REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLDT vs WELL vs VTR vs PK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Hotel & Motel
CLDT vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $469M | $149.25B | $41.15B | $2.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $294M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $2.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $1.43B | $260M | $-215M |
| Gross Margin | -3.6% | 39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 71.3x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 24.4x |
| Total Debt | $359M | $21.38B | $13.22B | $4.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33M | $5.03B | $741M | $232M |
CLDT vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chatham Lodging Tru… (CLDT) | 100 | 147.9 | +47.9% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLDT vs WELL vs VTR vs PK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLDT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +48.1% vs PK's +21.9%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage
PK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (24.4x vs 118.0x)
- 12.6% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.4x vs 118.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs PK's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.6% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.1% vs PK's +21.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 0.5% vs 2.2% |
CLDT vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLDT vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLDT leads 1 • VTR leads 0 • PK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 39.6x CLDT's $294M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $294M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $612M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $1.4B | $260M | -$215M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $60M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +12.3% | +4.2% | -8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.6% | +40.3% | +22.0% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +117.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLDT and PK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 71.3x trailing earnings, CLDT trades at a 56% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLDT's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $469M | $149.2B | $41.1B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $796M | $165.6B | $53.6B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 71.29x | 153.25x | 160.26x | -7.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 78.42x | 118.01x | 24.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.23x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 11.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 0.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.87x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 22.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLDT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. CLDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PK's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs PK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 1.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $326M | $16.3B | $12.5B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $33M | $5.0B | $741M | $232M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $359M | $21.4B | $13.2B | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.69x | 0.26x | 1.40x | -0.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,280 for PK. Over the past 12 months, CLDT leads with a +48.1% total return vs PK's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs CLDT's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.2% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.1% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.9% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.0% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -27.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.2% | +223.1% | +65.0% | -11.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLDT and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLDT currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs PK's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.14 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $12.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.08 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $9.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 280K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLDT and WELL and PK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLDT as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", PK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.2% upside for CLDT (target: $11) vs 2.8% for PK (target: $12). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.57% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $11.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 34 | 32 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +2.1% | +12.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CLDT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CLDT vs WELL vs VTR vs PK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) offers the better valuation at 71. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK?
On trailing P/E, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) is the cheapest at 71.
3x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -27. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus CLDT's -29. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 13792% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 138% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chatham Lodging Trust grew EPS 275. 0% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VTR leads at 14. 2% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
(PK) trades at 24. 4x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 93. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLDT: 10. 2% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK?
In this comparison, PK (12.
6% yield), VTR (2. 1% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CLDT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLDT or WELL or VTR or PK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, CLDT: -29. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLDT and WELL and VTR and PK?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLDT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. WELL, VTR, PK pay a dividend while CLDT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.