Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CDTG
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-91.8%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.-5.5%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$86.87B
5Y Perf.+3.5%
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$61.80B
5Y Perf.+4.3%

CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CDTG logoCDTG
CWST logoCWST
WM logoWM
RSG logoRSG
IndustryWaste ManagementWaste ManagementWaste ManagementWaste Management
Market Cap$3M$5.35B$86.87B$61.80B
Revenue (TTM)$36M$1.88B$25.41B$16.70B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$7M$2.79B$2.17B
Gross Margin35.2%17.4%32.1%31.5%
Operating Margin23.5%4.5%18.5%20.0%
Forward P/E2.0x62.7x26.3x27.6x
Total Debt$6M$1.24B$22.91B$596M
Cash & Equiv.$124K$124M$201M$76M

CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CDTG
CWST
WM
RSG
StockApr 24May 26Return
CDT Environmental T… (CDTG)1008.2-91.8%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)10094.5-5.5%
Waste Management, I… (WM)100103.5+3.5%
Republic Services, … (RSG)100104.3+4.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CDTG and CWST are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. WM and RSG also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CDTG
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares
The Quality Compounder

CDTG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 19.8% margin vs CWST's 0.4%
  • 8.0% ROA vs CWST's 0.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs 2.6%
Best for: quality and efficiency
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.33, current ratio 1.26x
  • 18.0% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
The Income Pick

WM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta -0.21, yield 1.5%
  • 1.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs RSG's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • -6.2% vs CDTG's -60.0%
Best for: income & stability
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

RSG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 350.5% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
  • PEG 1.55 vs WM's 1.91
  • PEG 1.55 vs 1.91
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWST logoCWST18.0% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0%
ValueRSG logoRSGPEG 1.55 vs 1.91
Quality / MarginsCDTG logoCDTG19.8% margin vs CWST's 0.4%
Stability / SafetyCWST logoCWSTBeta 0.33 vs CDTG's 0.40
DividendsWM logoWM1.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs RSG's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)WM logoWM-6.2% vs CDTG's -60.0%
Efficiency (ROA)CDTG logoCDTG8.0% ROA vs CWST's 0.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs 2.6%

CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CDTGCDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares

Segment breakdown not available.

CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M
WMWaste Management, Inc.
FY 2025
Commercial
21.5%$6.5B
Landfill
17.6%$5.3B
Industrial
13.1%$4.0B
Residential
11.8%$3.6B
Other Collection
11.4%$3.5B
Healthcare Solutions
9.7%$3.0B
Transfer
8.7%$2.6B
Other (1)
6.1%$1.9B
RSGRepublic Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection Service Line
44.7%$11.2B
Collection Service Line - Small-container
20.1%$5.1B
Collection Service Line - Large-container
12.3%$3.1B
Collection Service Line - Residential
12.0%$3.0B
Environmental Solutions Service Line
7.3%$1.8B
Other Service Line - Sale Of Recycled Commodities
1.7%$433M
Other Service Line - Other Non-core
1.6%$391M
Other (1)
0.3%$70M

CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDTGLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CDTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WM is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.4B annually — 705.1x CDTG's $36M. CDTG is the more profitable business, keeping 19.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWST's 0.4%. On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCDTG logoCDTGCDT Environmental…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…WM logoWMWaste Management,…RSG logoRSGRepublic Services…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$36M$1.9B$25.4B$16.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9M$414M$7.7B$5.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$7M$2.8B$2.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$102M$3.3B$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.2%+17.4%+32.1%+31.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.5%+4.5%+18.5%+20.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.8%+0.4%+11.0%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.8%+5.5%+12.9%+15.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-87.3%+9.6%+3.5%+2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-18.6%+13.3%+7.6%
CDTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, CDTG trades at a 100% valuation discount to CWST's 712.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RSG offers better value at 1.64x vs WM's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCDTG logoCDTGCDT Environmental…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…WM logoWMWaste Management,…RSG logoRSGRepublic Services…
Market CapShares × price$3M$5.4B$86.9B$61.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9M$6.5B$109.6B$62.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.02x712.00x32.14x29.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.70x26.29x27.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x1.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.67x15.74x14.67x11.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x2.91x3.45x3.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.08x3.46x8.71x5.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF63.16x30.85x25.65x
CDTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CDTG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

