Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CNDT vs WEX vs FLYW vs UIS vs EVTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
CNDT vs WEX vs FLYW vs UIS vs EVTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $283M | $5.00B | $2.12B | $221M | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.04B | $2.70B | $188.60B | $1.96B | $951M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-170M | $310M | $12.54B | $-346M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 57.4% | 0.2% | 28.4% | 46.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 24.7% | 5.7% | 7.4% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.4x | 49.5x | 4.0x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $789M | $4.86B | $0.00 | $803M | $1.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $233M | $906M | $330M | $414M | $306M |
CNDT vs WEX vs FLYW vs UIS vs EVTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conduent Incorporat… (CNDT) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 76.7 | -23.3% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Unisys Corporation (UIS) | 100 | 10.2 | -89.8% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNDT vs WEX vs FLYW vs UIS vs EVTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNDT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.72, yield 3.4%
- 3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EVTC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, WEX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4%
- +62.7% vs UIS's -35.7%
UIS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 49.5x)
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs WEX's 60.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.76, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- 13.9% margin vs UIS's -17.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs UIS's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs UIS's 2.34 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EVTC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs UIS's -35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs UIS's -19.4%, ROIC 10.2% vs 16.7% |
CNDT vs WEX vs FLYW vs UIS vs EVTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNDT vs WEX vs FLYW vs UIS vs EVTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WEX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CNDT leads 2 • EVTC leads 1 • FLYW leads 0 • UIS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 198.3x EVTC's $951M. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UIS's -17.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $2.7B | $188.6B | $2.0B | $951M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $321M | $952M | $10.8B | $241M | $316M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$170M | $310M | $12.5B | -$346M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$147M | $460M | -$15.8B | -$185M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +57.4% | +0.2% | +28.4% | +46.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +24.7% | +5.7% | +7.4% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +11.5% | +6.6% | -17.7% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +17.0% | -8.4% | -9.5% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +5.8% | +1408.6% | +1.3% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -146.0% | +22.7% | +4.0% | -19.0% | -24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CNDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNDT's 2.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $283M | $5.0B | $2.1B | $221M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $9.0B | $1.8B | $610M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.61x | 17.03x | 161.18x | -0.64x | 10.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.43x | 49.50x | 3.95x | 5.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.54x | 8.89x | 47.80x | 2.67x | 7.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 1.88x | 3.40x | 0.11x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 4.20x | 2.71x | — | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.94x | 21.41x | — | 10.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEX delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-21 for CNDT. CNDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.95x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEX's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs UIS's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.6% | +27.0% | +5.9% | — | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.1% | +2.1% | +4.3% | -19.4% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +9.6% | +2.1% | +16.7% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +13.4% | +1.3% | +11.0% | +10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.95x | 3.94x | — | — | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $556M | $4.0B | -$330M | $389M | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $233M | $906M | $330M | $414M | $306M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $789M | $4.9B | $0 | $803M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.85x | 2.76x | 1.84x | -3.00x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WEX five years ago would be worth $7,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,278 for UIS. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs UIS's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WEX at -6.5% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.7% | -2.8% | +27.6% | +17.3% | -18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.6% | +19.0% | +62.7% | -35.7% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.2% | -18.2% | -40.1% | -21.6% | -31.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.7% | -26.5% | -49.5% | -87.2% | -43.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | +60.9% | -49.5% | -58.7% | +89.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.9% | -6.5% | -15.7% | -7.8% | -11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and EVTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UIS's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs UIS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.07x | 1.32x | 2.40x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.98 | $186.85 | $18.05 | $6.06 | $38.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $120.03 | $9.79 | $1.97 | $22.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +77.2% | +98.2% | +50.3% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.6 | 38.0 | 83.0 | 82.3 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 518K | 1.9M | 672K | 431K |
Analyst Outlook
CNDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNDT as "Hold", WEX as "Hold", FLYW as "Buy", UIS as "Hold", EVTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for UIS (target: $7) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). For income investors, CNDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs EVTC's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $177.67 | $17.50 | $6.50 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 32 | 19 | 9 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | — | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.2% | +16.0% | +3.7% | 0.0% | +4.8% |
WEX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CNDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CNDT vs WEX vs FLYW vs UIS vs EVTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Unisys Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC?
Over the past 5 years, WEX Inc.
(WEX) delivered a total return of -26. 5%, compared to -87. 2% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus CNDT's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Unisys Corporation's 2. 40β — meaning UIS is approximately 216% more volatile than EVTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 95% versus 4% for WEX Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -17. 4% for Unisys Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WEX leads at 25. 4% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Unisys Corporation (UIS) trades at 4.
0x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 45. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UIS: 113. 1% to $6. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC?
In this comparison, CNDT (3.
4% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. WEX, FLYW, UIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNDT or WEX or FLYW or UIS or EVTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield). Unisys Corporation (UIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +89. 5%, UIS: -57. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNDT and WEX and FLYW and UIS and EVTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; UIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CNDT, EVTC pay a dividend while WEX, FLYW, UIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.