Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CHA vs NFLX vs DIS vs MNTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Advertising Agencies
CHA vs NFLX vs DIS vs MNTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Entertainment | Entertainment | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $1.32B | $374.00B | $192.60B | $724M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.27B | $45.18B | $97.26B | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.80B | $10.98B | $11.22B | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 80.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | 24.8x | 16.5x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $548M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.75B | $9.03B | $5.70B | $210M |
CHA vs NFLX vs DIS vs MNTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
| MNTN Inc. (MNTN) | 100 | 36.4 | -63.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHA vs NFLX vs DIS vs MNTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 167.4%, EPS growth 214.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 19.9%, current ratio 2.37x
- 167.4% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4%
- Lower P/E (1.2x vs 9.9x)
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs DIS's 11.8%
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- 24.3% margin vs MNTN's 7.8%
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +7.7% vs MNTN's -65.2%
MNTN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 167.4% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.2x vs 9.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs MNTN's 7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs MNTN's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs MNTN's -65.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs DIS's 5.6%, ROIC 29.8% vs 6.9% |
CHA vs NFLX vs DIS vs MNTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CHA vs NFLX vs DIS vs MNTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CHA leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • MNTN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 325.0x MNTN's $299M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNTN's 7.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $45.2B | $97.3B | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $30.1B | $20.5B | $52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $11.0B | $11.2B | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $9.5B | $7.1B | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +80.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.8% | +31.1% | -29.8% | +137.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CHA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 84% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHA's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNTN's 15.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $374.0B | $192.6B | $724M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $706M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $514M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.46x | 34.89x | 15.87x | -105.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.20x | 24.80x | 16.53x | 9.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.63x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 15.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.98x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 15.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.47x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 12.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CHA and NFLX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for MNTN. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs MNTN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.8% | +41.3% | +9.8% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.1% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% | +6.9% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +99.8% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +12.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.54x | 0.39x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.2B | $5.4B | $39.2B | -$210M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.8B | $9.0B | $5.7B | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $548M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 9.95x | 14.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,483 for MNTN. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs MNTN's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs MNTN's -29.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.7% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -24.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.0% | -23.6% | +7.7% | -65.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | +166.5% | +8.0% | -65.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -65.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | +875.3% | +11.8% | -65.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.5% | +38.6% | +2.6% | -29.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTN's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs MNTN's 28.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.42 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $32.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.98 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $7.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.0% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +28.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 488K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 644K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHA as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 144.3% upside for MNTN (target: $22) vs 27.4% for CHA (target: $14). DIS is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $116.29 | $139.50 | $22.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 99 | 63 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CHA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CHA vs NFLX vs DIS vs MNTN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN?
On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.
5x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares is actually cheaper at 1. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -65. 2% for MNTN Inc. (MNTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus MNTN's -65. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus MNTN Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning MNTN is approximately 268% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.
4% versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTN leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -2. 2% for MNTN Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 8. 3% for MNTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTN leads at 76. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) trades at 1.
2x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 23. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNTN: 144. 3% to $22. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CHA, NFLX, MNTN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHA or NFLX or DIS or MNTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, MNTN: -65. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHA and NFLX and DIS and MNTN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHA (Consumer Defensive) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and MNTN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MNTN is a small-cap high-growth stock. DIS pays a dividend while CHA, NFLX, MNTN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.