Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $66M | $1.63B | $4.61B | $3.09B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $422M | $739M | $627M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $103M | $243M | $-398M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 61.0% | 70.8% | 5.8% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 29.8% | 36.8% | -84.2% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 28.9x | 14.4x | 15.9x | 10.3x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $184M | $197M | $641M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $57M | $763M | $380M | $599M |
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst Bancorp, I… (CLST) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 87.1 | -12.9% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 42.7 | -57.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 55.3%, EPS growth 171.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 18.0%, current ratio 0.40x
- NIM 3.5% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- 55.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
LKFN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- 142.7% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 30.2% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
- 1.6% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 11.0% vs -9.1%
Among these 5 stocks, SFNC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.31 vs LKFN's 3.63
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs SFNC's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs SFNC's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.4% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 11.0% vs -9.1% |
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • CLST leads 1 • LKFN leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 710.3x CLST's $15M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $422M | $739M | $627M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $130M | $310M | -$497M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $103M | $243M | -$398M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $104M | $290M | $755M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +61.0% | +70.8% | +5.8% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +29.8% | +36.8% | -84.2% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +24.5% | +30.2% | -63.4% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +24.6% | +39.6% | +71.7% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.8% | +23.4% | -7.7% | +42.1% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, LKFN trades at a 75% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FIS offers better value at 2.58x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66M | $1.6B | $4.6B | $3.1B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $1.8B | $4.0B | $3.4B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.88x | 15.61x | 20.76x | -7.24x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.42x | 15.92x | 10.35x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.93x | 3.98x | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.02x | 13.49x | 14.17x | — | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.28x | 3.87x | 6.23x | 4.93x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 2.12x | 2.89x | 0.84x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.18x | 15.72x | 15.73x | 6.88x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLST scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +14.2% | +13.3% | -11.6% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.5% | +1.6% | -1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +11.6% | +11.0% | -9.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +15.8% | +16.0% | -4.2% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.24x | 0.12x | 0.19x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $127M | -$566M | $261M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $57M | $763M | $380M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $184M | $197M | $641M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.82x | 1.48x | -1.01x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLST five years ago would be worth $11,925 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CLST leads with a +40.4% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLST at 19.1% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +12.7% | +8.5% | +14.6% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.4% | +9.0% | -3.2% | +16.7% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.1% | +48.1% | +29.1% | +53.4% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +10.5% | -28.2% | -15.4% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +142.7% | +145.4% | +25.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +14.0% | +8.9% | +15.3% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLST and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLST is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 0.79x | 0.95x | 1.02x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.16 | $69.40 | $38.74 | $22.18 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.52 | $54.36 | $28.11 | $17.00 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +90.2% | +83.6% | +96.3% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 60.9 | 58.2 | 62.3 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 153K | 740K | 1.2M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LKFN and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LKFN as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 5.4% for LKFN (target: $66). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $66.00 | $39.25 | $22.67 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 15 | 9 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +2.2% | +4.0% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 11 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.00 | $0.72 | $0.85 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger pick with 55. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the cheapest at 15.
6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) delivered a total return of +19. 2%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 5346% more volatile than CLST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 29% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is pulling ahead at 55. 3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 171. 8% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLST leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
In this comparison, SFNC (4.
0% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), LKFN (3. 2% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CLST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLST or LKFN or FFIN or SFNC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLST: +19. 2%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLST and LKFN and FFIN and SFNC and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLST (Financial Services) and LKFN (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CLST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. LKFN, FFIN, SFNC, FIS pay a dividend while CLST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.