Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CNK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
CNK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $3.15B | $372.42B | $179.96B | $73.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.12B | $45.18B | $95.72B | $37.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $138M | $10.98B | $12.25B | $485M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 48.5% | 37.3% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 29.5% | 14.2% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 24.7x | 15.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $3.78B | $14.46B | $44.88B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $344M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $5.31B |
CNK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 184.5 | +84.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 223.0 | +123.0% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.4 | +24.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.22, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.71x
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 15.3x)
- Beta 0.22 vs WBD's 0.90
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs DIS's 4.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -4.8%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +225.5% vs NFLX's -22.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, vs DIS's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +225.5% vs NFLX's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's 0.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs -9.7% |
CNK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
WBD leads 1 • CNK leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $95.7B annually — 30.7x CNK's $3.1B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's 1.3%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $45.2B | $95.7B | $37.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $545M | $30.1B | $19.0B | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $138M | $11.0B | $12.3B | $485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $177M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +48.5% | +37.3% | +44.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +29.5% | +14.2% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +24.3% | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +20.9% | +7.4% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +17.6% | +5.2% | -6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.2% | +31.1% | -4.3% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 58% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WBD's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $372.4B | $180.0B | $73.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $377.8B | $219.1B | $108.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.96x | 34.74x | 14.67x | -5.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.74x | 24.69x | 15.27x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.12x | 12.56x | 11.44x | 9.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 8.24x | 1.91x | 1.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.76x | 14.26x | 1.59x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.80x | 39.36x | 17.86x | 16.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs WBD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.4% | +41.3% | +10.7% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +19.8% | +6.1% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +29.8% | +6.9% | -9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +30.5% | +8.5% | -10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.14x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $5.4B | $39.2B | $34.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $344M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $14.5B | $44.9B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.89x | 17.33x | 7.86x | 1.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,674 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +225.5% total return vs NFLX's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 39.6% vs DIS's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.1% | -3.4% | -10.2% | -4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.2% | -22.5% | +10.4% | +225.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.9% | +172.3% | +2.4% | +111.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.8% | +77.2% | -43.3% | -25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.2% | +883.1% | +4.4% | -1.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +39.6% | +0.8% | +28.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNK and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.01 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.60 | $75.01 | $89.61 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +65.5% | +80.6% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.7 | 39.8 | 48.3 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 44.8M | 8.9M | 22.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CNK and DIS and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNK as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 9.9% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, CNK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs DIS's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.67 | $116.29 | $139.50 | $29.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 99 | 63 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.7% | +2.5% | +1.9% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WBD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CNK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +77. 2%, compared to -43. 3% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +883. 1% versus CNK's -8. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 314% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -4. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -260. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBD leads at 47. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -28. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -25. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 7x for Netflix, Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 38. 8% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
In this comparison, CNK (1.
1% yield), DIS (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNK or NFLX or DIS or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -8. 2%, WBD: -1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNK and NFLX and DIS and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CNK, DIS pay a dividend while NFLX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.