Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CKX vs JBGS vs DEI vs PINE vs HIW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Retail
REIT - Office
CKX vs JBGS vs DEI vs PINE vs HIW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Retail | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $22M | $912M | $2.02B | $281M | $2.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $897K | $506M | $1.00B | $65M | $820M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $475K | $-112M | $16M | $-415K | $93M |
| Gross Margin | 93.9% | -10.2% | 43.8% | -4.1% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | -0.5% | 19.0% | 28.0% | 25.6% |
| Forward P/E | 89.3x | — | 123.9x | 59.3x | 39.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.54B | $5.57B | $394M | $3.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $75M | $341M | $5M | $27M |
CKX vs JBGS vs DEI vs PINE vs HIW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX) | 100 | 134.3 | +34.3% |
| JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) | 100 | 41.0 | -59.0% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CKX vs JBGS vs DEI vs PINE vs HIW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CKX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 71.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 52.9% margin vs JBGS's -22.2%
- Beta 0.30 vs DEI's 0.92
- 2.5% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 0.7% vs -0.1%
JBGS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.7%
Among these 5 stocks, DEI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 38.3% 10Y total return vs HIW's -6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 0.33x
- 15.9% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9%
- +37.3% vs DEI's -11.7%
HIW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.76, yield 7.7%, current ratio 42.45x
- Lower P/E (39.6x vs 59.3x)
- 7.7% yield, vs DEI's 6.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (39.6x vs 59.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.9% margin vs JBGS's -22.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs DEI's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, vs DEI's 6.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs DEI's -11.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 0.7% vs -0.1% |
CKX vs JBGS vs DEI vs PINE vs HIW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CKX vs JBGS vs DEI vs PINE vs HIW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CKX leads in 1 of 6 categories
DEI leads 1 • HIW leads 1 • PINE leads 1 • JBGS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CKX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DEI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1118.9x CKX's $897,333. CKX is the more profitable business, keeping 52.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBGS's -22.2%. On growth, CKX holds the edge at +35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $897,333 | $506M | $1.0B | $65M | $820M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $313,061 | $129M | $589M | $45M | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $475,078 | -$112M | $16M | -$415,000 | $93M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $433,651 | $93M | $119M | -$46M | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.9% | -10.2% | +43.8% | -4.1% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | -0.5% | +19.0% | +28.0% | +25.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | -22.2% | +1.6% | -0.6% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +18.3% | +11.8% | -71.7% | +38.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | +5.7% | +1.8% | +29.6% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +42.9% | — | +185.7% | -67.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DEI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, HIW trades at a 86% valuation discount to DEI's 123.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DEI's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CKX's 153.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $912M | $2.0B | $281M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $3.4B | $7.2B | $671M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.33x | -7.40x | 123.87x | -89.27x | 17.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 59.32x | 39.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 153.19x | 18.41x | 12.29x | 14.63x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.47x | 1.83x | 2.01x | 4.65x | 3.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 0.62x | 0.58x | 1.01x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 107.49x | — | 10.37x | — | 16.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-6 for JBGS. PINE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DEI's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIW scores 6/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -6.5% | +0.5% | -0.1% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -2.5% | +0.2% | -0.1% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | -0.1% | +1.6% | +2.2% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | -0.1% | +3.0% | +2.8% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.52x | 1.60x | 1.31x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $390M | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $75M | $341M | $5M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.5B | $5.6B | $394M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.13x | 0.96x | 0.82x | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,049 for DEI. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs DEI's -11.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.6% vs CKX's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | -7.4% | +10.5% | +18.8% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | +5.4% | -11.7% | +37.3% | -5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | +23.2% | +24.2% | +46.6% | +44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | -39.3% | -49.5% | +41.2% | -20.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | -28.5% | -36.4% | +38.3% | -6.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.0% | +7.2% | +7.5% | +13.6% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CKX and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CKX is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DEI's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINE currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs JBGS's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.63x | 0.92x | 0.33x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.25 | $24.30 | $16.99 | $20.80 | $32.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $14.03 | $9.04 | $13.10 | $20.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +63.6% | +70.9% | +94.4% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 58.6 | 78.0 | 54.0 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 599K | 2.3M | 176K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CKX and JBGS and DEI and HIW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBGS as "Hold", DEI as "Hold", PINE as "Buy", HIW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for JBGS (target: $18) vs 2.2% for DEI (target: $12). For income investors, HIW offers the higher dividend yield at 7.67% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $12.30 | $20.75 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 33 | 12 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.7% | +6.3% | +0.2% | +7.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.72 | $0.76 | $0.04 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +48.6% | +0.0% | +3.1% | +0.1% |
CKX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). DEI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CKX vs JBGS vs DEI vs PINE vs HIW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (39. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW?
On trailing P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Douglas Emmett, Inc. at 123. 9x. On forward P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW?
Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to -49. 5% for Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINE returned +38. 3% versus DEI's -36. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Douglas Emmett, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning DEI is approximately 203% more volatile than CKX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 131% versus 160% for Douglas Emmett, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CKX Lands, Inc. grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CKX leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW?
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus -27. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINE leads at 30. 5% versus -1. 3% for JBGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CKX leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) trades at 39. 6x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBGS: 16. 4% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW?
In this comparison, HIW (7.
7% yield), DEI (6. 3% yield), JBGS (4. 7% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CKX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CKX or JBGS or DEI or PINE or HIW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBGS: -28. 5%, DEI: -36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CKX and JBGS and DEI and PINE and HIW?
These companies operate in different sectors (CKX (Energy) and JBGS (Real Estate) and DEI (Real Estate) and PINE (Real Estate) and HIW (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CKX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBGS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock. JBGS, DEI, HIW pay a dividend while CKX, PINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.