Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CMPR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
Integrated Freight & Logistics
CMPR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $2.23B | $2.92T | $145.00B | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.56B | $742.78B | $12.37B | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $90.80B | $1.33B | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 50.6% | 48.0% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 11.5% | 13.3% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 28.0x | 34.8x | 60.9x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $152.99B | $188M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $86.81B | $1.53B | $5.89B |
CMPR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cimpress plc (CMPR) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMPR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMPR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +122.6% vs UPS's +13.5%
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 12.2% margin vs CMPR's 0.7%
- 11.5% ROA vs CMPR's 1.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 17.8%
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth -39.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5%
UPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 1.22x
- PEG 0.42 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Beta 0.90, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CMPR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +122.6% vs UPS's +13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs CMPR's 1.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 17.8% |
CMPR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMPR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SHOP leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • CMPR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMZN and SHOP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 208.4x CMPR's $3.6B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMPR's 0.7%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $742.8B | $12.4B | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $387M | $155.9B | $1.7B | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | $90.8B | $1.3B | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | -$2.5B | $2.1B | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +50.6% | +48.0% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +11.5% | +13.3% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +12.2% | +10.8% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -0.3% | +17.2% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | +16.6% | +34.3% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.4% | +74.8% | +15.1% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 90% valuation discount to CMPR's 158.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $2.92T | $145.0B | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $2.98T | $143.7B | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 158.59x | 37.82x | 118.87x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.96x | 34.77x | 60.91x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 4.06x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.09x | 20.47x | 95.83x | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 4.07x | 12.55x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.14x | 10.82x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.41x | 378.98x | 72.25x | 17.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHOP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $11 for SHOP. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs UPS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +23.3% | +10.5% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +11.5% | +9.0% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.8% | +14.7% | +9.4% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +15.3% | +11.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x | 0.01x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $66.2B | -$1.3B | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $86.8B | $1.5B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $153.0B | $188M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.95x | 39.96x | — | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,997 for UPS. Over the past 12 months, CMPR leads with a +122.6% total return vs UPS's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs UPS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.1% | +19.7% | -28.9% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.6% | +43.7% | +18.2% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.6% | +156.2% | +73.6% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | +64.8% | +0.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +697.8% | +4123.0% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.7% | +36.8% | +20.2% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and UPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SHOP's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.51x | 2.64x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.02 | $278.56 | $182.19 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.44 | $185.01 | $88.14 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +97.3% | +61.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 81.1 | 34.7 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 120K | 45.5M | 8.7M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMPR as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy", UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 11.4% for CMPR (target: $103). UPS is the only dividend payer here at 6.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.50 | $306.77 | $164.75 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 94 | 63 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
UPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). SHOP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CMPR vs AMZN vs SHOP vs UPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Cimpress plc at 158. 6x. On forward P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -40. 0% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus CMPR's -1. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 192% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -91. 0% for Cimpress plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 0. 4% for Cimpress plc — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHOP leads at 12. 7% versus 6. 6% for CMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 46. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CMPR, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMPR or AMZN or SHOP or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMPR and AMZN and SHOP and UPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMPR (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. UPS pays a dividend while CMPR, AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 28%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.