Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CLSK vs NVDA vs AMD vs SMCI vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Computer Hardware
Semiconductors
CLSK vs NVDA vs AMD vs SMCI vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.58B | $5.14T | $665.93B | $20.14B | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $785M | $215.94B | $37.45B | $33.70B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-261M | $120.07B | $4.99B | $1.78B | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 8.4% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | 60.4% | 11.7% | 4.5% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 25.6x | 59.7x | 15.1x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $824M | $11.41B | $4.47B | $4.78B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $5.17B | $14.27B |
CLSK vs NVDA vs AMD vs SMCI vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 695.5 | +595.5% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2381.7 | +2281.7% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 759.2 | +659.2% |
| Super Micro Compute… (SMCI) | 100 | 1293.1 | +1193.1% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLSK vs NVDA vs AMD vs SMCI vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.39, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- 102.2% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
- 0.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs AMD's 110.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- Beta 1.73, yield 0.0%, current ratio 3.91x
- 55.6% margin vs CLSK's -33.2%
Among these 5 stocks, AMD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SMCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.25 vs AMD's 11.55
- Lower P/E (15.1x vs 105.1x)
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +439.7% vs SMCI's +3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs CLSK's -33.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs CLSK's 3.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs SMCI's +3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs CLSK's -8.5%, ROIC 81.8% vs 10.3% |
CLSK vs NVDA vs AMD vs SMCI vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLSK vs NVDA vs AMD vs SMCI vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories
SMCI leads 1 • CLSK leads 1 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 275.0x CLSK's $785M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLSK's -33.2%. On growth, SMCI holds the edge at +122.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $785M | $215.9B | $37.5B | $33.7B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $181M | $133.2B | $6.6B | $1.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$261M | $120.1B | $5.0B | $1.8B | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.0B | $96.7B | $8.6B | -$6.8B | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +8.4% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +60.4% | +11.7% | +4.5% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.2% | +55.6% | +13.3% | +5.3% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -133.1% | +44.8% | +22.9% | -20.3% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.6% | +73.2% | +37.8% | +122.7% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +97.8% | +90.9% | +3.3% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SMCI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 92% valuation discount to AMD's 154.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMCI offers better value at 0.33x vs AMD's 29.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $5.14T | $665.9B | $20.1B | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $5.14T | $664.9B | $19.7B | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.48x | 43.16x | 154.14x | 20.01x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.55x | 59.65x | 15.14x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 29.84x | 0.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.53x | 38.59x | 99.26x | 15.06x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.67x | 23.80x | 19.22x | 0.92x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 32.85x | 10.61x | 3.35x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.17x | 98.88x | 13.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-14 for CLSK. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMCI's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.7% | +76.3% | +8.1% | +26.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.5% | +58.1% | +6.5% | +8.9% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +81.8% | +4.7% | +15.9% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | +97.2% | +5.7% | +13.1% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 0.76x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $781M | $807M | -$1.1B | -$391M | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $5.2B | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $824M | $11.4B | $4.5B | $4.8B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.49x | 545.03x | 33.19x | 10.86x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,306 for CLSK. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs SMCI's +3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs SMCI's 35.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.0% | +12.0% | +82.8% | +8.6% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.1% | +80.7% | +307.0% | +3.5% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.7% | +625.9% | +329.8% | +146.1% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.9% | +1328.9% | +418.3% | +823.6% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | +23902.3% | +11090.7% | +1149.8% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.8% | +93.6% | +62.6% | +35.0% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSK's 3.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs SMCI's 53.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.39x | 1.73x | 2.30x | 2.76x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.61 | $216.80 | $430.57 | $62.36 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.91 | $112.28 | $96.88 | $19.49 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.2% | +97.6% | +94.9% | +53.9% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.5 | 60.7 | 81.2 | 69.9 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19.0M | 164.5M | 36.4M | 38.1M | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLSK as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", SMCI as "Hold", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs -29.6% for INTC (target: $77). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.21 | $278.83 | $310.86 | $46.29 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 79 | 70 | 22 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $0.04 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SMCI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CLSK vs NVDA vs AMD vs SMCI vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 154. 1x. On forward P/E, Super Micro Computer, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Super Micro Computer, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -26.
9% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 39β — meaning CLSK is approximately 97% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 76% for Super Micro Computer, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Super Micro Computer, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -0. 0% for INTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 105. 1x for Intel Corporation — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 44. 6% to $20. 21.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA, AMD, SMCI, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLSK or NVDA or AMD or SMCI or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1150% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMCI: +1150%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLSK and NVDA and AMD and SMCI and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; SMCI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.