Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CNM vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR vs MSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Residential Construction
Construction
Industrial - Distribution
CNM vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR vs MSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Residential Construction | Construction | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $328M | $5.54B | $5.84B | $8.79B | $5.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.65B | $4.71B | $2.95B | $14.82B | $3.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $441M | $153M | $255M | $292M | $205M |
| Gross Margin | 26.9% | 34.9% | 33.9% | 29.9% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 5.1% | 12.7% | 4.2% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 21.7x | 28.7x | 19.5x | 14.1x | 24.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.44B | $980M | $1.05B | $5.65B | $539M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $220M | $191M | $322M | $182M | $56M |
CNM vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR vs MSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) | 100 | 187.5 | +87.5% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 180.7 | +80.7% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 178.6 | +78.6% |
| MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM) | 100 | 117.0 | +17.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNM vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR vs MSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.27 vs SITE's 6.91
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 24.0x)
SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.1%
- 8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
- 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSM's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 12.2% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4%
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 38.6%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.86, yield 3.3%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.86 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 24.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSM's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.8% vs BLDR's -25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4% |
CNM vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR vs MSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNM vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR vs MSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSM leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBP leads 2 • CNM leads 1 • SITE leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 5.0x IBP's $2.9B. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, MSM holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.6B | $4.7B | $2.9B | $14.8B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $912M | $382M | $656M | $1.2B | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $441M | $153M | $255M | $292M | $205M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $604M | $246M | $63M | $862M | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +34.9% | +33.9% | +29.9% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +5.1% | +12.7% | +4.2% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +3.2% | +8.6% | +2.0% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +5.2% | +2.1% | +5.8% | +4.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | +0.1% | -3.5% | -10.1% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +1.6% | -21.3% | -151.2% | +12.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CNM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, CNM trades at a 55% valuation discount to SITE's 37.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CNM offers better value at 0.20x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $328M | $5.5B | $5.8B | $8.8B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $6.3B | $6.6B | $14.3B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.73x | 37.08x | 22.33x | 20.43x | 29.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.73x | 28.67x | 19.50x | 14.07x | 23.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.20x | 8.94x | 0.92x | 2.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.81x | 16.70x | 13.41x | 10.35x | 15.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 1.18x | 1.97x | 0.58x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 3.35x | 8.26x | 2.04x | 4.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.54x | 22.44x | 19.41x | 10.30x | 24.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. MSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs MSM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.3% | +9.1% | +37.5% | +6.9% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +4.6% | +12.2% | +2.6% | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.6% | +7.3% | +20.7% | +6.4% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +9.6% | +22.6% | +8.5% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.58x | 1.48x | 1.30x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | $789M | $731M | $5.5B | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $220M | $191M | $322M | $182M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $980M | $1.1B | $5.6B | $539M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.74x | 6.79x | 9.47x | 2.19x | 12.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNM five years ago would be worth $24,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,157 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, MSM leads with a +43.8% total return vs BLDR's -25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.0% | -0.1% | -18.1% | -24.0% | +23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.6% | +5.6% | +34.0% | -25.0% | +43.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.6% | -18.7% | +98.3% | -30.1% | +26.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.4% | -38.4% | +80.6% | +51.8% | +28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.4% | +368.6% | +650.1% | +614.8% | +87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.7% | -6.7% | +25.6% | -11.2% | +8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.24x | 1.19x | 1.65x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.18 | $168.56 | $349.00 | $151.03 | $107.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.96 | $112.23 | $150.83 | $73.40 | $74.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.0% | +74.1% | +62.1% | +52.6% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 36.8 | 55.0 | 42.8 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 689K | 344K | 2.4M | 604K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBP and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNM as "Buy", SITE as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy", MSM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs -6.3% for MSM (target: $98). For income investors, MSM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs IBP's 1.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.00 | $162.29 | $293.00 | $109.92 | $97.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 15 | 27 | 43 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.5% | — | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.24 | — | $3.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | +3.0% | +4.7% | +0.7% |
MSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). IBP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CNM vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR vs MSM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM?
On trailing P/E, Core & Main, Inc.
(CNM) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Core & Main, Inc. wins at 0. 27x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM?
Over the past 5 years, Core & Main, Inc.
(CNM) delivered a total return of +148. 4%, compared to -38. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus MSM's +87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MSC Industrial Direct Co.
, Inc. (MSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 93% more volatile than MSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Core & Main, Inc. grew EPS 39. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM?
Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSM leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 7x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM?
In this comparison, MSM (3.
3% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CNM, SITE, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNM or SITE or IBP or BLDR or MSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 5% yield, +650. 1% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +650. 1%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNM and SITE and IBP and BLDR and MSM?
These companies operate in different sectors (CNM (Industrials) and SITE (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials) and MSM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CNM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock. IBP, MSM pay a dividend while CNM, SITE, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.