Waste Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CDTG vs CLFD vs PESI vs ECVT vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Waste Management
Chemicals - Specialty
Waste Management
CDTG vs CLFD vs PESI vs ECVT vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Communication Equipment | Waste Management | Chemicals - Specialty | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $3M | $519M | $207M | $1.53B | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $136M | $59M | $819M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-9M | $-18M | $-63M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 37.2% | 4.1% | 22.6% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 1.4% | -26.3% | 15.4% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 72.1x | — | 22.9x | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $9M | $4M | $431M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124K | $21M | $12M | $197M | $124M |
CDTG vs CLFD vs PESI vs ECVT vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDT Environmental T… (CDTG) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
| Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDTG vs CLFD vs PESI vs ECVT vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDTG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 63.9x)
- 19.8% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
- 8.0% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs -21.7%
CLFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
- 19.6% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0%
Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ECVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.90
- Beta 0.90, current ratio 2.64x
- +102.7% vs CDTG's -61.7%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- Beta 0.32 vs PESI's 1.85
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.8% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.7% vs CDTG's -61.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs -21.7% |
CDTG vs CLFD vs PESI vs ECVT vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CDTG vs CLFD vs PESI vs ECVT vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ECVT leads in 3 of 6 categories
CDTG leads 1 • CLFD leads 1 • PESI leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 52.1x CDTG's $36M. CDTG is the more profitable business, keeping 19.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, ECVT holds the edge at +32.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $136M | $59M | $819M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $6M | -$14M | $136M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$9M | -$18M | -$63M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $15M | -$14M | $84M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +37.2% | +4.1% | +22.6% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +1.4% | -26.3% | +15.4% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | -6.3% | -30.1% | -7.7% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +10.8% | -23.4% | +10.2% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.3% | -27.1% | -20.1% | +32.6% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -142.5% | -110.5% | +2.3% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CDTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, CDTG trades at a 100% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDTG's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $519M | $207M | $1.5B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $506M | $200M | $1.8B | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.99x | -64.64x | -14.89x | -22.90x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.10x | — | 22.87x | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.65x | 61.46x | — | 13.28x | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 3.46x | 3.36x | 2.11x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 2.05x | 4.11x | 2.68x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.01x | — | 21.87x | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDTG delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | -3.4% | -34.5% | -10.2% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | -3.0% | -20.2% | -4.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +0.6% | -21.7% | +4.2% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +0.8% | -16.7% | +4.6% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.03x | 0.09x | 0.71x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$13M | -$7M | $234M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124,379 | $21M | $12M | $197M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $9M | $4M | $431M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 52.81x | 85.32x | -42.14x | 2.08x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $844 for CDTG. Over the past 12 months, ECVT leads with a +102.7% total return vs CDTG's -61.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECVT at 9.9% vs CDTG's -56.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | +27.1% | -8.8% | +40.9% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.7% | +20.2% | +26.2% | +102.7% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | +3.9% | +21.7% | +32.9% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -4.1% | +45.6% | +15.4% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | +106.7% | +178.6% | +9.9% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.1% | +1.3% | +6.8% | +9.9% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECVT and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECVT currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs CDTG's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 1.79x | 1.85x | 0.90x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.13 | $46.76 | $16.50 | $14.94 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $24.01 | $8.02 | $6.69 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.1% | +80.2% | +67.7% | +93.5% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.0 | 57.1 | 41.5 | 66.9 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 619K | 146K | 164K | 2.2M | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
ECVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", ECVT as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs -30.8% for ECVT (target: $10).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 | $18.00 | $9.67 | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 1 | 6 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +19.9% | +3.2% | 0.0% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
ECVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CDTG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CDTG vs CLFD vs PESI vs ECVT vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST?
On trailing P/E, CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the cheapest at 2.
0x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Ecovyst Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -91. 6% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus CDTG's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 472% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -916. 7% for Ecovyst Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST?
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
9% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECVT leads at 9. 0% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDTG leads at 37. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) trades at 22. 9x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 49. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CDTG or CLFD or PESI or ECVT or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDTG and CLFD and PESI and ECVT and CWST?
These companies operate in different sectors (CDTG (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and PESI (Industrials) and ECVT (Basic Materials) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CDTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ECVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.