Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CISS vs TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CISS
C3is Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$586K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-68.1%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+51.6%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.+244.6%

CISS vs TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CISS logoCISS
TOPS logoTOPS
SBLK logoSBLK
SHIP logoSHIP
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$586K$10M$3.09B$342M
Revenue (TTM)$35M$123M$1.04B$153M
Net Income (TTM)$10M$1M$84M$15M
Gross Margin12.8%59.5%33.0%45.4%
Operating Margin3.9%36.5%13.6%23.4%
Forward P/E0.8x2.0x7.2x6.0x
Total Debt$25K$251M$1.07B$290M
Cash & Equiv.$617K$8M$500M$63M

CISS vs TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CISS
TOPS
SBLK
SHIP
StockJun 23May 26Return
C3is Inc. (CISS)1000.0-100.0%
Top Ships Inc. (TOPS)10031.9-68.1%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100151.6+51.6%
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)100344.6+244.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CISS vs TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CISS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Top Ships Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. SHIP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CISS
C3is Inc.
The Income Pick

CISS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.02, yield 49.0%
  • Beta -0.02, yield 49.0%, current ratio 6.21x
  • Lower P/E (0.8x vs 6.0x)
  • 30.1% margin vs TOPS's 1.2%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.
The Growth Play

TOPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
  • 3.8% revenue growth vs CISS's -17.8%
  • Beta 0.54 vs SHIP's 1.21
Best for: growth exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs SHIP's -99.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Momentum Pick

SHIP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +207.0% vs CISS's -99.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTOPS logoTOPS3.8% revenue growth vs CISS's -17.8%
ValueCISS logoCISSLower P/E (0.8x vs 6.0x)
Quality / MarginsCISS logoCISS30.1% margin vs TOPS's 1.2%
Stability / SafetyTOPS logoTOPSBeta 0.54 vs SHIP's 1.21
DividendsCISS logoCISS49.0% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs CISS's -99.4%
Efficiency (ROA)CISS logoCISS11.0% ROA vs TOPS's 0.3%, ROIC 1.3% vs 5.3%

CISS vs TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CISSC3is Inc.
FY 2025
Voyage Charter Revenues
65.6%$23M
Time Charter Revenues
31.8%$11M
Other Operating Income
2.6%$902,902
TOPSTop Ships Inc.
FY 2021
Time Charter Contracts
100.0%$56M
Time Charter - Related Parties
0.0%$0
Voyage Charter
0.0%$0
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M

CISS vs TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCISSLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 30.0x CISS's $35M. CISS is the more profitable business, keeping 30.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOPS's 1.2%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCISS logoCISSC3is Inc.TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$123M$1.0B$153M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9M$66M$311M$68M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$10M$1M$84M$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M-$63M$209M-$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+12.8%+59.5%+33.0%+45.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.9%+36.5%+13.6%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+30.1%+1.2%+8.1%+9.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.0%-50.9%+20.0%-4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+100.0%-2.7%+18.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+43.7%-3.2%+58.3%+84.4%
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CISS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 0.8x trailing earnings, CISS trades at a 98% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TOPS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.

MetricCISS logoCISSC3is Inc.TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Market CapShares × price$585,744$10M$3.1B$342M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$6,145$254M$3.7B$570M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.83x2.02x36.73x16.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.17x6.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-0.00x4.97x11.87x7.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x0.12x2.97x2.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x0.07x1.26x1.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.15x0.59x14.73x20.11x
CISS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CISS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CISS delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for TOPS. CISS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CISS scores 5/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCISS logoCISSC3is Inc.TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.8%+0.8%+3.4%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.0%+0.3%+2.2%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.3%+5.3%+3.2%+6.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.5%+6.9%+4.0%+7.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95453
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x1.74x0.44x1.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$591,889$244M$572M$228M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$616,640$8M$500M$63M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24,751$251M$1.1B$290M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.63x1.91x2.08x1.68x
CISS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SBLK five years ago would be worth $17,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for CISS. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs CISS's -99.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs CISS's -98.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCISS logoCISSC3is Inc.TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-89.4%-53.6%+40.3%+79.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.4%-61.1%+83.1%+207.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-75.2%+60.6%+282.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-99.4%+79.1%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-100.0%+977.3%-99.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-98.6%-37.2%+17.1%+56.3%
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CISS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CISS is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CISS's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCISS logoCISSC3is Inc.TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.01x0.51x0.74x1.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$831.60$11.47$27.20$16.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.08$2.11$14.79$5.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.4%+19.2%+98.6%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10030.924.772.862.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded109K210K1.4M258K
Evenly matched — CISS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CISS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs 4.9% for SHIP (target: $17). For income investors, CISS offers the higher dividend yield at 49.02% vs SBLK's 1.11%.

MetricCISS logoCISSC3is Inc.TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$17.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts243
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+49.0%+1.1%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.63$0.30$0.46
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+100.0%+3.2%0.0%
CISS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CISS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TOPS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallC3is Inc. (CISS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CISS vs TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 8% for C3is Inc. (CISS). C3is Inc. (CISS) offers the better valuation at 0. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP?

On trailing P/E, C3is Inc.

(CISS) is the cheapest at 0. 8x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP?

Over the past 5 years, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) delivered a total return of +79. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for C3is Inc. (CISS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 9% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C3is Inc.

(CISS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 17β — meaning SHIP is approximately -7920% more volatile than CISS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, C3is Inc. (CISS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -17. 8% for C3is Inc. (CISS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C3is Inc. grew EPS 115. 5% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CISS leads at 119. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP?

C3is Inc.

(CISS) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus 5. 8% for Top Ships Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus 3. 9% for CISS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOPS leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 7. 2x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP?

In this comparison, CISS (49.

0% yield), SHIP (2. 9% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TOPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CISS or TOPS or SBLK or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 1% yield, +977. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 9%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CISS and TOPS and SBLK and SHIP?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CISS is a small-cap deep-value stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock. CISS, SBLK, SHIP pay a dividend while TOPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CISS

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TOPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CISS and TOPS and SBLK and SHIP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CISS: 12.1% · TOPS: 100.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CISS: 0.8x · TOPS: 2.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.