Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CNP vs NI vs EVRG vs SO vs WEC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
CNP vs NI vs EVRG vs SO vs WEC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Gas | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $27.58B | $22.54B | $19.05B | $104.20B | $36.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.41B | $6.82B | $5.99B | $30.17B | $10.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.07B | $962M | $882M | $4.36B | $1.64B |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 62.8% | 41.5% | 43.1% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 27.8% | 25.4% | 24.1% | 24.0% |
| Forward P/E | 22.1x | 22.9x | 19.5x | 20.2x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $23.66B | $16.24B | $15.44B | $65.82B | $22.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $136M | $25M | $1.64B | $28M |
CNP vs NI vs EVRG vs SO vs WEC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy,… (CNP) | 100 | 237.6 | +137.6% |
| NiSource Inc. (NI) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 162.0 | +62.0% |
| WEC Energy Group, I… (WEC) | 100 | 122.9 | +22.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNP vs NI vs EVRG vs SO vs WEC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.8%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 137.6% 10Y total return vs SO's 137.8%
- 21.8% revenue growth vs EVRG's 1.7%
EVRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 0.49x
- PEG 3.19 vs WEC's 4.06
- Beta 0.06, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.49x
Among these 5 stocks, SO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WEC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 16.2% margin vs CNP's 11.4%
- 3.3% ROA vs CNP's 2.3%, ROIC 5.1% vs 4.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.8% revenue growth vs EVRG's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.5x vs 20.2x), PEG 3.19 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.2% margin vs CNP's 11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs NI's 0.22 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WEC's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.7% vs SO's +3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs CNP's 2.3%, ROIC 5.1% vs 4.8% |
CNP vs NI vs EVRG vs SO vs WEC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNP vs NI vs EVRG vs SO vs WEC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NI leads in 2 of 6 categories
WEC leads 1 • EVRG leads 1 • CNP leads 0 • SO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SO is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.2B annually — 5.0x EVRG's $6.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.2% (WEC) to 11.4% (CNP). On growth, WEC holds the edge at +9.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.4B | $6.8B | $6.0B | $30.2B | $10.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.7B | $3.1B | $2.7B | $13.3B | $3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $962M | $882M | $4.4B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.7B | -$1.0B | -$1.1B | -$3.8B | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +62.8% | +41.5% | +43.1% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +27.8% | +25.4% | +24.1% | +24.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +14.1% | +14.7% | +14.5% | +16.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.4% | -15.0% | -18.3% | -12.7% | -11.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +8.2% | +5.5% | +8.0% | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +6.0% | +18.5% | -0.8% | +7.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EVRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, EVRG trades at a 14% valuation discount to CNP's 26.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EVRG offers better value at 3.70x vs WEC's 4.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.6B | $22.5B | $19.1B | $104.2B | $36.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.2B | $38.6B | $34.5B | $168.4B | $59.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.40x | 24.11x | 22.60x | 23.58x | 23.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.12x | 22.85x | 19.52x | 20.21x | 20.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.70x | 4.03x | 4.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.06x | 12.87x | 12.72x | 12.66x | 15.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.95x | 3.39x | 3.22x | 3.53x | 3.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.48x | 1.91x | 1.88x | 2.64x | 2.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEC delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for NI. NI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNP's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NI scores 7/9 vs CNP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +8.4% | +8.6% | +11.3% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +2.7% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +5.3% | +4.5% | +5.3% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +6.0% | +4.9% | +5.4% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.12x | 1.39x | 1.50x | 1.69x | 1.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23.6B | $16.1B | $15.4B | $64.2B | $22.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $136M | $25M | $1.6B | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23.7B | $16.2B | $15.4B | $65.8B | $22.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.38x | 2.87x | 2.46x | 2.51x | 2.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NI five years ago would be worth $20,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,182 for WEC. Over the past 12 months, EVRG leads with a +22.7% total return vs SO's +3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NI at 20.9% vs WEC's 9.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.7% | +13.0% | +14.2% | +6.9% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.4% | +19.0% | +22.7% | +3.6% | +6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +76.8% | +46.0% | +35.5% | +29.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | +100.8% | +49.1% | +60.6% | +31.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.8% | +137.6% | +100.7% | +137.8% | +133.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +20.9% | +13.4% | +10.7% | +9.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EVRG and SO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NI's 0.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVRG currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs SO's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.22x | 0.06x | -0.15x | -0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.47 | $48.98 | $85.27 | $100.84 | $119.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.46 | $37.22 | $63.29 | $83.09 | $100.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +96.0% | +97.0% | +91.7% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 48.8 | 45.8 | 43.5 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 3.9M | 1.8M | 4.5M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EVRG and WEC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNP as "Hold", NI as "Buy", EVRG as "Hold", SO as "Hold", WEC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for WEC (target: $123) vs 3.0% for CNP (target: $44). For income investors, EVRG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CNP's 2.07%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | $49.80 | $89.00 | $99.62 | $122.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 22 | 18 | 33 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +2.9% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $1.12 | $2.62 | $2.72 | $3.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
NI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WEC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CNP vs NI vs EVRG vs SO vs WEC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NiSource Inc.
(NI) is the stronger pick with 21. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NiSource Inc. (NI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC?
On trailing P/E, Evergy, Inc.
(EVRG) is the cheapest at 22. 6x versus CenterPoint Energy, Inc. at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Evergy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Evergy, Inc. wins at 3. 19x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC?
Over the past 5 years, NiSource Inc.
(NI) delivered a total return of +100. 8%, compared to +31. 8% for WEC Energy Group, Inc. (WEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SO returned +137. 8% versus EVRG's +100. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus NiSource Inc. 's 0. 22β — meaning NI is approximately -243% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NiSource Inc. (NI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 139% versus 2% for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NiSource Inc.
(NI) is pulling ahead at 21. 8% versus 1. 7% for Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NiSource Inc. grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 4% for Evergy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NI leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC?
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
(WEC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 9% net margin versus 11. 2% for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NI leads at 27. 6% versus 22. 6% for CNP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NI leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 19x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) trades at 19. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for NiSource Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WEC: 8. 9% to $122. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 1% for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP).
09Is CNP or NI or EVRG or SO or WEC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 9% yield, +137. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +137. 8%, NI: +137. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNP and NI and EVRG and SO and WEC?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EVRG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WEC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.