Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CETX vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs KEYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
CETX vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs KEYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Conglomerates | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $117K | $136.91B | $79.02B | $50.37B | $60.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $36.76B | $18.32B | $8.80B | $5.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $4.10B | $2.44B | $1.09B | $958M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 36.9% | 52.7% | 52.5% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | 14.9% | 19.8% | 19.1% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.5x | 21.7x | 36.9x | 39.8x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $34.58B | $13.76B | $3.65B | $2.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $12.49B | $1.54B | $468M | $1.87B |
CETX vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs KEYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cemtrex, Inc. (CETX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
| Rockwell Automation… (ROK) | 100 | 207.4 | +107.4% |
| Keysight Technologi… (KEYS) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CETX vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs KEYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CETX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.4%, EPS growth -175.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 14.4% revenue growth vs ROK's 1.0%
HON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (20.5x vs 39.8x)
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 4.81 vs HON's 11.18
ROK is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 9.7% ROA vs CETX's -32.6%, ROIC 15.1% vs 1.7%
KEYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs ROK's 341.0%
- 16.9% margin vs CETX's -24.9%
- +137.2% vs CETX's -96.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.4% revenue growth vs ROK's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 39.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs CETX's -24.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs CETX's 3.10 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.2% vs CETX's -96.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs CETX's -32.6%, ROIC 15.1% vs 1.7% |
CETX vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs KEYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CETX vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs KEYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KEYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
CETX leads 1 • ROK leads 1 • HON leads 0 • EMR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.8B annually — 466.1x CETX's $79M. KEYS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CETX's -24.9%. On growth, KEYS holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $36.8B | $18.3B | $8.8B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $6.5B | $4.7B | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $4.1B | $2.4B | $1.1B | $958M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$721,474 | $4.2B | $3.1B | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +36.9% | +52.7% | +52.5% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +14.9% | +19.8% | +19.1% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.9% | +11.2% | +13.3% | +12.4% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +11.4% | +17.0% | +15.2% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | -6.9% | +2.9% | +11.8% | +23.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.8% | -41.9% | +28.2% | +39.6% | +68.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CETX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.4x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 60% valuation discount to KEYS's 72.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EMR offers better value at 7.73x vs HON's 15.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116,707 | $136.9B | $79.0B | $50.4B | $60.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $159.0B | $91.2B | $53.6B | $62.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 29.36x | 34.92x | 58.45x | 72.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.52x | 21.71x | 36.93x | 39.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 15.99x | 7.73x | — | 9.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.32x | 19.99x | 18.07x | 30.64x | 50.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 3.66x | 4.39x | 6.04x | 11.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 9.00x | 3.94x | 13.66x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.39x | 29.63x | 37.09x | 47.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ROK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROK delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-68 for CETX. KEYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROK scores 8/9 vs CETX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -67.6% | +23.1% | +12.1% | +29.6% | +15.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.6% | +5.3% | +5.8% | +9.7% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +12.6% | +8.2% | +15.1% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +12.6% | +10.0% | +18.5% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.15x | 2.24x | 0.68x | 0.98x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $22.1B | $12.2B | $3.2B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $12.5B | $1.5B | $468M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $34.6B | $13.8B | $3.6B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.00x | 3.92x | 6.46x | 9.06x | 11.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KEYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KEYS five years ago would be worth $24,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for CETX. Over the past 12 months, KEYS leads with a +137.2% total return vs CETX's -96.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KEYS at 35.3% vs CETX's -98.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.8% | +10.9% | +4.3% | +12.8% | +71.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.0% | +2.8% | +30.4% | +60.2% | +137.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +16.2% | +75.9% | +65.0% | +147.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +3.3% | +59.5% | +74.6% | +147.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +135.1% | +206.6% | +341.0% | +1279.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.2% | +5.1% | +20.7% | +18.2% | +35.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HON and ROK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CETX's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROK currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs CETX's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.10x | 0.74x | 1.52x | 1.33x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.60 | $248.18 | $165.15 | $463.49 | $367.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $186.76 | $108.37 | $277.66 | $146.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +87.1% | +85.4% | +96.7% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 45.1 | 61.3 | 74.9 | 75.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 3.7M | 2.8M | 831K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HON and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HON as "Buy", EMR as "Buy", ROK as "Hold", KEYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for EMR (target: $162) vs -18.5% for KEYS (target: $289). For income investors, HON offers the higher dividend yield at 2.14% vs ROK's 1.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $243.83 | $161.92 | $436.56 | $289.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 41 | 39 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +1.5% | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 | 37 | 20 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.63 | $2.10 | $5.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% | +1.6% | +0.8% | +0.6% |
KEYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CETX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CETX vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs KEYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cemtrex, Inc.
(CETX) is the stronger pick with 14. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Honeywell International Inc. (HON) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 4x versus Keysight Technologies, Inc. at 72. 7x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Emerson Electric Co. wins at 4. 81x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS?
Over the past 5 years, Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) delivered a total return of +147. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Cemtrex, Inc. (CETX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEYS returned +1279% versus CETX's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Cemtrex, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning CETX is approximately 318% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cemtrex, Inc.
(CETX) is pulling ahead at 14. 4% versus 1. 0% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Keysight Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 39. 0% year-over-year, compared to -175. 7% for Cemtrex, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CETX leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS?
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 7% net margin versus -36. 4% for Cemtrex, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus 0. 7% for CETX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KEYS leads at 62. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 81x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc. (HON) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Keysight Technologies, Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 8% to $161. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS?
In this comparison, HON (2.
1% yield), EMR (1. 5% yield), ROK (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CETX, KEYS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CETX or HON or EMR or ROK or KEYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 1% yield, +135. 1% 10Y return). Cemtrex, Inc. (CETX) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HON: +135. 1%, CETX: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CETX and HON and EMR and ROK and KEYS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CETX (Technology) and HON (Industrials) and EMR (Industrials) and ROK (Industrials) and KEYS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
HON, EMR, ROK pay a dividend while CETX, KEYS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.