Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIGI vs CWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
CIGI vs CWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $4.83B | $3.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.66B | $10.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $105M | $88M |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | 17.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.70B | $3.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $256M | $784M |
CIGI vs CWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colliers Internatio… (CIGI) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Cushman & Wakefield… (CWK) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIGI vs CWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth -36.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
- 149.6% 10Y total return vs CWK's -18.4%
CWK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 12.8x)
- +45.2% vs CIGI's -20.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs CWK's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 12.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs CWK's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs CWK's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.2% vs CIGI's -20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs CWK's 1.2%, ROIC 6.4% vs 7.9% |
CIGI vs CWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CIGI vs CWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIGI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 1.8x CIGI's $5.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.9% (CIGI) to 0.9% (CWK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $10.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $669M | $556M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $105M | $88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $239M | $307M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +17.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | +10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.2% | -120.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CWK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.2x trailing earnings, CWK trades at a 19% valuation discount to CIGI's 47.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWK's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CIGI's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.09x | 38.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.82x | 10.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.87x | 10.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.78x | 11.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIGI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWK delivers a 4.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for CIGI. CIGI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWK's 1.66x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $256M | $784M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.70x | 1.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIGI five years ago would be worth $8,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,289 for CWK. Over the past 12 months, CWK leads with a +45.2% total return vs CIGI's -20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWK at 22.1% vs CIGI's 2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.2% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.3% | +45.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.8% | +82.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.5% | -17.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.6% | -18.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.5% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIGI and CWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIGI is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CWK's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWK currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs CIGI's 56.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $171.51 | $17.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $94.57 | $9.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.6% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.5 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 273K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CIGI as "Buy" and CWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 87.6% upside for CIGI (target: $182) vs 29.4% for CWK (target: $19). CIGI is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $182.00 | $18.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
CIGI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CWK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CIGI vs CWK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIGI or CWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK). Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) offers the better valuation at 38. 2x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIGI or CWK?
On trailing P/E, Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) is the cheapest at 38.
2x versus Colliers International Group Inc. at 47. 1x. On forward P/E, Cushman & Wakefield plc is actually cheaper at 10. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIGI or CWK?
Over the past 5 years, Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) delivered a total return of -15. 5%, compared to -17. 1% for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIGI returned +149. 6% versus CWK's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIGI or CWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Cushman & Wakefield plc's 1. 90β — meaning CWK is approximately 51% more volatile than CIGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 166% for Cushman & Wakefield plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIGI or CWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus 8. 9% for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cushman & Wakefield plc grew EPS -32. 1% year-over-year, compared to -36. 0% for Colliers International Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIGI leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIGI or CWK?
Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus 0. 9% for Cushman & Wakefield plc — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIGI leads at 7. 2% versus 4. 5% for CWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIGI leads at 30. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIGI or CWK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) trades at 10.
1x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Colliers International Group Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CIGI: 87. 6% to $182. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIGI or CWK?
In this comparison, CIGI (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. CWK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CIGI or CWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +149. 6% 10Y return). Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIGI: +149. 6%, CWK: -18. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIGI and CWK?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIGI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.