Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIGI vs MMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
CIGI vs MMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $4.83B | $1.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.66B | $755M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $105M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 58.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.70B | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $256M | $162M |
CIGI vs MMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colliers Internatio… (CIGI) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Marcus & Millichap,… (MMI) | 100 | 104.0 | +4.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIGI vs MMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth -36.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
- 149.6% 10Y total return vs MMI's 29.8%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs MMI's 8.5%
MMI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 13.0%, current ratio 2.55x
- Beta 1.03, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs MMI's 8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 58.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs MMI's -0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs CIGI's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CIGI's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.9% vs CIGI's -20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs MMI's -0.2%, ROIC 6.4% vs -1.9% |
CIGI vs MMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIGI vs MMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CIGI and MMI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIGI is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 7.5x MMI's $755M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.9% (CIGI) to -0.3% (MMI). On growth, CIGI holds the edge at +13.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $755M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $669M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $105M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $239M | $59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | -0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.2% | +54.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CIGI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.09x | -585.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.82x | 58.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.87x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.78x | 18.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIGI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIGI delivers a 4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-0 for MMI. MMI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIGI's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIGI scores 6/9 vs MMI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | -0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | -1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | -$84M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $256M | $162M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.70x | 4.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CIGI and MMI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMI five years ago would be worth $8,879 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,452 for CIGI. Over the past 12 months, MMI leads with a -3.9% total return vs CIGI's -20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIGI at 2.5% vs MMI's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.2% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.3% | -3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.8% | -3.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.5% | -11.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.6% | +29.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.5% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MMI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMI is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIGI's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MMI currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs CIGI's 56.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $171.51 | $33.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $94.57 | $24.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.6% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.5 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 273K | 230K |
Analyst Outlook
MMI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CIGI as "Buy" and MMI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 87.6% upside for CIGI (target: $182) vs -9.3% for MMI (target: $26). For income investors, MMI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.84% vs CIGI's 0.43%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $182.00 | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $0.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
CIGI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MMI leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
CIGI vs MMI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIGI or MMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 5% for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI). Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI) offers the better valuation at 47. 1x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIGI or MMI?
On forward P/E, Colliers International Group Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIGI or MMI?
Over the past 5 years, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
(MMI) delivered a total return of -11. 2%, compared to -15. 5% for Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIGI returned +149. 6% versus MMI's +29. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIGI or MMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
(MMI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Colliers International Group Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning CIGI is approximately 23% more volatile than MMI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 96% for Colliers International Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIGI or MMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus 8. 5% for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marcus & Millichap, Inc. grew EPS 84. 7% year-over-year, compared to -36. 0% for Colliers International Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIGI leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIGI or MMI?
Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus -0. 3% for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIGI leads at 7. 2% versus -1. 8% for MMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMI leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIGI or MMI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Colliers International Group Inc.
(CIGI) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 58. 5x for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. — 45. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CIGI: 87. 6% to $182. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIGI or MMI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI).
09Is CIGI or MMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
(MMI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMI: +29. 8%, CIGI: +149. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIGI and MMI?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIGI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MMI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MMI pays a dividend while CIGI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.