Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CHCI vs SQFT vs NXRT vs CLPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
CHCI vs SQFT vs NXRT vs CLPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $179M | $44M | $756M | $50M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $18M | $252M | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-7M | $-32M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 64.6% | 91.1% | 80.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 16.6% | 11.5% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $102M | $1.56B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $8M | $14M | $31M |
CHCI vs SQFT vs NXRT vs CLPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Holding Co… (CHCI) | 100 | 693.3 | +593.3% |
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 9.2 | -90.8% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 54.6 | -45.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHCI vs SQFT vs NXRT vs CLPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 83.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 12.0%, current ratio 5.52x
- 14.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2%
SQFT is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.87, yield 5.1%, current ratio 6.07x
NXRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CLPR's 13.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CLPR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.9% margin vs SQFT's -38.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs CLPR's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CLPR's 13.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.4% vs SQFT's -40.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs SQFT's -5.3%, ROIC 27.8% vs -0.2% |
CHCI vs SQFT vs NXRT vs CLPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CHCI vs SQFT vs NXRT vs CLPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHCI leads in 2 of 6 categories
NXRT leads 1 • CLPR leads 1 • SQFT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $252M annually — 14.4x SQFT's $18M. CHCI is the more profitable business, keeping 24.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SQFT's -38.7%. On growth, CHCI holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $18M | $252M | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $8M | $125M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$7M | -$32M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$67,454 | $79M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +64.6% | +91.1% | +80.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +16.6% | +11.5% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | -38.7% | -12.7% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -0.4% | +31.2% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -11.2% | +0.5% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.3% | -188.7% | 0.0% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQFT's 26.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $179M | $44M | $756M | $50M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $157M | $138M | $2.3B | $20M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.32x | -1.56x | -23.65x | -6.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.27x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.82x | 26.78x | 18.60x | 0.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.50x | 2.30x | 3.01x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.43x | 1.25x | 2.52x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.47x | — | 9.05x | 2.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCI delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SQFT. CHCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHCI scores 5/9 vs CLPR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.7% | -23.1% | -10.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.6% | -5.3% | -1.7% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.8% | -0.2% | +1.1% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.9% | -0.2% | +1.5% | +0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 2.92x | 5.18x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $94M | $1.5B | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $8M | $14M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $102M | $1.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.06x | 0.47x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHCI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHCI five years ago would be worth $33,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,870 for SQFT. Over the past 12 months, CHCI leads with a +52.4% total return vs SQFT's -40.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHCI at 58.9% vs SQFT's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.1% | -1.1% | +2.6% | -9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.4% | -40.7% | -15.2% | -14.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.2% | -52.2% | -15.5% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.9% | -71.3% | -23.0% | -42.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +875.8% | -74.3% | +211.1% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.9% | -21.8% | -5.5% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHCI and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHCI currently trades 88.1% from its 52-week high vs SQFT's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.79x | 0.61x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.72 | $23.00 | $38.30 | $4.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.00 | $2.10 | $23.79 | $2.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +15.3% | +77.8% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 53.6 | 71.0 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 1.0M | 216K | 70K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and CLPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.93% vs SQFT's 5.13%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $27.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.1% | +7.1% | +13.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.18 | $2.11 | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
CHCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NXRT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CHCI vs SQFT vs NXRT vs CLPR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHCI or SQFT or NXRT or CLPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CHCI or SQFT or NXRT or CLPR?
Over the past 5 years, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) delivered a total return of +239. 9%, compared to -71. 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHCI returned +881. 5% versus SQFT's -74. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CHCI or SQFT or NXRT or CLPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning CLPR is approximately 50% more volatile than NXRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CHCI or SQFT or NXRT or CLPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. grew EPS 83. 1% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHCI leads at 18. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CHCI or SQFT or NXRT or CLPR?
Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -135. 4% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHCI leads at 20. 1% versus -2. 0% for SQFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CHCI or SQFT or NXRT or CLPR?
In this comparison, CLPR (13.
9% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), SQFT (5. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CHCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CHCI or SQFT or NXRT or CLPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 7. 1% yield, +212. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +212. 1%, CLPR: -51. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CHCI and SQFT and NXRT and CLPR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHCI is a small-cap deep-value stock; SQFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SQFT, NXRT, CLPR pay a dividend while CHCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.