Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $518M | $522M | $2.38B | $4.14B | $2.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $255M | $314M | $867M | $1.89B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $26M | $169M | $392M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 50.9% | 72.1% | 67.4% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.7% | 10.9% | 25.3% | 25.7% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 13.3x | 10.9x | 10.6x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $284M | $517M | $327M | $1.30B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $231M | $185M | $271M | $668M |
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civista Bancshares,… (CIVB) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.8 | +91.8% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.0 | +88.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIVB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 52.3%, current ratio 4.32x
- Beta 0.86, yield 2.7%, current ratio 4.32x
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 11.5x)
- Beta 0.86 vs FULT's 1.12
HONE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 78.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.1%
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs NBTB's 1.55
- 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.1%
TRMK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 127.0% 10Y total return vs CIVB's 163.5%
- NIM 3.4% vs HONE's 2.2%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
- +29.7% vs HONE's +6.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs FULT's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.7% vs HONE's +6.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FULT leads in 1 of 6 categories
CIVB leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • HONE leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 7.4x CIVB's $255M. FULT is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HONE's 8.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $255M | $314M | $867M | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $37M | $241M | $529M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $26M | $169M | $392M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $46M | $225M | $267M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.4% | +50.9% | +72.1% | +67.4% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +10.9% | +25.3% | +25.7% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +8.7% | +19.5% | +20.7% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +0.8% | +25.2% | +15.0% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | +11.1% | +39.5% | +47.2% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, CIVB trades at a 48% valuation discount to HONE's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs NBTB's 1.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $518M | $522M | $2.4B | $4.1B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $725M | $808M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.47x | 18.33x | 13.69x | 10.34x | 12.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.85x | 13.30x | 10.94x | 10.57x | 11.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.66x | 1.23x | 1.95x | 0.74x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.12x | 20.84x | 10.46x | 9.76x | 9.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 1.66x | 2.74x | 2.19x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 0.87x | 1.22x | 1.13x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.73x | 200.70x | 10.87x | 14.55x | 11.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for HONE. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HONE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +4.6% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +2.3% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +3.5% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.90x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $207M | $285M | $142M | $1.0B | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $231M | $185M | $271M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $284M | $517M | $327M | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.24x | 1.05x | 0.84x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CIVB and FULT and TRMK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,770 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,586 for HONE. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +29.7% total return vs HONE's +6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 32.2% vs NBTB's 15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | — | +10.5% | +11.4% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.9% | +6.5% | +8.6% | +27.0% | +29.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.0% | +58.9% | +55.7% | +130.9% | +117.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.1% | -4.1% | +33.5% | +42.6% | +47.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.5% | +88.3% | +104.0% | +106.5% | +127.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.4% | +16.7% | +15.9% | +32.2% | +29.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIVB and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIVB is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs HONE's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.04x | 0.88x | 1.12x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.31 | $14.29 | $46.92 | $22.99 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.95 | $10.57 | $39.20 | $16.60 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +84.7% | +97.2% | +93.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 32.5 | 56.2 | 50.9 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 0 | 237K | 2.0M | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CIVB as "Buy", HONE as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for HONE (target: $14) vs 0.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs TRMK's 2.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $14.00 | $46.00 | $24.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 6 | 10 | 20 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.6% | +3.1% | +3.6% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 5 | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.32 | $1.43 | $0.77 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +4.1% | +0.4% | +1.6% | +3.0% |
FULT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CIVB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 75x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.
7%, compared to -4. 1% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (HONE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIVB returned +163. 5% versus HONE's +88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 12β — meaning FULT is approximately 30% more volatile than CIVB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 90% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 78. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Trustmark Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
7% net margin versus 8. 7% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 10. 9% for HONE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HONE: 15. 7% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 2. 7% yield, +163. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIVB: +163. 5%, FULT: +106. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIVB and HONE and NBTB and FULT and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIVB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.