Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CEPO vs PSFE vs ACIC vs BX vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Asset Management
Asset Management
CEPO vs PSFE vs ACIC vs BX vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $217M | $485M | $525M | $95.85B | $89.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B | $335M | $13.83B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-183M | $107M | $3.02B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% | 63.8% | 86.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% | 42.6% | 51.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x | 7.3x | 20.5x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $486K | $2.66B | $152M | $13.31B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $1.35B | $199M | $2.63B | $6M |
CEPO vs PSFE vs ACIC vs BX vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantor Equity Partn… (CEPO) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 89.0 | -11.0% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 60.1 | -39.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CEPO vs PSFE vs ACIC vs BX vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CEPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 0.26x
- NIM 3.6% vs KKR's 0.0%
- 5.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
- Beta 0.08 vs PSFE's 2.35, lower leverage
PSFE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 20.5x)
ACIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.1%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 31.9% margin vs PSFE's -10.7%
- -0.3% vs PSFE's -37.1%
- 9.0% ROA vs CEPO's -5.7%, ROIC 41.0% vs -0.8%
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 6.3%
- Beta 1.53, yield 6.3%, current ratio 0.91x
- 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BX's 476.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs PSFE's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.3% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs CEPO's -5.7%, ROIC 41.0% vs -0.8% |
CEPO vs PSFE vs ACIC vs BX vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CEPO vs PSFE vs ACIC vs BX vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • CEPO leads 0 • BX leads 0 • KKR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR and CEPO operate at a comparable scale, with $19.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, ACIC holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $335M | $13.8B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $371M | $154M | $7.2B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$183M | $107M | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1 | $136M | $71M | $3.5B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% | +63.8% | +86.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% | +42.6% | +51.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% | +31.9% | +21.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% | +21.1% | +12.6% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +9.3% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | -183.3% | +4.3% | +41.3% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.0x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 88% valuation discount to KKR's 42.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACIC's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $217M | $485M | $525M | $95.8B | $89.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $217M | $1.8B | $478M | $106.5B | $144.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.65x | -2.99x | 5.05x | 31.53x | 42.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x | 7.33x | 20.50x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.53x | 2.93x | 14.77x | 20.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x | 1.56x | 6.93x | 4.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 0.83x | 1.70x | 4.37x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4121.21x | 2.17x | 7.40x | 54.93x | 9.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. CEPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CEPO scores 6/9 vs PSFE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | -24.1% | +35.7% | +14.3% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | -3.8% | +9.0% | +6.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +3.6% | +41.0% | +16.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +3.6% | +26.0% | +16.9% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 4.06x | 0.48x | 0.61x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $460,504 | $1.3B | -$46M | $10.7B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,000 | $1.3B | $199M | $2.6B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $485,504 | $2.7B | $152M | $13.3B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x | 14.20x | 14.12x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, ACIC leads with a -0.3% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIC at 37.3% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +17.7% | +1.9% | -21.3% | -22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.3% | -37.1% | -0.3% | -6.5% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | -34.9% | +159.1% | +65.9% | +107.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | -94.2% | +107.0% | +59.0% | +76.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | -92.1% | -22.2% | +476.1% | +715.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | -13.3% | +37.3% | +18.4% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CEPO and ACIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CEPO is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACIC currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.08x | 2.35x | 0.39x | 1.53x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $16.49 | $13.06 | $190.09 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.27 | $5.95 | $9.79 | $101.73 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +56.9% | +83.1% | +64.3% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 65.3 | 31.0 | 54.8 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 361K | 188K | 7.1M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.5% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.30% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $1.90 | $156.29 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 5 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +6.3% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $7.70 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CEPO vs PSFE vs ACIC vs BX vs KKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 5. 0x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR?
On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 5.
0x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 42. 9x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.
0%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 08β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 2934% more volatile than CEPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Coastal Insurance Corporation grew EPS 40. 5% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR?
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
8% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 0. 0% for CEPO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Blackstone Inc. — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 42. 5% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR?
In this comparison, BX (6.
3% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CEPO, PSFE, ACIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CEPO or PSFE or ACIC or BX or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 08)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CEPO: +5. 2%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CEPO and PSFE and ACIC and BX and KKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CEPO (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and ACIC (Financial Services) and BX (Financial Services) and KKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CEPO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BX, KKR pay a dividend while CEPO, PSFE, ACIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.