Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CDTG vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
CDTG vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $3M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124K | $124M |
CDTG vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDT Environmental T… (CDTG) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDTG vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDTG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 15.1%, current ratio 1.50x
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 63.9x)
- 19.8% margin vs CWST's 0.4%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs CDTG's -91.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.8% margin vs CWST's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs CDTG's 0.34 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -28.9% vs CDTG's -61.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs CWST's 0.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs 2.6% |
CDTG vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CDTG vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CDTG and CWST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 52.1x CDTG's $36M. CDTG is the more profitable business, keeping 19.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWST's 0.4%. On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.3% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CDTG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, CDTG trades at a 100% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDTG's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.99x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.65x | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDTG leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDTG delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWST. CDTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124,379 | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 52.81x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWST five years ago would be worth $12,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $844 for CDTG. Over the past 12 months, CWST leads with a -28.9% total return vs CDTG's -61.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWST at -2.2% vs CDTG's -56.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.7% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.1% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CWST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDTG's 0.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs CDTG's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.13 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.1% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.0 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 619K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +19.9% | 0.0% |
CDTG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CWST leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CDTG vs CWST: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDTG or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDTG or CWST?
On trailing P/E, CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the cheapest at 2.
0x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDTG or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) delivered a total return of +25. 7%, compared to -91. 6% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus CDTG's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDTG or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares's 0. 34β — meaning CDTG is approximately 7% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDTG or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Casella Waste Systems, Inc. grew EPS -47. 8% year-over-year, compared to -79. 7% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDTG or CWST?
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
9% net margin versus 0. 4% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDTG leads at 6. 7% versus 4. 9% for CWST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDTG leads at 37. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CDTG or CWST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CDTG or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, CDTG: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CDTG and CWST?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CDTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.