Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNM vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNM
Core & Main, Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$328M
5Y Perf.+87.5%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.79B
5Y Perf.+78.6%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.

Residential Construction

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.84B
5Y Perf.+80.7%
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.54B
5Y Perf.-28.5%
FERG
Ferguson plc

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$48.02B
5Y Perf.+76.0%

CNM vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNM logoCNM
BLDR logoBLDR
IBP logoIBP
SITE logoSITE
FERG logoFERG
IndustryIndustrial - DistributionConstructionResidential ConstructionIndustrial - DistributionIndustrial - Distribution
Market Cap$328M$8.79B$5.84B$5.54B$48.02B
Revenue (TTM)$7.65B$14.82B$2.95B$4.71B$31.63B
Net Income (TTM)$441M$292M$255M$153M$2.07B
Gross Margin26.9%29.9%33.9%34.9%30.7%
Operating Margin9.4%4.2%12.7%5.1%9.2%
Forward P/E21.7x14.1x19.5x28.7x22.1x
Total Debt$2.44B$5.65B$1.05B$980M$5.97B
Cash & Equiv.$220M$182M$322M$191M$674M

CNM vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNM
BLDR
IBP
SITE
FERG
StockJul 21May 26Return
Core & Main, Inc. (CNM)100187.5+87.5%
Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR)100178.6+78.6%
Installed Building … (IBP)100180.7+80.7%
SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE)10071.5-28.5%
Ferguson plc (FERG)100176.0+76.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNM vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IBP leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Core & Main, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. FERG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CNM
Core & Main, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CNM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 2.63x
  • PEG 0.27 vs SITE's 6.91
  • Lower P/E (21.7x vs 22.1x), PEG 0.27 vs 1.30
  • Beta 1.12 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
The Value Angle

BLDR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
The Income Pick

IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 1.5%
  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs FERG's 373.2%
  • Beta 1.19, yield 1.5%, current ratio 3.03x
  • 8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
The Growth Play

SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
Best for: growth exposure
FERG
Ferguson plc
The Growth Leader

FERG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth and momentum.

  • 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
  • +48.6% vs BLDR's -25.0%
Best for: growth and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFERG logoFERG3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
ValueCNM logoCNMLower P/E (21.7x vs 22.1x), PEG 0.27 vs 1.30
Quality / MarginsIBP logoIBP8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyCNM logoCNMBeta 1.12 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
DividendsIBP logoIBP1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FERG's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FERG logoFERG+48.6% vs BLDR's -25.0%
Efficiency (ROA)IBP logoIBP12.2% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4%

CNM vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNMCore & Main, Inc.
FY 2025
Pipes, Valves, And Fitting Products
67.2%$5.1B
Storm Drainage Products
15.6%$1.2B
Meter Products
9.4%$716M
Fire Protection Products
7.8%$600M
BLDRBuilders FirstSource, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Building Products And Services
26.8%$4.1B
Lumber And Lumber Sheet Goods
25.5%$3.9B
Windows Doors And Millwork
25.3%$3.8B
Manufactured Products
22.5%$3.4B
IBPInstalled Building Products, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Installation
50.0%$2.8B
Insulation
30.9%$1.7B
Shower Doors Shelving And Mirrors
4.0%$219M
Other Building Products
3.3%$184M
Garage Doors
3.1%$173M
Waterproofing
2.9%$161M
Rain Gutters
2.3%$125M
Other (2)
3.5%$193M
SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
FY 2025
Landscaping Products
76.9%$3.6B
Agronomic
23.1%$1.1B
FERGFerguson plc
FY 2025
United States Segment
100.0%$29.3B

CNM vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBPLAGGINGFERG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — IBP and SITE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

