CIX
CompX International Inc.
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$293M
5Y Perf.+68.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CIX vs FBIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
CIX vs FBIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CIX | FBIN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Construction |
| Market Cap | $293M | $4.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $159M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 88.0x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $264M |
CIX vs FBIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CIX
FBIN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CompX International… (CIX) | 100 | 168.8 | +68.8% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIX vs FBIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CIX leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CIX
CompX International Inc.
The Income Pick
CIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 9.3%
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
- 223.2% 10Y total return vs FBIN's -2.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Pick
FBIN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.77 vs CIX's 6.40
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 88.0x), PEG 2.77 vs 6.40
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CIX | 8.5% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 88.0x), PEG 2.77 vs 6.40 |
| Quality / Margins | CIX | 12.7% margin vs FBIN's 5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | CIX | Beta 0.50 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | CIX | 9.3% yield, vs FBIN's 2.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CIX | +0.2% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CIX | 12.8% ROA vs FBIN's 3.0%, ROIC 20.0% vs 8.1% |
CIX vs FBIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CIX vs FBIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCIXLAGGINGFBIN
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
CIXCompX International I…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CIX5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN4/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CIX6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CIX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CIX2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 21.2x CIX's $159M. CIX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIN's 5.8%. On growth, CIX holds the edge at +0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $159M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $482M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $420M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | -106.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | -2.0% |
CIX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, CIX trades at a 5% valuation discount to FBIN's 15.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CIX offers better value at 1.09x vs FBIN's 2.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $293M | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $239M | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.03x | 15.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 87.96x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | 2.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 10.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.30x | 12.77x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIX leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for FBIN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 7/9 vs CIX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$54M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $264M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.72x |
CIX leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIX five years ago would be worth $14,600 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, CIX leads with a +0.2% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIX at 16.1% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.2% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | -36.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.0% | -54.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.2% | -2.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | -13.9% |
CIX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIX currently trades 73.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.30 | $64.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $36.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.5% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 2.6M |
CIX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIX and FBIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CIX offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs FBIN's 2.55%.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $59.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.20 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% |
Evenly matched — CIX and FBIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CIX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallCompX International Inc. (CIX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CIX vs FBIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIX or FBIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (88. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIX or FBIN?
On trailing P/E, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. wins at 2. 77x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIX or FBIN?
Over the past 5 years, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) delivered a total return of +46. 0%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIX returned +223. 2% versus FBIN's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIX or FBIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 222% more volatile than CIX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CIX or FBIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CompX International Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -34. 1% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIX leads at -1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIX or FBIN?
CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus 6. 7% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIX leads at 14. 3% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIX or FBIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 77x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for CompX International Inc. — 76. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIX or FBIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 2. 5% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN).
09Is CIX or FBIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 9. 3% yield, +223. 2% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIX: +223. 2%, FBIN: -2. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIX and FBIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CIX: 0.7% · FBIN: -106.4%)Net Margin>
%
(CIX: 12.7% · FBIN: 5.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CIX: 15.0x · FBIN: 15.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.