REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CIO vs JBGS vs PDM vs HIW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
CIO vs JBGS vs PDM vs HIW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $282M | $912M | $1.06B | $2.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $164M | $506M | $422M | $820M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $-112M | $-86M | $93M |
| Gross Margin | 60.5% | -10.2% | 19.1% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | -53.1% | -0.5% | 13.9% | 25.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 39.6x |
| Total Debt | $647M | $2.54B | $2.27B | $3.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $75M | $731K | $27M |
CIO vs JBGS vs PDM vs HIW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| City Office REIT, I… (CIO) | 100 | 75.3 | -24.7% |
| JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) | 100 | 57.2 | -42.8% |
| Piedmont Office Rea… (PDM) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIO vs JBGS vs PDM vs HIW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 8.4%
- 18.0% 10Y total return vs HIW's -6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 88.1%, current ratio 0.32x
- Beta 0.11, yield 8.4%, current ratio 0.32x
JBGS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PDM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.9%, EPS growth -4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- -0.9% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9%
HIW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 11.4% margin vs CIO's -75.3%
- 1.5% ROA vs CIO's -11.6%, ROIC 2.7% vs 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.9% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.4% margin vs CIO's -75.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs PDM's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.4% yield, vs JBGS's 4.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs HIW's -5.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs CIO's -11.6%, ROIC 2.7% vs 1.0% |
CIO vs JBGS vs PDM vs HIW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CIO vs JBGS vs PDM vs HIW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CIO leads in 3 of 6 categories
HIW leads 2 • JBGS leads 0 • PDM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIW is the larger business by revenue, generating $820M annually — 5.0x CIO's $164M. HIW is the more profitable business, keeping 11.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIO's -75.3%. On growth, HIW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $164M | $506M | $422M | $820M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $129M | $229M | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | -$112M | -$86M | $93M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $93M | $47M | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.5% | -10.2% | +19.1% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -53.1% | -0.5% | +13.9% | +25.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -75.3% | -22.2% | -20.5% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +18.3% | +11.2% | +38.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.0% | +5.7% | -100.0% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | +42.9% | -23.0% | -67.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CIO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PDM's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JBGS's 18.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $282M | $912M | $1.1B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $910M | $3.4B | $3.3B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.10x | -7.40x | -12.67x | 17.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 39.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.67x | 18.41x | 10.88x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 1.83x | 1.88x | 3.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 0.62x | 0.71x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.79x | — | — | 16.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-20 for CIO. CIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBGS's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIW scores 6/9 vs CIO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.2% | -6.5% | -5.7% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.6% | -2.5% | -2.2% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | -0.1% | +1.5% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | -0.1% | +2.0% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 1.52x | 1.52x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $628M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $75M | $731,000 | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $647M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | -0.13x | 0.35x | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIO five years ago would be worth $8,288 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,067 for JBGS. Over the past 12 months, CIO leads with a +45.6% total return vs HIW's -5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIO at 17.6% vs JBGS's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.1% | -7.4% | +2.4% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | +5.4% | +26.5% | -5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +23.2% | +47.5% | +44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.1% | -39.3% | -39.2% | -20.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.0% | -28.5% | -23.4% | -6.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +7.2% | +13.8% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CIO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PDM's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIO currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs JBGS's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.63x | 1.08x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.01 | $24.30 | $9.19 | $32.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.62 | $14.03 | $6.32 | $20.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +63.6% | +92.4% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 58.6 | 67.0 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 599K | 1.1M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIO and JBGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CIO as "Hold", JBGS as "Hold", PDM as "Hold", HIW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 114.6% upside for CIO (target: $15) vs 5.6% for HIW (target: $27). For income investors, CIO offers the higher dividend yield at 8.36% vs PDM's 2.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $18.00 | $10.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 6 | 11 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.4% | +4.7% | +2.9% | +7.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | $0.72 | $0.25 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +48.6% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
CIO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HIW leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CIO vs JBGS vs PDM vs HIW: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
(PDM) is the stronger pick with -0. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (39. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate City Office REIT, Inc. (CIO) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW?
Over the past 5 years, City Office REIT, Inc.
(CIO) delivered a total return of -17. 1%, compared to -39. 3% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIO returned +18. 0% versus JBGS's -28. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), City Office REIT, Inc.
(CIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning PDM is approximately 879% more volatile than CIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, City Office REIT, Inc. (CIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 152% for JBG SMITH Properties — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
(PDM) is pulling ahead at -0. 9% versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highwoods Properties, Inc. grew EPS 54. 3% year-over-year, compared to -152. 0% for City Office REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIO leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW?
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus -27. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIW leads at 26. 0% versus -1. 3% for JBGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIW leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CIO: 114.
6% to $15. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
City Office REIT, Inc. (CIO) offers the highest yield at 8. 4%, versus 2. 9% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM).
08Is CIO or JBGS or PDM or HIW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, City Office REIT, Inc.
(CIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 8. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIO: +18. 0%, PDM: -23. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CIO and JBGS and PDM and HIW?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JBGS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.