CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$33.64B
5Y Perf.+17.1%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHT vs TLK vs SKM vs PHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TLK
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$16.84B
5Y Perf.-20.4%
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$13.93B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
PHI
PLDT Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.-16.7%
CHT vs TLK vs SKM vs PHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHT | TLK | SKM | PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $33.64B | $16.84B | $13.93B | $4.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $235.08B | $147.37T | $17.10T | $218.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38.69B | $21.72T | $407.83B | $30.02B |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 66.7% | 88.0% | 71.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 27.0% | 11.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.1x |
| Total Debt | $38.02B | $76.83T | $10.77T | $359.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37.09B | $33.91T | $1.49T | $11.86B |
CHT vs TLK vs SKM vs PHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHT
TLK
SKM
PHI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chunghwa Telecom Co… (CHT) | 100 | 117.1 | +17.1% |
| Perusahaan Perseroa… (TLK) | 100 | 79.6 | -20.4% |
| SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM) | 100 | 190.2 | +90.2% |
| PLDT Inc. (PHI) | 100 | 83.3 | -16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHT vs TLK vs SKM vs PHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHT and TLK are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. SKM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick
CHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 9.5%, current ratio 1.48x
- Beta 0.19, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.48x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TLK
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
The Value Play
TLK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x)
- 6.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PHI's 7.9%
- 7.3% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs 3.8%
Best for: value and dividends
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Long-Run Compounder
SKM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 239.9% 10Y total return vs CHT's 63.1%
- PEG 0.00 vs CHT's 0.27
- +77.0% vs PHI's -7.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
PHI
PLDT Inc.
The Income Angle
PHI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CHT | 3.3% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4% |
| Value | TLK | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | CHT | 16.5% margin vs SKM's 2.4% |
| Stability / Safety | CHT | Beta 0.19 vs TLK's 0.77, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TLK | 6.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PHI's 7.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SKM | +77.0% vs PHI's -7.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TLK | 7.3% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs 3.8% |
CHT vs TLK vs SKM vs PHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
CHT vs TLK vs SKM vs PHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHTLAGGINGPHI
Who Leads Where
CHT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SKM leads 1 • TLK leads 0 • PHI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓PHIPLDT Inc.
0leads
TLKPerusahaan Perseroan …
0leads
SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd
1leads
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co.,…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SKMvs TLKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHT5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SKM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CHT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CHT and PHI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.37T annually — 674.5x PHI's $218.5B. CHT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 2.4%. On growth, CHT holds the edge at +1.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | TLKPerusahaan Perser… | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $235.1B | $147.37T | $17.10T | $218.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87.5B | $73.14T | $5.58T | $108.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38.7B | $21.72T | $407.8B | $30.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51.3B | $40.12T | $1.33T | $35.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +66.7% | +88.0% | +71.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +27.0% | +11.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +14.7% | +2.4% | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +27.2% | +7.8% | +16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.4% | -0.9% | -4.1% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -18.7% | -60.7% | +17.3% |
Evenly matched — CHT and PHI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TLK and SKM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, PHI trades at a 83% valuation discount to SKM's 51.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SKM offers better value at 0.00x vs CHT's 9.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | TLKPerusahaan Perser… | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.6B | $16.8B | $13.9B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.7B | $19.3B | $20.3B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.22x | 12.41x | 51.50x | 8.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.82x | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.01x | — | 0.00x | 1.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.55x | 4.45x | 6.41x | 5.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.46x | 1.96x | 1.17x | 1.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.63x | 1.81x | 1.61x | 2.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.24x | 9.19x | 11.75x | 11.19x |
Evenly matched — TLK and SKM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHI delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for SKM. CHT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PHI's 2.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHT scores 9/9 vs TLK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | TLKPerusahaan Perser… | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +13.7% | +3.4% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +7.3% | +1.4% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +16.1% | +3.8% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +19.6% | +4.8% | +12.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.47x | 0.86x | 2.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $929M | $42.93T | $9.28T | $347.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37.1B | $33.91T | $1.49T | $11.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38.0B | $76.83T | $10.77T | $359.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 130.38x | 8.52x | 2.80x | — |
CHT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKM five years ago would be worth $19,652 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,846 for TLK. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +77.0% total return vs PHI's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKM at 24.3% vs TLK's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | TLKPerusahaan Perser… | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -19.4% | +76.6% | -3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.8% | +16.6% | +77.0% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.0% | -26.2% | +92.2% | +16.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -1.5% | +96.5% | +11.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.1% | -4.4% | +239.9% | +7.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.5% | -9.6% | +24.3% | +5.2% |
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TLK's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHT currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs TLK's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | TLKPerusahaan Perser… | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.77x | 0.34x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.03 | $23.52 | $40.46 | $24.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.28 | $15.56 | $19.66 | $18.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +72.3% | +89.7% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 39.7 | 57.1 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 808K | 1.7M | 137K |
CHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CHT and TLK and PHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHT as "Sell", TLK as "Hold", SKM as "Hold", PHI as "Hold". For income investors, PHI offers the higher dividend yield at 7.87% vs SKM's 3.15%.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | TLKPerusahaan Perser… | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 2 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +6.0% | +3.2% | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $50.30 | $17850.40 | $1661.27 | $97.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — CHT and TLK and PHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CHT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). SKM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHT vs TLK vs SKM vs PHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI?
On trailing P/E, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd wins at 0. 00x versus Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. 's 0. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI?
Over the past 5 years, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) delivered a total return of +96. 5%, compared to -1. 5% for Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +239. 9% versus TLK's -4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk's 0. 77β — meaning TLK is approximately 299% more volatile than CHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 4. 2% year-over-year, compared to -68. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHT leads at 3. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI?
Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 2. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TLK leads at 28. 7% versus 6. 3% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLK leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. 's 0. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 8x for Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 3. 2% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM).
09Is CHT or TLK or SKM or PHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHT: +63. 1%, TLK: -4. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHT and TLK and SKM and PHI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TLK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SKM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PHI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 52%
- Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Revenue Growth>
%
(CHT: 1.4% · TLK: -0.9%)Net Margin>
%
(CHT: 16.5% · TLK: 14.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CHT: 27.2x · TLK: 12.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.