WM delivers a 28.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWST. RSG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WM's 2.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RSG scores 8/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCDTG logoCDTGCDT Environmental…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…WM logoWMWaste Management,…RSG logoRSGRepublic Services…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.1%+0.5%+28.9%+18.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.0%+0.2%+6.1%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.6%+2.6%+10.7%+13.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.7%+2.9%+11.7%+11.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94478
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.15x0.79x2.29x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M$1.1B$22.7B$520M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$124,379$124M$201M$76M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$1.2B$22.9B$596M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense52.81x1.12x4.89x8.35x
CDTG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RSG five years ago would be worth $18,795 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $858 for CDTG. Over the past 12 months, WM leads with a -6.2% total return vs CDTG's -60.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSG at 12.4% vs CDTG's -55.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCDTG logoCDTGCDT Environmental…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…WM logoWMWaste Management,…RSG logoRSGRepublic Services…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.5%-13.4%-1.0%-4.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-60.0%-27.9%-6.2%-18.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.4%-6.3%+32.9%+41.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.4%+26.6%+60.4%+88.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.4%+1059.3%+291.1%+350.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-55.9%-2.2%+10.0%+12.4%
RSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WM is the less volatile stock with a -0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDTG's 0.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WM currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs CDTG's 13.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCDTG logoCDTGCDT Environmental…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…WM logoWMWaste Management,…RSG logoRSGRepublic Services…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.40x0.33x-0.21x-0.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.13$121.04$248.13$258.75
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.21$74.05$194.11$198.24
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.3%+70.6%+86.8%+77.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.054.339.835.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded620K849K1.9M1.4M
WM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CWST as "Buy", WM as "Buy", RSG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.5% upside for CWST (target: $112) vs 18.2% for WM (target: $255). For income investors, WM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.53% vs RSG's 1.18%.

MetricCDTG logoCDTGCDT Environmental…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…WM logoWMWaste Management,…RSG logoRSGRepublic Services…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$112.33$254.67$239.89
# AnalystsCovering analysts193535
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12423
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.30$2.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+19.6%0.0%0.0%+1.4%
WM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CDTG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WM leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallCDT Environmental Technolog… (CDTG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?

On trailing P/E, CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the cheapest at 2.

0x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 0x. On forward P/E, Waste Management, Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Republic Services, Inc. wins at 1. 55x versus Waste Management, Inc. 's 1. 91x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?

Over the past 5 years, Republic Services, Inc.

(RSG) delivered a total return of +88. 0%, compared to -91. 4% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus CDTG's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Waste Management, Inc.

(WM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 21β versus CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares's 0. 40β — meaning CDTG is approximately -292% more volatile than WM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Waste Management, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Republic Services, Inc. grew EPS 5. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 7% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?

Republic Services, Inc.

(RSG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 0. 4% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSG leads at 20. 0% versus 4. 9% for CWST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSG leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 55x versus Waste Management, Inc. 's 1. 91x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Waste Management, Inc. (WM) trades at 26. 3x forward P/E versus 62. 7x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 36. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWST: 31. 5% to $112. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?

In this comparison, WM (1.

5% yield), RSG (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CDTG, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Republic Services, Inc.

(RSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18), 1. 2% yield, +350. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSG: +350. 5%, CDTG: -91. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CDTG and CWST and WM and RSG?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CDTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; WM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RSG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WM, RSG pay a dividend while CDTG, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CDTG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RSG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CDTG and CWST and WM and RSG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CDTG: -87.3% · CWST: 9.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CDTG: 2.0x · CWST: 712.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.