Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CHCI vs CLPR vs NXRT vs UMH vs SQFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Diversified
CHCI vs CLPR vs NXRT vs UMH vs SQFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $180M | $50M | $760M | $1.35B | $45M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $153M | $252M | $201M | $18M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-20M | $-32M | $22M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 80.2% | 91.1% | 37.2% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 2.7% | 11.5% | 18.0% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | — | — | 114.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $761M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $31M | $14M | $72M | $8M |
CHCI vs CLPR vs NXRT vs UMH vs SQFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Holding Co… (CHCI) | 100 | 693.3 | +593.3% |
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 54.6 | -45.4% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) | 100 | 116.1 | +16.1% |
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 9.2 | -90.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHCI vs CLPR vs NXRT vs UMH vs SQFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 83.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 212.1%
- 14.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2%
- Better valuation composite
CLPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 14.2% yield, vs NXRT's 7.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 7.0%
UMH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 12.28x
- Beta 0.35, yield 5.3%, current ratio 12.28x
- Beta 0.35 vs CLPR's 0.92
Among these 5 stocks, SQFT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.9% margin vs SQFT's -38.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs CLPR's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield, vs NXRT's 7.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.2% vs SQFT's -41.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs SQFT's -5.3%, ROIC 27.8% vs -0.2% |
CHCI vs CLPR vs NXRT vs UMH vs SQFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CHCI vs CLPR vs NXRT vs UMH vs SQFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHCI leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLPR leads 1 • UMH leads 1 • NXRT leads 0 • SQFT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CHCI and NXRT and UMH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $252M annually — 14.4x SQFT's $18M. CHCI is the more profitable business, keeping 24.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SQFT's -38.7%. On growth, CHCI holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $153M | $252M | $201M | $18M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $36M | $125M | $86M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$20M | -$32M | $22M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $7M | $79M | $87M | -$67,454 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +80.2% | +91.1% | +37.2% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +2.7% | +11.5% | +18.0% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | -13.0% | -12.7% | +10.8% | -38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +4.5% | +31.2% | +43.2% | -0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -2.6% | +0.5% | -100.0% | -11.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.3% | -5.3% | 0.0% | — | -188.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, CHCI trades at a 95% valuation discount to UMH's 226.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQFT's 27.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $180M | $50M | $760M | $1.3B | $45M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $158M | $19M | $2.3B | $2.0B | $139M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.39x | -6.53x | -23.77x | 226.00x | -1.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 114.64x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.91x | 0.53x | 18.63x | 18.17x | 26.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.52x | 0.32x | 3.02x | 5.15x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.44x | — | 2.53x | 1.49x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.56x | 2.20x | 9.09x | 16.45x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCI delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SQFT. CHCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UMH scores 6/9 vs SQFT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.7% | — | -10.1% | +2.4% | -23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.6% | -1.6% | -1.7% | +1.7% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.8% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +2.3% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.9% | +0.3% | +1.5% | +2.8% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | — | 5.18x | 0.84x | 2.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$31M | $1.5B | $689M | $94M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $31M | $14M | $72M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $0 | $1.6B | $761M | $102M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.47x | 1.89x | -0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHCI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHCI five years ago would be worth $34,055 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,893 for SQFT. Over the past 12 months, CHCI leads with a +45.2% total return vs SQFT's -41.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHCI at 59.2% vs SQFT's -21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.9% | -11.1% | +3.1% | +0.9% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.2% | -15.2% | -13.8% | -2.8% | -41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +303.5% | -23.9% | -15.2% | +18.6% | -51.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.5% | -41.4% | -23.0% | -9.6% | -71.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +881.5% | -51.3% | +212.1% | +138.5% | -74.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.2% | -8.7% | -5.3% | +5.9% | -21.3% |
Risk & Volatility
UMH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UMH is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UMH currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs SQFT's 15.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.92x | 0.61x | 0.35x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.72 | $4.61 | $38.30 | $17.47 | $23.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.00 | $2.83 | $23.79 | $13.93 | $2.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +66.6% | +78.2% | +90.6% | +15.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 42.8 | 70.4 | 61.9 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 70K | 213K | 626K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPR and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", UMH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.3% upside for UMH (target: $17) vs -9.8% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, CLPR offers the higher dividend yield at 14.16% vs SQFT's 5.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $27.00 | $16.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 10 | 15 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.2% | +7.0% | +5.3% | +5.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.43 | $2.11 | $0.83 | $0.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.4% | +0.3% |
CHCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CHCI vs CLPR vs NXRT vs UMH vs SQFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT?
On trailing P/E, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus UMH Properties, Inc. at 226. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT?
Over the past 5 years, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) delivered a total return of +240. 5%, compared to -71. 1% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHCI returned +881. 5% versus SQFT's -74. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UMH Properties, Inc.
(UMH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning CLPR is approximately 163% more volatile than UMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UMH Properties, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHCI leads at 18. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT?
Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -135. 4% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHCI leads at 20. 1% versus -2. 0% for SQFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UMH: 4.
3% to $16. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT?
In this comparison, CLPR (14.
2% yield), NXRT (7. 0% yield), UMH (5. 3% yield), SQFT (5. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CHCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHCI or CLPR or NXRT or UMH or SQFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UMH Properties, Inc.
(UMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 5. 3% yield, +138. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UMH: +138. 5%, CLPR: -51. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHCI and CLPR and NXRT and UMH and SQFT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHCI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UMH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SQFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CLPR, NXRT, UMH, SQFT pay a dividend while CHCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.