Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMLS vs NXST vs GTN vs SBGI vs SIRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Broadcasting
Entertainment
Entertainment
CMLS vs NXST vs GTN vs SBGI vs SIRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $87K | $5.89B | $412M | $991M | $9.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $772M | $5.11B | $3.08B | $3.17B | $8.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-297M | $165M | $-76M | $-112M | $846M |
| Gross Margin | 62.7% | 32.3% | 115.0% | 44.8% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | -31.3% | 17.8% | 12.4% | 5.5% | 18.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.9x | 1.8x | 12.3x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $795M | $6.86B | $5.81B | $4.52B | $9.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $280M | $368M | $866M | $94M |
CMLS vs NXST vs GTN vs SBGI vs SIRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Nexstar Media Group… (NXST) | 100 | 301.3 | +201.3% |
| Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) | 100 | 37.2 | -62.8% |
| Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI) | 100 | 87.4 | -12.6% |
| Sirius XM Holdings … (SIRI) | 100 | 37.7 | -62.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMLS vs NXST vs GTN vs SBGI vs SIRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMLS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NXST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 331.4% 10Y total return vs SIRI's -7.8%
GTN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.54, yield 7.7%
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 8.5x)
- 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NXST's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SBGI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.75, yield 7.0%, current ratio 2.42x
SIRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth 145.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 0.30x
- -1.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1%
- 9.9% margin vs CMLS's -38.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 8.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs CMLS's -38.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CMLS's 1.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NXST's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.6% vs CMLS's -96.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 5.2% vs -20.5% |
CMLS vs NXST vs GTN vs SBGI vs SIRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMLS vs NXST vs GTN vs SBGI vs SIRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIRI leads in 2 of 6 categories
NXST leads 1 • GTN leads 1 • CMLS leads 0 • SBGI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.6B annually — 11.1x CMLS's $772M. SIRI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMLS's -38.4%. On growth, NXST holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $772M | $5.1B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$185M | $2.0B | $932M | $475M | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$297M | $165M | -$76M | -$112M | $846M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $708M | -$74M | $115M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.7% | +32.3% | +115.0% | +44.8% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.3% | +17.8% | +12.4% | +5.5% | +18.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.4% | +3.2% | -2.5% | -3.5% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +13.8% | -2.4% | +3.6% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | +13.1% | -1.8% | -16.7% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.8% | +51.0% | +98.5% | -40.8% | +22.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CMLS and GTN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, SIRI trades at a 82% valuation discount to NXST's 64.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NXST's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBGI's 9.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $87,200 | $5.9B | $412M | $991M | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $731M | $12.5B | $5.9B | $4.6B | $18.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 64.75x | -5.03x | -8.81x | 11.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.88x | 1.81x | 12.28x | 8.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.57x | 9.31x | 9.74x | 9.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.19x | 0.13x | 0.31x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.89x | 0.15x | 2.65x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.93x | 2.27x | 8.62x | 7.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NXST and SIRI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NXST delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-193 for CMLS. SIRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMLS's 114.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NXST scores 5/9 vs SBGI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -193.0% | +10.0% | -2.9% | -34.3% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.1% | +1.9% | -0.7% | -2.0% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.5% | +7.4% | +3.5% | +2.8% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.0% | +8.2% | +3.9% | +2.9% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 114.33x | 3.33x | 2.07x | 12.21x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $731M | $6.6B | $5.4B | $3.7B | $9.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $280M | $368M | $866M | $94M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $795M | $6.9B | $5.8B | $4.5B | $9.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.03x | 1.81x | 1.12x | 0.76x | 3.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NXST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NXST five years ago would be worth $15,010 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for CMLS. Over the past 12 months, SIRI leads with a +31.6% total return vs CMLS's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NXST at 8.9% vs CMLS's -87.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.2% | -6.1% | -6.0% | -5.2% | +31.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.2% | +29.4% | +27.7% | -3.3% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +29.1% | -26.1% | +5.3% | -17.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +50.1% | -72.7% | -43.1% | -43.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +331.4% | -50.5% | -28.9% | -7.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.6% | +8.9% | -9.6% | +1.7% | -6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SIRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMLS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIRI currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs CMLS's 2.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.68x | 1.54x | 0.76x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.20 | $254.30 | $6.43 | $17.88 | $28.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $154.64 | $3.50 | $11.89 | $19.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.5% | +76.4% | +68.9% | +79.3% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.5 | 43.2 | 52.8 | 46.3 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 402K | 1.3M | 491K | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXST as "Buy", GTN as "Buy", SBGI as "Buy", SIRI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.6% upside for GTN (target: $8) vs 0.0% for SIRI (target: $27). For income investors, GTN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.68% vs NXST's 2.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $250.00 | $8.00 | $17.00 | $26.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 9 | 20 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +7.7% | +7.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.50 | $0.34 | $1.00 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
SIRI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). NXST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CMLS vs NXST vs GTN vs SBGI vs SIRI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI?
On trailing P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus Nexstar Media Group, Inc. at 64. 8x. On forward P/E, Gray Media, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI?
Over the past 5 years, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
(NXST) delivered a total return of +50. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXST returned +347. 4% versus CMLS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Cumulus Media Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CMLS is approximately 183% more volatile than SIRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 114% for Cumulus Media Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. grew EPS 145. 6% year-over-year, compared to -145. 8% for Cumulus Media Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SIRI leads at -1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI?
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -34. 2% for Cumulus Media Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXST leads at 17. 4% versus -29. 0% for CMLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Sinclair, Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTN: 80. 6% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI?
In this comparison, GTN (7.
7% yield), SBGI (7. 0% yield), SIRI (3. 8% yield), NXST (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CMLS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMLS or NXST or GTN or SBGI or SIRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
(NXST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 8% yield, +347. 4% 10Y return). Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXST: +347. 4%, CMLS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMLS and NXST and GTN and SBGI and SIRI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SBGI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SIRI is a small-cap deep-value stock. NXST, GTN, SBGI, SIRI pay a dividend while CMLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 68%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 26%
- Dividend Yield > 2.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.