Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMPO vs IDCC vs OSIS vs TPVG vs ENTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Asset Management
Semiconductors
CMPO vs IDCC vs OSIS vs TPVG vs ENTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Asset Management | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.06B | $7.18B | $3.97B | $243M | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $161M | $829M | $1.81B | $97M | $3.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-217M | $366M | $152M | $-12M | $265M |
| Gross Margin | 50.6% | 83.4% | 32.8% | 83.5% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 49.6% | 12.1% | 77.9% | 29.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 38.8x | 23.0x | 6.5x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $202M | $506M | $682M | $469M | $3.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $739M | $106M | $20M | $360M |
CMPO vs IDCC vs OSIS vs TPVG vs ENTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO) | 100 | 200.9 | +100.9% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 611.8 | +511.8% |
| OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) | 100 | 323.7 | +223.7% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 40.3 | -59.7% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMPO vs IDCC vs OSIS vs TPVG vs ENTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMPO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IDCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 436.7% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 45.9%, current ratio 1.84x
- PEG 0.74 vs TPVG's 6.41
- Lower P/E (38.8x vs 41.4x)
Among these 5 stocks, OSIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TPVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- Beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
ENTG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +88.9% vs OSIS's +8.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.8x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs CMPO's -134.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs ENTG's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.9% vs OSIS's +8.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.7% ROA vs CMPO's -54.5%, ROIC 40.9% vs 205.9% |
CMPO vs IDCC vs OSIS vs TPVG vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CMPO vs IDCC vs OSIS vs TPVG vs ENTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories
IDCC leads 1 • CMPO leads 0 • OSIS leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENTG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 33.3x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMPO's -134.8%. On growth, ENTG holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $161M | $829M | $1.8B | $97M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$186M | $489M | $229M | -$22M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$217M | $366M | $152M | -$12M | $265M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $580M | $77M | $35M | $721M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.6% | +83.4% | +32.8% | +83.5% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +49.6% | +12.1% | +77.9% | +29.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -134.8% | +44.2% | +8.4% | +50.6% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +70.0% | +4.2% | -58.7% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -2.4% | +2.0% | — | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.6% | -38.0% | -3.8% | -2.3% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 95% valuation discount to ENTG's 95.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $7.2B | $4.0B | $243M | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $6.9B | $4.6B | $691M | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.53x | 23.62x | 27.68x | 4.91x | 95.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.17x | 38.81x | 23.05x | 6.50x | 41.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 1.67x | 4.84x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.73x | 12.91x | 17.43x | 9.13x | 19.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.91x | 8.61x | 2.32x | 2.50x | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.73x | 4.35x | 0.68x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.89x | 13.58x | 70.85x | — | 56.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC delivers a 33.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. IDCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDCC scores 6/9 vs CMPO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +33.4% | +16.7% | -3.4% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.5% | +17.7% | +6.3% | -1.5% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +40.9% | +11.5% | +7.2% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +38.6% | +38.1% | +16.3% | +9.4% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.46x | 0.72x | 1.33x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $124M | -$233M | $576M | $449M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $739M | $106M | $20M | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $202M | $506M | $682M | $469M | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.42x | 11.48x | 11.43x | -1.02x | 2.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IDCC and ENTG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, ENTG leads with a +88.9% total return vs OSIS's +8.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.6% | -14.1% | -5.7% | -6.3% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | +32.4% | +8.9% | +19.3% | +88.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.4% | +251.7% | +103.9% | -3.4% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.3% | +303.1% | +149.9% | -13.5% | +30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.7% | +436.7% | +372.9% | +93.3% | +1040.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.8% | +52.1% | +26.8% | -1.2% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TPVG and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENTG currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs CMPO's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.12x | 1.44x | 0.83x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.78 | $412.60 | $311.27 | $7.53 | $159.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.16 | $205.78 | $204.00 | $4.48 | $66.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.7% | +67.6% | +77.5% | +79.5% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.3 | 30.8 | 30.1 | 58.3 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 393K | 285K | 504K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IDCC and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMPO as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", OSIS as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs 2.9% for ENTG (target: $152). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $425.00 | $293.50 | $8.95 | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 16 | 17 | 12 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.6% | — | +17.1% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.76 | — | $1.02 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IDCC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CMPO vs IDCC vs OSIS vs TPVG vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Entegris, Inc. at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InterDigital, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENTG returned +1040% versus TPVG's +93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 220% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -325. 9% for CompoSecure, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDCC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -12. 8% for CompoSecure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 12. 7% for OSIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Entegris, Inc. — 34. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield), CMPO (1. 2% yield), IDCC (0. 6% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. OSIS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMPO or IDCC or OSIS or TPVG or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, ENTG: +1040%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMPO and IDCC and OSIS and TPVG and ENTG?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMPO (Industrials) and IDCC (Technology) and OSIS (Technology) and TPVG (Financial Services) and ENTG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMPO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OSIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CMPO, IDCC, TPVG pay a dividend while OSIS, ENTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.