Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLSD vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CLSD vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $1712.35T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 85.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | — |
| Total Debt | $52M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $194M |
CLSD vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clearside Biomedica… (CLSD) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLSD vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLSD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -79.8%, EPS growth 11.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -61.7%
- -79.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
- -87.0% 10Y total return vs CLSD's -99.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -79.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs CLSD's -7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs CLSD's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs CLSD's -96.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -89.0% ROA vs CLSD's -144.9% |
CLSD vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CLSD vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLSD and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $3M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $1712.35T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $1712.35T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs CLSD's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -144.9% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -121.5% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.39x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DBVT five years ago would be worth $3,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $100 for CLSD. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs CLSD's -96.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs CLSD's -70.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.3% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.8% | +110.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -69.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -87.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.9% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DBVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSD's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DBVT currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs CLSD's 2.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.09 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.9% | +76.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DBVT leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
CLSD vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLSD or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLSD or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) delivered a total return of -69. 1%, compared to -99. 0% for Clearside Biomedical, Inc. (CLSD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DBVT returned -87. 0% versus CLSD's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLSD or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Clearside Biomedical, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning CLSD is approximately 111% more volatile than DBVT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CLSD or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearside Biomedical, Inc.
grew EPS 11. 3% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLSD or DBVT?
DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -20. 6% for Clearside Biomedical, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DBVT leads at 0. 0% versus -1735. 7% for CLSD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSD leads at 91. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLSD or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CLSD or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Clearside Biomedical, Inc. (CLSD) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DBVT: -87. 0%, CLSD: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLSD and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.