Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CGTX vs LLY vs PFE vs BIIB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
CGTX vs LLY vs PFE vs BIIB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $85M | $921.16B | $150.63B | $28.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $72.25B | $63.31B | $9.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $25.27B | $7.49B | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% | 69.3% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 45.9% | 23.4% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.2x | 8.9x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $638K | $42.50B | $67.42B | $6.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $7.16B | $1.14B | $3.01B |
CGTX vs LLY vs PFE vs BIIB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognition Therapeut… (CGTX) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 382.7 | +282.7% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 60.5 | -39.5% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 71.8 | -28.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGTX vs LLY vs PFE vs BIIB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGTX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +227.0% vs PFE's +23.7%
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 12.4% 10Y total return vs PFE's 29.6%
- 44.7% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
- 35.0% margin vs CGTX's -0.0%
PFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 28.2x)
- Beta 0.54 vs CGTX's 3.40
BIIB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 28.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs CGTX's -0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs CGTX's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +227.0% vs PFE's +23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs CGTX's -69.6% |
CGTX vs LLY vs PFE vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CGTX vs LLY vs PFE vs BIIB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories
PFE leads 2 • CGTX leads 0 • BIIB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and CGTX operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFE's 11.8%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $72.2B | $63.3B | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$48M | $34.7B | $21.0B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $25.3B | $7.5B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$25M | $13.6B | $9.5B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% | +69.3% | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +45.9% | +23.4% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +35.0% | +11.8% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +18.8% | +15.0% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +55.5% | +5.4% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.9% | +169.9% | -9.5% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 54% valuation discount to LLY's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LLY's 30.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $921.2B | $150.6B | $28.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $956.5B | $216.9B | $32.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.63x | 42.48x | 19.47x | 21.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.24x | 8.94x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.47x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 30.60x | 10.66x | 11.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 14.13x | 2.41x | 2.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.46x | 32.99x | 1.74x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 102.67x | 16.60x | 13.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-104 for CGTX. CGTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs CGTX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -104.3% | +101.2% | +8.3% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -69.6% | +22.7% | +3.6% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +41.8% | +7.5% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -178.5% | +46.6% | +9.0% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 1.60x | 0.78x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $35.3B | $66.3B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $7.2B | $1.1B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $638,000 | $42.5B | $67.4B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2600.54x | 35.68x | 4.02x | 6.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $908 for CGTX. Over the past 12 months, CGTX leads with a +227.0% total return vs PFE's +23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 31.8% vs BIIB's -15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.1% | -9.6% | +6.9% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +227.0% | +26.3% | +23.7% | +63.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.0% | +129.1% | -18.4% | -39.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | +411.1% | -13.3% | -30.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | +1237.7% | +29.6% | -29.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.4% | +31.8% | -6.6% | -15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFE and BIIB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CGTX's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs CGTX's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.40x | 0.71x | 0.54x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.83 | $1133.95 | $28.75 | $202.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $623.78 | $21.97 | $115.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.3% | +86.0% | +92.1% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 61.4 | 44.2 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.6M | 33.3M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CGTX as "Buy", LLY as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", BIIB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.1% upside for LLY (target: $1258) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs LLY's 0.61%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1258.47 | $27.27 | $211.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 45 | 39 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +6.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $1.72 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CGTX vs LLY vs PFE vs BIIB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cognition Therapeutics, Inc. (CGTX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB?
On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus Eli Lilly and Company at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +411.
1%, compared to -90. 9% for Cognition Therapeutics, Inc. (CGTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1238% versus CGTX's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Cognition Therapeutics, Inc. 's 3. 40β — meaning CGTX is approximately 525% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cognition Therapeutics, Inc. (CGTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 160% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cognition Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 0. 0% for CGTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 2x for Eli Lilly and Company — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LLY: 29. 1% to $1258. 47.
08Which pays a better dividend — CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), LLY (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CGTX, BIIB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CGTX or LLY or PFE or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 6% yield, +1238% 10Y return). Cognition Therapeutics, Inc. (CGTX) carries a higher beta of 3. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1238%, CGTX: -90. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CGTX and LLY and PFE and BIIB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CGTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a large-cap high-growth stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LLY, PFE pay a dividend while CGTX, BIIB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.