Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCL vs BTG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
CMCL vs BTG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $451M | $6.65B | $6.55B | $11.63B | $94.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $264M | $3.06B | $1.82B | $2.57B | $11.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $402M | $510M | $799M | $4.45B |
| Gross Margin | 52.0% | 50.0% | 46.4% | 35.4% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 44.3% | 45.9% | 40.0% | 39.4% | 52.9% |
| Forward P/E | 6.2x | 6.5x | 7.8x | 9.1x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $629M | $1.30B | $365M | $321M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $380M | $868M | $554M | $2.87B |
CMCL vs BTG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caledonia Mining Co… (CMCL) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| B2Gold Corp. (BTG) | 100 | 90.3 | -9.7% |
| Eldorado Gold Corpo… (EGO) | 100 | 394.6 | +294.6% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
| Agnico Eagle Mines … (AEM) | 100 | 293.3 | +193.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCL vs BTG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 4.4%
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 13.5x)
- 4.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BTG's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 14.2% ROA vs BTG's 7.3%, ROIC 32.4% vs 30.0%
BTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, EGO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- PEG 0.17 vs CMCL's 0.60
- 96.4% revenue growth vs CMCL's 38.9%
- +216.1% vs AEM's +61.4%
AEM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 351.2% 10Y total return vs CMCL's 478.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.02x
- Beta 0.52, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.02x
- 37.5% margin vs BTG's 13.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs CMCL's 38.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 13.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs BTG's 13.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs CDE's 1.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BTG's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.1% vs AEM's +61.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs BTG's 7.3%, ROIC 32.4% vs 30.0% |
CMCL vs BTG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMCL vs BTG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMCL leads in 3 of 6 categories
AEM leads 1 • CDE leads 1 • BTG leads 0 • EGO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEM is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.9B annually — 45.0x CMCL's $264M. AEM is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BTG's 13.1%. On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $264M | $3.1B | $1.8B | $2.6B | $11.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $132M | $1.8B | $993M | $1.2B | $7.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $402M | $510M | $799M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $59M | -$184M | $915M | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.0% | +50.0% | +46.4% | +35.4% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +45.9% | +40.0% | +39.4% | +52.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +13.1% | +28.0% | +31.1% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +1.9% | -10.1% | +35.6% | +37.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.4% | +110.9% | +34.5% | +137.8% | +64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.3% | — | +134.6% | +4.9% | +199.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, CMCL trades at a 61% valuation discount to AEM's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs CMCL's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $451M | $6.6B | $6.6B | $11.6B | $94.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $448M | $6.9B | $7.0B | $11.4B | $91.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.25x | 17.68x | 13.21x | 20.13x | 21.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.20x | 6.49x | 7.76x | 9.10x | 13.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.80x | — | 0.49x | 0.39x | 0.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.41x | 3.74x | 6.72x | 11.19x | 11.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.77x | 2.17x | 3.54x | 5.62x | 7.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | 2.02x | 1.59x | 3.56x | 3.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.39x | 100.16x | — | 17.48x | 22.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCL delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $12 for BTG. AEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGO's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEM scores 8/9 vs CDE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.7% | +11.9% | +12.4% | +15.2% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.2% | +7.3% | +8.0% | +11.2% | +13.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +32.4% | +30.0% | +13.3% | +23.5% | +21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.3% | +31.1% | +13.5% | +23.9% | +20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.17x | 0.30x | 0.11x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $250M | $428M | -$188M | -$2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $380M | $868M | $554M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $629M | $1.3B | $365M | $321M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 33.33x | 26.91x | 20.66x | 47.33x | 73.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGO five years ago would be worth $29,798 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,886 for BTG. Over the past 12 months, CDE leads with a +216.1% total return vs AEM's +61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 72.6% vs BTG's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | +10.4% | -6.2% | +3.2% | +10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.5% | +62.8% | +66.3% | +216.1% | +61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.2% | +30.6% | +178.5% | +414.6% | +224.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.4% | +8.9% | +198.0% | +96.0% | +183.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +478.3% | +197.9% | +58.6% | +149.9% | +351.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +9.3% | +40.7% | +72.6% | +48.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BTG and AEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTG currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs CMCL's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 0.94x | 0.57x | 1.81x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.75 | $6.29 | $51.16 | $27.77 | $255.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.05 | $2.86 | $17.18 | $5.55 | $103.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +78.7% | +64.8% | +65.2% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 45.5 | 45.3 | 49.3 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 189K | 31.0M | 3.0M | 22.2M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMCL as "Buy", BTG as "Buy", EGO as "Hold", CDE as "Buy", AEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs -26.1% for CMCL (target: $17). For income investors, CMCL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.37% vs AEM's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.25 | $6.25 | $52.67 | $29.00 | $237.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 9 | 24 | 21 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +1.4% | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $0.07 | — | — | $1.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.3% | +0.1% | +0.7% |
CMCL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AEM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CMCL vs BTG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 9% for Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL). Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM?
On trailing P/E, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the cheapest at 8.
3x versus Agnico Eagle Mines Limited at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 17x versus Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc's 0. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM?
Over the past 5 years, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) delivered a total return of +198.
0%, compared to +8. 9% for B2Gold Corp. (BTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMCL returned +478. 3% versus EGO's +58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 246% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Eldorado Gold Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 38. 9% for Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc. grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to 78. 0% for Eldorado Gold Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM?
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
5% net margin versus 13. 1% for B2Gold Corp. — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus 36. 3% for CDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc's 0. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 5x for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM?
In this comparison, CMCL (4.
4% yield), BTG (1. 4% yield), AEM (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. EGO, CDE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMCL or BTG or EGO or CDE or AEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 0. 8% yield, +351. 2% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +351. 2%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMCL and BTG and EGO and CDE and AEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CMCL, BTG, AEM pay a dividend while EGO, CDE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.