Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CGAU vs EGO vs CDE vs HL vs PAAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Gold
Silver
CGAU vs EGO vs CDE vs HL vs PAAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold | Silver |
| Market Cap | $3.54B | $6.55B | $11.63B | $12.13B | $24.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.54B | $1.82B | $2.57B | $1.57B | $4.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $636M | $510M | $799M | $559M | $1.27B |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 46.4% | 35.4% | 50.9% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 39.9% | 40.0% | 39.4% | 44.1% | 37.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 7.8x | 9.1x | 19.1x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $1.30B | $365M | $299M | $935M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $528M | $868M | $554M | $242M | $1.21B |
CGAU vs EGO vs CDE vs HL vs PAAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) | 100 | 175.2 | +75.2% |
| Eldorado Gold Corpo… (EGO) | 100 | 394.6 | +294.6% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
| Pan American Silver… (PAAS) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGAU vs EGO vs CDE vs HL vs PAAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGAU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 2.39x
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.39x
- 41.2% margin vs EGO's 28.0%
EGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.57 vs CDE's 1.81
CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- PEG 0.17 vs CGAU's 0.61
- 96.4% revenue growth vs CGAU's 9.5%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.17 vs 0.49
HL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs CGAU's 240.7%
- +271.0% vs EGO's +66.3%
Among these 5 stocks, PAAS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs CGAU's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.17 vs 0.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.2% margin vs EGO's 28.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs CDE's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PAAS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs EGO's +66.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.1% ROA vs EGO's 8.0%, ROIC 13.6% vs 13.3% |
CGAU vs EGO vs CDE vs HL vs PAAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CGAU vs EGO vs CDE vs HL vs PAAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDE leads in 1 of 6 categories
EGO leads 1 • CGAU leads 1 • HL leads 0 • PAAS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 2.6x CGAU's $1.5B. CGAU is the more profitable business, keeping 41.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGO's 28.0%. On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.8B | $2.6B | $1.6B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $738M | $993M | $1.2B | $853M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $636M | $510M | $799M | $559M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | -$184M | $915M | $472M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +46.4% | +35.4% | +50.9% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +40.0% | +39.4% | +44.1% | +37.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +28.0% | +31.1% | +35.6% | +31.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | -10.1% | +35.6% | +30.0% | +34.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.8% | +34.5% | +137.8% | +57.4% | +49.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +134.6% | +4.9% | -160.0% | +134.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EGO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, CGAU trades at a 83% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs PAAS's 0.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $6.6B | $11.6B | $12.1B | $24.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $7.0B | $11.4B | $12.2B | $24.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.14x | 13.21x | 20.13x | 36.92x | 22.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.08x | 7.76x | 9.10x | 19.07x | 12.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.42x | 0.49x | 0.39x | — | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.31x | 6.72x | 11.19x | 17.25x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.67x | 3.54x | 5.62x | 8.53x | 6.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.77x | 1.59x | 3.56x | 4.58x | 3.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.47x | — | 17.48x | 39.11x | 22.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CGAU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CGAU delivers a 32.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $12 for EGO. CGAU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGO's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs CGAU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.6% | +12.4% | +15.2% | +22.5% | +19.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.1% | +8.0% | +11.2% | +16.3% | +14.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | +13.3% | +23.5% | +15.3% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | +13.5% | +23.9% | +16.8% | +15.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.30x | 0.11x | 0.12x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$498M | $428M | -$188M | $57M | -$277M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $528M | $868M | $554M | $242M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $1.3B | $365M | $299M | $935M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 51.90x | 20.66x | 47.33x | 19.04x | 23.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGO five years ago would be worth $29,798 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,139 for PAAS. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs EGO's +66.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 72.6% vs CGAU's 38.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.9% | -6.2% | +3.2% | -4.1% | +13.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +146.3% | +66.3% | +216.1% | +271.0% | +137.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.1% | +178.5% | +414.6% | +194.9% | +229.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.3% | +198.0% | +96.0% | +150.3% | +71.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.7% | +58.6% | +149.9% | +360.6% | +326.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.6% | +40.7% | +72.6% | +43.4% | +48.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CGAU and EGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGO is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGAU currently trades 83.8% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.57x | 1.81x | 1.26x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.17 | $51.16 | $27.77 | $34.17 | $69.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.35 | $17.18 | $5.55 | $4.68 | $22.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +64.8% | +65.2% | +52.9% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 45.3 | 49.3 | 46.6 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 3.0M | 22.2M | 15.4M | 6.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CGAU and PAAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CGAU as "Buy", EGO as "Hold", CDE as "Buy", HL as "Hold", PAAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 7.0% for CGAU (target: $19). For income investors, CGAU offers the higher dividend yield at 1.15% vs PAAS's 0.81%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $52.67 | $29.00 | $23.83 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 24 | 21 | 26 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — | — | +0.1% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — | — | $0.01 | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +3.3% | +0.1% | +0.0% | +0.2% |
CDE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). EGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CGAU vs EGO vs CDE vs HL vs PAAS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 5% for Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU). Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS?
On trailing P/E, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Eldorado Gold Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 17x versus Centerra Gold Inc. 's 0. 61x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS?
Over the past 5 years, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) delivered a total return of +198.
0%, compared to +71. 4% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus EGO's +58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 220% more volatile than EGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Eldorado Gold Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 9. 5% for Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 78. 0% for Eldorado Gold Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS?
Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the more profitable company, earning 44. 7% net margin versus 22. 6% for Hecla Mining Company — meaning it keeps 44. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EGO leads at 41. 5% versus 17. 9% for CGAU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EGO leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Centerra Gold Inc. 's 0. 61x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS?
In this comparison, CGAU (1.
1% yield), PAAS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. EGO, CDE, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CGAU or EGO or CDE or HL or PAAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 1. 1% yield, +240. 7% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CGAU: +240. 7%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CGAU and EGO and CDE and HL and PAAS?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CGAU is a small-cap deep-value stock; EGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CGAU, PAAS pay a dividend while EGO, CDE, HL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.