Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMCL vs GORO vs MUX vs HL vs CDE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • JE
Market Cap$451M
5Y Perf.+49.8%
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.-63.3%
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.+158.6%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.63B
5Y Perf.+215.0%

CMCL vs GORO vs MUX vs HL vs CDE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMCL logoCMCL
GORO logoGORO
MUX logoMUX
HL logoHL
CDE logoCDE
IndustryGoldGoldOther Precious MetalsGoldGold
Market Cap$451M$231M$1.39B$12.13B$11.63B
Revenue (TTM)$264M$93M$162M$1.57B$2.57B
Net Income (TTM)$55M$-6M$74M$559M$799M
Gross Margin52.0%18.9%32.9%50.9%35.4%
Operating Margin44.3%13.1%22.2%44.1%39.4%
Forward P/E6.2x28.6x22.2x19.1x9.1x
Total Debt$33M$91M$926K$299M$365M
Cash & Equiv.$36M$25M$51M$242M$554M

CMCL vs GORO vs MUX vs HL vs CDELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMCL
GORO
MUX
HL
CDE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Caledonia Mining Co… (CMCL)100149.8+49.8%
Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO)10036.7-63.3%
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)100258.6+158.6%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100315.0+215.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMCL vs GORO vs MUX vs HL vs CDE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CMCL and HL are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Hecla Mining Company is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GORO, MUX, and CDE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
The Income Pick

CMCL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 4.4%
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 19.1x)
  • 4.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MUX's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation
The Defensive Pick

GORO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, current ratio 2.85x
  • Beta 0.38, current ratio 2.85x
  • Beta 0.38 vs CDE's 1.81
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Quality Compounder

MUX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 45.7% margin vs GORO's -6.9%
Best for: quality
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs CMCL's 478.3%
  • +271.0% vs CMCL's +72.5%
  • 16.3% ROA vs GORO's -4.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs 13.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Growth Play

CDE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • PEG 0.17 vs CMCL's 0.60
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs MUX's 13.2%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs MUX's 13.2%
ValueCMCL logoCMCLLower P/E (6.2x vs 19.1x)
Quality / MarginsMUX logoMUX45.7% margin vs GORO's -6.9%
Stability / SafetyGORO logoGOROBeta 0.38 vs CDE's 1.81
DividendsCMCL logoCMCL4.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MUX's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+271.0% vs CMCL's +72.5%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs GORO's -4.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs 13.5%

CMCL vs GORO vs MUX vs HL vs CDE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMCLCaledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Segment breakdown not available.

GOROGold Resource Corporation
FY 2025
Concentrate
48.4%$92M
Silver Concentrate
34.8%$66M
Gold Concentrate
8.7%$17M
Zinc Concentrate
4.4%$8M
Copper Concentrate
1.3%$2M
Lead Concentrate
1.0%$2M
Dore
0.7%$1M
Other (2)
0.7%$1M
MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
FY 2025
United States Reportable Segment
59.1%$117M
Canada Reportable Segment
38.5%$76M
Mexico Reportable Segment
2.4%$5M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M

CMCL vs GORO vs MUX vs HL vs CDE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMCLLAGGINGCDE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CMCL and CDE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 27.5x GORO's $93M. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GORO's -6.9%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMCL logoCMCLCaledonia Mining …GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$264M$93M$162M$1.6B$2.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$132M$25M$61M$853M$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$55M-$6M$74M$559M$799M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$40M-$4M-$24M$472M$915M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.0%+18.9%+32.9%+50.9%+35.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+44.3%+13.1%+22.2%+44.1%+39.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.9%-6.9%+45.7%+35.6%+31.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.2%-4.2%-14.7%+30.0%+35.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.4%+2.5%-100.0%+57.4%+137.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+73.3%+193.3%+4.9%-160.0%+4.9%
Evenly matched — CMCL and CDE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CMCL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.3x trailing earnings, CMCL trades at a 79% valuation discount to MUX's 39.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs CMCL's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCMCL logoCMCLCaledonia Mining …GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$451M$231M$1.4B$12.1B$11.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$448M$297M$1.3B$12.2B$11.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.25x-30.43x39.61x36.92x20.13x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.20x28.60x22.21x19.07x9.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.80x0.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.41x11.93x74.65x17.25x11.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.77x2.48x7.03x8.53x5.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.61x4.46x2.31x4.58x3.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.39x359.20x39.11x17.48x
CMCL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HL leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-23 for GORO. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs MUX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCMCL logoCMCLCaledonia Mining …GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.7%-22.7%+13.6%+22.5%+15.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.2%-4.0%+9.0%+16.3%+11.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+32.4%+13.5%-1.9%+15.3%+23.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+35.3%+8.2%-1.9%+16.8%+23.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977586
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x2.07x0.00x0.12x0.11x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$66M-$50M$57M-$188M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$36M$25M$51M$242M$554M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$33M$91M$926,000$299M$365M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense33.33x0.73x-1.52x19.04x47.33x
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — HL and CDE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,415 for GORO. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs CMCL's +72.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 72.6% vs GORO's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMCL logoCMCLCaledonia Mining …GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.8%+70.2%+25.1%-4.1%+3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+72.5%+143.4%+198.5%+271.0%+216.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+75.2%+50.5%+163.5%+194.9%+414.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.4%-45.8%+79.8%+150.3%+96.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+478.3%-47.8%-0.1%+360.6%+149.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.5%+14.6%+38.1%+43.4%+72.6%
Evenly matched — HL and CDE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GORO and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GORO is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMCL logoCMCLCaledonia Mining …GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.28x0.38x1.27x1.26x1.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.75$1.87$29.70$34.17$27.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.05$0.43$6.88$4.68$5.55
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.3%+76.5%+78.7%+52.9%+65.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.247.951.046.649.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded189K1.8M992K15.4M22.2M
Evenly matched — GORO and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CMCL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMCL as "Buy", GORO as "Buy", MUX as "Buy", HL as "Hold", CDE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs -26.1% for CMCL (target: $17). For income investors, CMCL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.37% vs MUX's 0.18%.

MetricCMCL logoCMCLCaledonia Mining …GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.25$2.00$30.00$23.83$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2472621
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.4%+0.2%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02$0.04$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0%+0.1%
CMCL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CMCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). HL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallCaledonia Mining Corporatio… (CMCL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMCL vs GORO vs MUX vs HL vs CDE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE?

On trailing P/E, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the cheapest at 8.

3x versus McEwen Mining Inc. at 39. 6x. On forward P/E, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 17x versus Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc's 0. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to -45. 8% for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMCL returned +478. 3% versus GORO's -47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 382% more volatile than GORO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 92. 3% for Gold Resource Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -6. 9% for Gold Resource Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMCL leads at 45. 5% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCL leads at 54. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc's 0. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Gold Resource Corporation — 22. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE?

In this comparison, CMCL (4.

4% yield), MUX (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GORO, HL, CDE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CMCL or GORO or MUX or HL or CDE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

28), 4. 4% yield, +478. 3% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCL: +478. 3%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMCL and GORO and MUX and HL and CDE?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CMCL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CMCL pays a dividend while GORO, MUX, HL, CDE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CMCL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GORO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 122%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MUX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CMCL and GORO and MUX and HL and CDE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CMCL: 49.4% · GORO: 245.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.