Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $793M | $5.78B | $3.37B | $6.85B | $225M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $377M | $2.95B | $660M | $1.02B | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $612M | $-137M | $-297M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 66.4% | 78.1% | 66.0% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 21.9% | -21.9% | -16.4% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 46.9x | 8.7x | 242.2x | — | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $164M | $572M | $1.05B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $379M | $202M | $121M | $25M |
CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognyte Software Lt… (CGNT) | 100 | 123.2 | +23.2% |
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 68.7 | -31.3% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +13.4% vs NICE's -40.4%
NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 16.4x)
- 20.8% margin vs SAIL's -29.2%
VRNS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 317.5% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.3%
SAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 72.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.1%
- 23.2% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5%
SPOK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Beta 0.42 vs SAIL's 1.81
- 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs SAIL's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs SAIL's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.4% vs NICE's -40.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 13.2% vs -11.0% |
CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
CGNT leads 1 • SPOK leads 1 • VRNS leads 0 • SAIL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NICE and SPOK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 28.5x SPOK's $103M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIL's -29.2%. On growth, VRNS holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $377M | $2.9B | $660M | $1.0B | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $845M | -$135M | $42M | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $612M | -$137M | -$297M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | $665M | $120M | $6M | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +66.4% | +78.1% | +66.0% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +21.9% | -21.9% | -16.4% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +20.8% | -20.7% | -29.2% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +22.6% | +18.1% | +0.6% | +24.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.5% | +9.0% | +26.9% | +19.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +173.6% | +56.5% | 0.0% | +85.4% | -64.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NICE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 32% valuation discount to SPOK's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SAIL's 160.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $793M | $5.8B | $3.4B | $6.8B | $225M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $715M | $5.6B | $3.7B | $7.8B | $206M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -64.71x | 9.89x | -25.38x | -6.16x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 46.93x | 8.74x | 242.23x | — | 16.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 83.91x | 6.59x | — | 160.20x | 8.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.26x | 1.96x | 5.40x | 7.95x | 1.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.64x | 1.56x | 6.19x | — | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.59x | 8.22x | 24.99x | — | 8.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNS's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NICE scores 7/9 vs SAIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | +16.4% | -27.4% | -8.0% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | +11.8% | -8.2% | -4.0% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +13.2% | -11.0% | — | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | +16.1% | -14.0% | -2.7% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.04x | 0.96x | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$77M | -$216M | $369M | $926M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $379M | $202M | $121M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $164M | $572M | $1.0B | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 21.71x | — | -9.01x | -0.91x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CGNT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,090 for NICE. Over the past 12 months, CGNT leads with a +13.4% total return vs NICE's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CGNT at 36.8% vs NICE's -20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.6% | -14.6% | -10.5% | -35.7% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.4% | -40.4% | -36.7% | -33.7% | -26.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.8% | -49.3% | +23.7% | -44.6% | +13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.7% | -59.1% | -39.9% | -44.6% | +61.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.7% | +50.7% | +317.5% | -44.6% | +13.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.8% | -20.2% | +7.3% | -17.9% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CGNT and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIL's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGNT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.72x | 0.95x | 1.81x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.66 | $180.61 | $63.90 | $24.95 | $19.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.29 | $94.89 | $19.70 | $10.30 | $9.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +53.0% | +44.9% | +48.9% | +56.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 40.9 | 66.1 | 43.7 | 36.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 496K | 631K | 2.3M | 3.1M | 185K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CGNT as "Hold", NICE as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy", SAIL as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.4% upside for SAIL (target: $22) vs -2.3% for CGNT (target: $11). SPOK is the only dividend payer here at 11.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.75 | $150.88 | $36.00 | $21.50 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 23 | 34 | 32 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +11.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +8.5% | +3.4% | +0.1% | +1.3% |
NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CGNT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CGNT vs NICE vs VRNS vs SAIL vs SPOK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NICE Ltd. (NICE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?
On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Spok Holdings, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, NICE Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to -59. 1% for NICE Ltd. (NICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRNS returned +317. 5% versus CGNT's -60. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus SailPoint, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SAIL is approximately 330% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 96% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SailPoint, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -31. 4% for Varonis Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAIL leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?
NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -36. 7% for SailPoint, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRNS leads at 79. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 233. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAIL: 76. 4% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CGNT, NICE, VRNS, SAIL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CGNT or NICE or VRNS or SAIL or SPOK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 3%, SAIL: -44. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CGNT and NICE and VRNS and SAIL and SPOK?
These companies operate in different sectors (CGNT (Technology) and NICE (Technology) and VRNS (Technology) and SAIL (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CGNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock. SPOK pays a dividend while CGNT, NICE, VRNS, SAIL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.