CINT vs EXLS vs EPAM vs CTSH vs ACN

For growth investors, CI&T Inc (CINT) is the stronger pick with 510.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CI&T Inc (CINT) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the cheapest at 11.

4x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, CI&T Inc is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CI&T Inc wins at 0. 17x versus Accenture plc's 1. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -78. 0% for CI&T Inc (CINT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +221. 4% versus CINT's -78. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EPAM is approximately 82% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 44% for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CI&T Inc (CINT) is pulling ahead at 510.

9% versus 7. 0% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CI&T Inc grew EPS 39. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 3% for EPAM Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CINT leads at 84. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 6. 9% for EPAM Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTSH leads at 16. 7% versus 9. 6% for EPAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, CI&T Inc (CINT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Accenture plc's 1. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CI&T Inc (CINT) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPAM: 88. 7% to $197. 00.

In this comparison, ACN (3.

2% yield), CTSH (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. CINT, EXLS, EPAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

75), 2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTSH: +0. 0%, EPAM: +48. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CINT is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EPAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CTSH is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CTSH, ACN pay a dividend while CINT, EXLS, EPAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.