Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs PHUN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNVS
Cineverse Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$51M
5Y Perf.-84.5%
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.-67.9%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.-92.2%
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.-69.7%
PHUN
Phunware, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$41M
5Y Perf.-96.9%

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs PHUN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNVS logoCNVS
CURI logoCURI
FUBO logoFUBO
AMCX logoAMCX
PHUN logoPHUN
IndustryEntertainmentBroadcastingBroadcastingEntertainmentSoftware - Application
Market Cap$51M$184M$317M$98M$41M
Revenue (TTM)$55M$72M$2.72B$2.32B$2M
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$-6M$156M$-140M$-12M
Gross Margin53.9%56.6%11.1%51.0%41.3%
Operating Margin-12.5%-10.2%-2.6%-3.0%-7.4%
Forward P/E16.4x89.7x5.0x
Total Debt$462K$12M$670M$0.00$932K
Cash & Equiv.$14M$18M$452M$113M

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs PHUNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNVS
CURI
FUBO
AMCX
PHUN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS)10015.5-84.5%
CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI)10032.1-67.9%
fuboTV Inc. (FUBO)1007.8-92.2%
AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX)10030.3-69.7%
Phunware, Inc. (PHUN)1003.1-96.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs PHUN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FUBO and AMCX are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. AMC Networks Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CURI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CNVS
Cineverse Corp.
The Growth Angle

CNVS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.
The Income Pick

CURI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.44, yield 12.2%
  • -63.2% 10Y total return vs AMCX's -87.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.23x
  • Beta 1.44, yield 12.2%, current ratio 1.23x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
The Growth Play

FUBO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
  • 67.7% revenue growth vs PHUN's -34.0%
  • 5.7% margin vs PHUN's -5.1%
  • 8.1% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC -3.3% vs 20.3%
Best for: growth exposure
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.
The Value Play

AMCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.86 vs PHUN's 2.37
  • +29.1% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Best for: value and stability
PHUN
Phunware, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PHUN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUBO logoFUBO67.7% revenue growth vs PHUN's -34.0%
ValueAMCX logoAMCXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFUBO logoFUBO5.7% margin vs PHUN's -5.1%
Stability / SafetyAMCX logoAMCXBeta 0.86 vs PHUN's 2.37
DividendsCURI logoCURI12.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMCX logoAMCX+29.1% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Efficiency (ROA)FUBO logoFUBO8.1% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC -3.3% vs 20.3%

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs PHUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNVSCineverse Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CURICuriosityStream Inc.
FY 2025
Trade And Barter Transactions
100.0%$18,000
FUBOfuboTV Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Circulation
92.4%$1.5B
Advertising
7.1%$115M
Service, Other
0.5%$7M
AMCXAMC Networks Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
62.9%$1.5B
Advertising
25.1%$581M
License
12.0%$278M
PHUNPhunware, Inc.
FY 2024
Software subscriptions and services
59.8%$2M
Advertising
40.2%$1M

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs PHUN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCURILAGGINGPHUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FUBO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FUBO is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 1154.9x PHUN's $2M. FUBO is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PHUN's -5.1%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.PHUN logoPHUNPhunware, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$55M$72M$2.7B$2.3B$2M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$14M-$14M$686M-$17M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M-$6M$156M-$140M-$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M$13M-$81M$267M-$12M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.9%+56.6%+11.1%+51.0%+41.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.5%-10.2%-2.6%-3.0%-7.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-16.7%-9.0%+5.7%-6.0%-5.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-22.8%+18.1%-3.0%+11.5%-5.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.0%+35.8%+2.5%-6.3%-6.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-113.2%-31.2%+81.8%-10.4%+52.0%
FUBO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURI's 24.2x.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.PHUN logoPHUNPhunware, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$51M$184M$317M$98M$41M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$38M$179M$534M$98M-$71M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.44x-28.55x-44.88x-2.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.89.71x5.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.24x24.22x0.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.66x2.57x0.12x0.04x12.79x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.24x4.36x0.12x0.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.17x14.24x0.32x
AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CNVS and FUBO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FUBO delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CNVS. PHUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CURI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNVS scores 7/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.PHUN logoPHUNPhunware, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-24.4%-13.1%+16.2%-12.2%-11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.4%-8.2%+8.1%-3.3%-10.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.3%-12.2%-3.3%+12.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+22.3%-13.6%-4.1%-28.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975434
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.30x0.25x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$13M-$6M$218M$0-$112M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$14M$18M$452M$113M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$462,000$12M$670M$0$932,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.16x10.35x0.95x-196.80x
Evenly matched — CNVS and FUBO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CURI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CURI five years ago would be worth $2,978 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $299 for PHUN. Over the past 12 months, AMCX leads with a +29.1% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURI at 54.7% vs PHUN's -59.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.PHUN logoPHUNPhunware, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+25.2%-14.4%-65.3%-7.5%+9.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.1%-23.1%-65.6%+29.1%-29.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.2%+270.5%-51.7%-44.0%-93.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.3%-70.2%-94.8%-81.9%-97.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.4%-63.2%-90.3%-87.4%-99.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-26.4%+54.7%-21.6%-17.6%-59.5%
CURI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMCX is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PHUN's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMCX currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.PHUN logoPHUNPhunware, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.44x1.44x1.77x0.86x2.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.39$7.15$56.64$10.18$3.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.77$2.81$2.48$5.41$1.56
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+35.6%+43.9%+19.0%+84.1%+52.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.743.038.057.345.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded145K349K1.9M386K140K
AMCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CURI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CURI as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold", AMCX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs -6.5% for AMCX (target: $8). CURI is the only dividend payer here at 12.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.PHUN logoPHUNPhunware, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.67$43.00$8.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts91440
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+12.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CURI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AMCX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CURI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallCuriosityStream Inc. (CURI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs PHUN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN?

On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc.

is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN?

Over the past 5 years, CuriosityStream Inc.

(CURI) delivered a total return of -70. 2%, compared to -97. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CURI returned -63. 2% versus PHUN's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Phunware, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning PHUN is approximately 177% more volatile than AMCX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for CuriosityStream Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -34. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cineverse Corp. grew EPS 109. 0% year-over-year, compared to 54. 2% for CuriosityStream Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN?

AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -323. 5% for Phunware, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNVS leads at 10. 1% versus -435. 5% for PHUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CURI leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 89. 7x for CuriosityStream Inc. — 84. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN?

In this comparison, CURI (12.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CNVS, FUBO, AMCX, PHUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or PHUN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86)). Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMCX: -87. 4%, PHUN: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CNVS and CURI and FUBO and AMCX and PHUN?

These companies operate in different sectors (CNVS (Communication Services) and CURI (Communication Services) and FUBO (Communication Services) and AMCX (Communication Services) and PHUN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CNVS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CURI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PHUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CURI pays a dividend while CNVS, FUBO, AMCX, PHUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CNVS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CURI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUBO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMCX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PHUN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CNVS and CURI and FUBO and AMCX and PHUN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CNVS: -60.0% · CURI: 35.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.