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the cheapest at 34.
0x versus Codere Online Luxembourg, S. A. at 263. 5x. On forward P/E, Wynn Resorts, Limited is actually cheaper at 20. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, MGM Resorts International (MGM) delivered a total return of -4.
5%, compared to -73. 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +302. 6% versus CDRO's -9. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Codere Online Luxembourg, S.
A. (CDRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 28β — meaning MGM is approximately 148% more volatile than CDRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Codere Online Luxembourg, S. A. (CDRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -87. 6% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR?
Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
6% net margin versus -4. 4% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDRO leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) trades at 20.
8x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 78. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 46. 2% to $36. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR?
In this comparison, WYNN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CDRO, MGM, DKNG, CZR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CDRO or MGM or DKNG or WYNN or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Codere Online Luxembourg, S.
A. (CDRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDRO: -9. 3%, MGM: +81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDRO and MGM and DKNG and WYNN and CZR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CDRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WYNN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WYNN pays a dividend while CDRO, MGM, DKNG, CZR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.