Waste Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Waste Management
Waste Management
CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $3M | $5.35B | $86.87B | $61.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $1.88B | $25.41B | $16.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $7M | $2.79B | $2.17B |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 17.4% | 32.1% | 31.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 4.5% | 18.5% | 20.0% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 62.7x | 26.3x | 27.6x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.24B | $22.91B | $596M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124K | $124M | $201M | $76M |
CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDT Environmental T… (CDTG) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
| Waste Management, I… (WM) | 100 | 103.5 | +3.5% |
| Republic Services, … (RSG) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDTG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 19.8% margin vs CWST's 0.4%
- 8.0% ROA vs CWST's 0.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs 2.6%
CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 1.26x
- 18.0% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0%
WM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta -0.21, yield 1.5%
- 1.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs RSG's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- -6.2% vs CDTG's -60.0%
RSG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 350.5% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
- PEG 1.55 vs WM's 1.91
- PEG 1.55 vs 1.91
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0% | |
| Value | PEG 1.55 vs 1.91 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.8% margin vs CWST's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs CDTG's 0.40 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs RSG's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.2% vs CDTG's -60.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs CWST's 0.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs 2.6% |
CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDTG leads in 3 of 6 categories
WM leads 2 • RSG leads 1 • CWST leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WM is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.4B annually — 705.1x CDTG's $36M. CDTG is the more profitable business, keeping 19.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWST's 0.4%. On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $1.9B | $25.4B | $16.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $414M | $7.7B | $5.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $7M | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $102M | $3.3B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +17.4% | +32.1% | +31.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +4.5% | +18.5% | +20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +0.4% | +11.0% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +5.5% | +12.9% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.3% | +9.6% | +3.5% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -18.6% | +13.3% | +7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CDTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, CDTG trades at a 100% valuation discount to CWST's 712.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RSG offers better value at 1.64x vs WM's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $5.4B | $86.9B | $61.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $6.5B | $109.6B | $62.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.02x | 712.00x | 32.14x | 29.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 62.70x | 26.29x | 27.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.34x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.67x | 15.74x | 14.67x | 11.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 2.91x | 3.45x | 3.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 3.46x | 8.71x | 5.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.16x | 30.85x | 25.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDTG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WM delivers a 28.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWST. RSG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WM's 2.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RSG scores 8/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +0.5% | +28.9% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +0.2% | +6.1% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +2.6% | +10.7% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +2.9% | +11.7% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.79x | 2.29x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $1.1B | $22.7B | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124,379 | $124M | $201M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.2B | $22.9B | $596M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 52.81x | 1.12x | 4.89x | 8.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSG five years ago would be worth $18,795 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $858 for CDTG. Over the past 12 months, WM leads with a -6.2% total return vs CDTG's -60.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSG at 12.4% vs CDTG's -55.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.5% | -13.4% | -1.0% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.0% | -27.9% | -6.2% | -18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | -6.3% | +32.9% | +41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | +26.6% | +60.4% | +88.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | +1059.3% | +291.1% | +350.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.9% | -2.2% | +10.0% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
WM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WM is the less volatile stock with a -0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDTG's 0.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WM currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs CDTG's 13.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 0.33x | -0.21x | -0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.13 | $121.04 | $248.13 | $258.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $74.05 | $194.11 | $198.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.3% | +70.6% | +86.8% | +77.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 54.3 | 39.8 | 35.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 620K | 849K | 1.9M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
WM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWST as "Buy", WM as "Buy", RSG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.5% upside for CWST (target: $112) vs 18.2% for WM (target: $255). For income investors, WM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.53% vs RSG's 1.18%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $112.33 | $254.67 | $239.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 35 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.5% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 24 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.30 | $2.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +19.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
CDTG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WM leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
CDTG vs CWST vs WM vs RSG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?
On trailing P/E, CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the cheapest at 2.
0x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 0x. On forward P/E, Waste Management, Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Republic Services, Inc. wins at 1. 55x versus Waste Management, Inc. 's 1. 91x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?
Over the past 5 years, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) delivered a total return of +88. 0%, compared to -91. 4% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus CDTG's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Waste Management, Inc.
(WM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 21β versus CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares's 0. 40β — meaning CDTG is approximately -292% more volatile than WM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Waste Management, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Republic Services, Inc. grew EPS 5. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 7% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?
Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 0. 4% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSG leads at 20. 0% versus 4. 9% for CWST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSG leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 55x versus Waste Management, Inc. 's 1. 91x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Waste Management, Inc. (WM) trades at 26. 3x forward P/E versus 62. 7x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 36. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWST: 31. 5% to $112. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG?
In this comparison, WM (1.
5% yield), RSG (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CDTG, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CDTG or CWST or WM or RSG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18), 1. 2% yield, +350. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSG: +350. 5%, CDTG: -91. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDTG and CWST and WM and RSG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CDTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; WM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RSG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WM, RSG pay a dividend while CDTG, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.