Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLRB vs PRTC vs ROIV vs ATAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
CLRB vs PRTC vs ROIV vs ATAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Pharmaceuticals |
| Market Cap | $14M | $41M | $20.51B | $964M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $9M | $13M | $3M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-56M | $-809M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | — | -196.2% | 91.2% | -259.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -26.2% | -91.3% | -34.6% |
| Total Debt | $410K | $20M | $100M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $254M | $2.72B | $18M |
CLRB vs PRTC vs ROIV vs ATAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellectar Bioscienc… (CLRB) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| PureTech Health plc (PRTC) | 100 | 34.6 | -65.4% |
| Roivant Sciences Lt… (ROIV) | 100 | 285.9 | +185.9% |
| Atai Beckley N.V (ATAI) | 100 | 21.7 | -78.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLRB vs PRTC vs ROIV vs ATAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLRB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 51.3% revenue growth vs ROIV's -11.2%
- 2.9% margin vs ROIV's -60.8%
PRTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.51
- Beta 0.51, current ratio 6.59x
- Beta 0.51 vs CLRB's 1.76
- -9.9% ROA vs CLRB's -146.9%
ROIV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 171.9% 10Y total return vs ATAI's -47.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 33.47x
ATAI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth -272.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -75.3%
- +188.5% vs CLRB's -55.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.3% revenue growth vs ROIV's -11.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs ROIV's -60.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs CLRB's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +188.5% vs CLRB's -55.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.9% ROA vs CLRB's -146.9% |
CLRB vs PRTC vs ROIV vs ATAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CLRB vs PRTC vs ROIV vs ATAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRTC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ROIV leads 1 • CLRB leads 0 • ATAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROIV and CLRB operate at a comparable scale, with $13M and $0 in trailing revenue. PRTC is the more profitable business, keeping -6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROIV's -60.8%. On growth, ATAI holds the edge at +17.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $9M | $13M | $3M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | -$228M | -$1.2B | -$103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$56M | -$809M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | -$219M | -$767M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -196.2% | +91.2% | -2.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -26.2% | -91.3% | -34.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.2% | -60.8% | -51.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -24.4% | -57.6% | -29.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -30.5% | -77.8% | +17.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | -8.7% | -2.7% | -75.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRTC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $41M | $20.5B | $964M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | -$193M | $17.9B | $971M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.40x | -0.37x | -117.83x | -4.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.79x | 706.10x | 3130.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 0.13x | 3.95x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PRTC and ROIV each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTC delivers a -16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CLRB. ROIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATAI's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTC scores 5/9 vs ATAI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -16.1% | -16.3% | -96.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -146.9% | -9.9% | -15.5% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -66.9% | -50.4% | -45.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -174.7% | -18.8% | -16.4% | -50.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.06x | 0.02x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$234M | -$2.6B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $254M | $2.7B | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $409,586 | $20M | $100M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.16x | — | -68.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ROIV five years ago would be worth $28,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for CLRB. Over the past 12 months, ATAI leads with a +188.5% total return vs CLRB's -55.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROIV at 46.7% vs CLRB's -57.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | +2.0% | +29.0% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.0% | -2.6% | +153.2% | +188.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.4% | -41.3% | +215.6% | +99.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -70.1% | +185.4% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -55.9% | +171.9% | -47.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.7% | -16.3% | +46.7% | +25.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRTC and ROIV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLRB's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROIV currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs CLRB's 16.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 0.51x | 0.95x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.59 | $19.92 | $30.33 | $6.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.43 | $14.50 | $10.58 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.0% | +85.2% | +93.2% | +59.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.7 | 48.2 | 54.8 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 8K | 4.8M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRTC as "Buy", ROIV as "Buy", ATAI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 235.9% upside for PRTC (target: $57) vs 17.4% for ROIV (target: $33).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | $33.20 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 14 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% | +6.3% | 0.0% |
PRTC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ROIV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CLRB vs PRTC vs ROIV vs ATAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLRB or PRTC or ROIV or ATAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atai Beckley N.
V (ATAI) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Roivant Sciences Ltd. (ROIV). Analysts rate PureTech Health plc (PRTC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLRB or PRTC or ROIV or ATAI?
Over the past 5 years, Roivant Sciences Ltd.
(ROIV) delivered a total return of +185. 4%, compared to -99. 2% for Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. (CLRB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROIV returned +171. 9% versus CLRB's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLRB or PRTC or ROIV or ATAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PureTech Health plc (PRTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning CLRB is approximately 247% more volatile than PRTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Roivant Sciences Ltd. (ROIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 21% for Atai Beckley N. V — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CLRB or PRTC or ROIV or ATAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atai Beckley N.
V (ATAI) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -11. 2% for Roivant Sciences Ltd. (ROIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 80. 1% year-over-year, compared to -24. 0% for PureTech Health plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRTC leads at 30. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLRB or PRTC or ROIV or ATAI?
Cellectar Biosciences, Inc.
(CLRB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -484. 6% for Atai Beckley N. V — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLRB leads at 0. 0% versus -333. 4% for ATAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRTC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLRB or PRTC or ROIV or ATAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CLRB or PRTC or ROIV or ATAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PureTech Health plc (PRTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51)). Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. (CLRB) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRTC: -55. 9%, CLRB: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLRB and PRTC and ROIV and ATAI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.