FERG is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.6B annually — 10.7x IBP's $2.9B. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, SITE holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNM logoCNMCore & Main, Inc.BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…FERG logoFERGFerguson plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7.6B$14.8B$2.9B$4.7B$31.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$912M$1.2B$656M$382M$3.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$441M$292M$255M$153M$2.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$604M$862M$63M$246M$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.9%+29.9%+33.9%+34.9%+30.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.4%+4.2%+12.7%+5.1%+9.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.8%+2.0%+8.6%+3.2%+6.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.9%+5.8%+2.1%+5.2%+3.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.9%-10.1%-3.5%+0.1%-2.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-151.2%-21.3%+1.6%+2.9%
Evenly matched — IBP and SITE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CNM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.7x trailing earnings, CNM trades at a 55% valuation discount to SITE's 37.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CNM offers better value at 0.20x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCNM logoCNMCore & Main, Inc.BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…FERG logoFERGFerguson plc
Market CapShares × price$328M$8.8B$5.8B$5.5B$48.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.5B$14.3B$6.6B$6.3B$53.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.73x20.43x22.33x37.08x26.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.73x14.07x19.50x28.67x22.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.20x2.59x0.92x8.94x1.55x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.81x10.35x13.41x16.70x17.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.04x0.58x1.97x1.18x1.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.16x2.04x8.26x3.35x8.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.54x10.30x19.41x22.44x29.96x
CNM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. SITE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCNM logoCNMCore & Main, Inc.BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…FERG logoFERGFerguson plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.3%+6.9%+37.5%+9.1%+35.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.1%+2.6%+12.2%+4.6%+11.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.6%+6.4%+20.7%+7.3%+18.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.1%+8.5%+22.6%+9.6%+22.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975886
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.18x1.30x1.48x0.58x1.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.2B$5.5B$731M$789M$5.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$220M$182M$322M$191M$674M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.4B$5.6B$1.1B$980M$6.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.74x2.19x9.47x6.79x15.59x
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CNM five years ago would be worth $24,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,157 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, FERG leads with a +48.6% total return vs BLDR's -25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNM logoCNMCore & Main, Inc.BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…FERG logoFERGFerguson plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.0%-24.0%-18.1%-0.1%+10.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.6%-25.0%+34.0%+5.6%+48.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.6%-30.1%+98.3%-18.7%+82.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+148.4%+51.8%+80.6%-38.4%+97.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+148.4%+614.8%+650.1%+368.6%+373.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.7%-11.2%+25.6%-6.7%+22.1%
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CNM and FERG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CNM is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FERG currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNM logoCNMCore & Main, Inc.BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…FERG logoFERGFerguson plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x1.65x1.19x1.24x1.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$67.18$151.03$349.00$168.56$271.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$43.96$73.40$150.83$112.23$166.04
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.0%+52.6%+62.1%+74.1%+90.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.142.855.036.848.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.5M2.4M344K689K1.3M
Evenly matched — CNM and FERG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CNM as "Buy", BLDR as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", SITE as "Buy", FERG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 9.9% for FERG (target: $271). For income investors, IBP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs FERG's 1.00%.

MetricCNM logoCNMCore & Main, Inc.BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…FERG logoFERGFerguson plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$64.00$109.92$293.00$162.29$271.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1443271514
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02520
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.24$2.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.7%+3.0%+1.8%+2.0%
IBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CNM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallInstalled Building Products… (IBP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNM vs BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the stronger pick with 3.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG?

On trailing P/E, Core & Main, Inc.

(CNM) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Core & Main, Inc. wins at 0. 27x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG?

Over the past 5 years, Core & Main, Inc.

(CNM) delivered a total return of +148. 4%, compared to -38. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus CNM's +148. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Core & Main, Inc.

(CNM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 47% more volatile than CNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ferguson plc (FERG) is pulling ahead at 3.

8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Core & Main, Inc. grew EPS 39. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG?

Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 7x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG?

In this comparison, IBP (1.

5% yield), FERG (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CNM, BLDR, SITE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CNM or BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 5% yield, +650. 1% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +650. 1%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CNM and BLDR and IBP and SITE and FERG?

These companies operate in different sectors (CNM (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and SITE (Industrials) and FERG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CNM is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FERG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. IBP, FERG pay a dividend while CNM, BLDR, SITE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CNM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLDR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBP

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SITE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FERG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CNM and BLDR and IBP and SITE and FERG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CNM: -6.9% · BLDR: -10.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CNM: 16.7x · BLDR: 20.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.