Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CGNT
Cognyte Software Ltd.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$793M
5Y Perf.+23.2%
NICE
NICE Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.-31.3%
VRNS
Varonis Systems, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.37B
5Y Perf.-33.3%
SAIL
SailPoint, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.85B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
SPOK
Spok Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$225M
5Y Perf.-35.7%

CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CGNT logoCGNT
NICE logoNICE
VRNS logoVRNS
SAIL logoSAIL
SPOK logoSPOK
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$793M$5.78B$3.37B$6.85B$225M
Revenue (TTM)$377M$2.95B$660M$1.02B$103M
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$612M$-137M$-297M$11M
Gross Margin70.9%66.4%78.1%66.0%91.4%
Operating Margin0.9%21.9%-21.9%-16.4%13.2%
Forward P/E46.9x8.7x242.2x16.4x
Total Debt$36M$164M$572M$1.05B$7M
Cash & Equiv.$113M$379M$202M$121M$25M

CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CGNT
NICE
VRNS
SAIL
SPOK
StockFeb 25May 26Return
Cognyte Software Lt… (CGNT)100123.2+23.2%
NICE Ltd. (NICE)10068.7-31.3%
Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS)10066.7-33.3%
SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL)10050.8-49.2%
Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK)10064.3-35.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Spok Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. CGNT and SAIL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CGNT
Cognyte Software Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

CGNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +13.4% vs NICE's -40.4%
Best for: momentum
NICE
NICE Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
  • Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
  • Lower P/E (8.7x vs 16.4x)
  • 20.8% margin vs SAIL's -29.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
VRNS
Varonis Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

VRNS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 317.5% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
SAIL
SailPoint, Inc.
The Growth Play

SAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 72.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.1%
  • 23.2% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5%
Best for: growth exposure
SPOK
Spok Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

SPOK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
  • Beta 0.42 vs SAIL's 1.81
  • 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAIL logoSAIL23.2% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5%
ValueNICE logoNICELower P/E (8.7x vs 16.4x)
Quality / MarginsNICE logoNICE20.8% margin vs SAIL's -29.2%
Stability / SafetySPOK logoSPOKBeta 0.42 vs SAIL's 1.81
DividendsSPOK logoSPOK11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CGNT logoCGNT+13.4% vs NICE's -40.4%
Efficiency (ROA)NICE logoNICE11.8% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 13.2% vs -11.0%

CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CGNTCognyte Software Ltd.
FY 2025
Technology Service
51.6%$181M
Product
35.9%$126M
Professional Services And Other
12.5%$44M
NICENICE Ltd.
FY 2025
Cloud
76.0%$2.2B
Service
19.0%$560M
Product
5.0%$147M
VRNSVaronis Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Software as a Service
74.2%$463M
Subscription and Circulation
17.6%$110M
Maintenance
8.2%$51M
SAILSailPoint, Inc.
FY 2022
Subscription
62.2%$273M
License
25.7%$113M
Technology Service
12.0%$53M
SPOKSpok Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Wireless Operations
28.2%$73M
Paging
26.6%$69M
Software Operations
26.1%$67M
License and Maintenance
14.2%$36M
License
2.9%$7M
Product and Service, Other
1.5%$4M
Hardware
0.5%$1M

CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNICELAGGINGSAIL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NICE and SPOK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

NICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 28.5x SPOK's $103M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIL's -29.2%. On growth, VRNS holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$377M$2.9B$660M$1.0B$103M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$16M$845M-$135M$42M$17M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M$612M-$137M-$297M$11M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$11M$665M$120M$6M$26M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.9%+66.4%+78.1%+66.0%+91.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.9%+21.9%-21.9%-16.4%+13.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.2%+20.8%-20.7%-29.2%+10.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.0%+22.6%+18.1%+0.6%+24.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.5%+9.0%+26.9%+19.8%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+173.6%+56.5%0.0%+85.4%-64.0%
Evenly matched — NICE and SPOK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NICE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 32% valuation discount to SPOK's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SAIL's 160.2x.

MetricCGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Market CapShares × price$793M$5.8B$3.4B$6.8B$225M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$715M$5.6B$3.7B$7.8B$206M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-64.71x9.89x-25.38x-6.16x14.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.46.93x8.74x242.23x16.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple83.91x6.59x160.20x8.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.26x1.96x5.40x7.95x1.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.64x1.56x6.19x1.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.59x8.22x24.99x8.91x
NICE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNS's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NICE scores 7/9 vs SAIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.0%+16.4%-27.4%-8.0%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.9%+11.8%-8.2%-4.0%+5.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.5%+13.2%-11.0%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.8%+16.1%-14.0%-2.7%+12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957556
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.04x0.96x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$77M-$216M$369M$926M-$18M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$113M$379M$202M$121M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$36M$164M$572M$1.0B$7M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense21.71x-9.01x-0.91x
NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CGNT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,090 for NICE. Over the past 12 months, CGNT leads with a +13.4% total return vs NICE's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CGNT at 36.8% vs NICE's -20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.6%-14.6%-10.5%-35.7%-14.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+13.4%-40.4%-36.7%-33.7%-26.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.8%-49.3%+23.7%-44.6%+13.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.7%-59.1%-39.9%-44.6%+61.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.7%+50.7%+317.5%-44.6%+13.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+36.8%-20.2%+7.3%-17.9%+4.3%
CGNT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CGNT and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIL's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGNT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x0.72x0.95x1.81x0.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.66$180.61$63.90$24.95$19.31
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.29$94.89$19.70$10.30$9.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.3%+53.0%+44.9%+48.9%+56.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.740.966.143.736.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded496K631K2.3M3.1M185K
Evenly matched — CGNT and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CGNT as "Hold", NICE as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy", SAIL as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.4% upside for SAIL (target: $22) vs -2.3% for CGNT (target: $11). SPOK is the only dividend payer here at 11.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.75$150.88$36.00$21.50$15.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts52334321
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises005
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+8.5%+3.4%+0.1%+1.3%
SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CGNT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallNICE Ltd. (NICE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SailPoint, Inc.

(SAIL) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NICE Ltd. (NICE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?

On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Spok Holdings, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, NICE Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?

Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to -59. 1% for NICE Ltd. (NICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRNS returned +317. 5% versus CGNT's -60. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus SailPoint, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SAIL is approximately 330% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 96% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SailPoint, Inc.

(SAIL) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SailPoint, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -31. 4% for Varonis Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAIL leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?

NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -36. 7% for SailPoint, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRNS leads at 79. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 233. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAIL: 76. 4% to $21. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?

In this comparison, SPOK (11.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CGNT, NICE, VRNS, SAIL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 3%, SAIL: -44. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CGNT and NICE and VRNS and SAIL and SPOK?

These companies operate in different sectors (CGNT (Technology) and NICE (Technology) and VRNS (Technology) and SAIL (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CGNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock. SPOK pays a dividend while CGNT, NICE, VRNS, SAIL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CGNT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VRNS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAIL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPOK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CGNT and NICE and VRNS and SAIL and SPOK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CGNT: 15.5% · NICE: 9.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.